Cases

05/27/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 9, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOHN CALVIN MURRAY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Robertson County No. 2012-CR-206 Jill Bartee Ayers, Judge ___________________________________

03/26/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 10, 2017 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CALVIN LYNDELL DIBRELL Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 105374 Steven W. Sword, Judge No. E2016-02279-CCA-R3-CD The defendant

06/30/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 8, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE V. CALVIN SMITH and HAYDEN BOWEN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 18-07315 Carolyn W. Blackett, Judge _____________________________

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs at Jackson March 3, 2015 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ALFRED CALVIN WHITEHEAD Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2011-C-2526 Monte D. Watkins, Judge No. M2014-00748-CCA-R3-CD - Filed July 9, 2015 The Defendant, Alfred Calvin Whitehead, was convicted by a Davidson County Criminal Court

239 S.W.3d 575 (2007) Calvin E. JONES, Appellant v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee. No. 2006-CA-000960-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. November 2, 2007. *576 Lisa Bridges Clare, Assistant Public Advocate, Department of Public Advocacy, Frankfort, KY, for appellant. Gregory D. Stumbo, Attorney General of Kentucky, Bry

678 N.W.2d 627 (2004) 260 Mich. App. 424 PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Calvin Earl JONES, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 242871. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted December 9, 2003, at Lansing. Decided January 27, 2004, at 9:00 a.m. Released for Publication April 14, 2004.

515 F.Supp.2d 206 (2007) DEPUY SPINE, INC., f/k/a Depuy Acromed, Inc. and Biedermann Motech GMBH, Plaintiffs v. MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC., f/k/a Sofamor Danek Group, Inc., and Medtronic Sofamor Danek Usa, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-10165-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 3, 2007. *207 All

HEANEY, Circuit Judge. Wyeth brought an action against Natural Biologies, Inc. and Natural Biologies, LLC (“Natural Biologies”) for misappropriation of a trade secret, in violation of the Minnesota Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Minnesota Statute sections 325C.01 — .08 (“MUTSA”). Wyeth alleged that Natural Biologies illegally acquired Wyeth’s trade secret process for producing bulk natural conjugated estrogens used in the develo

534 F.Supp.2d 224 (2008) DEPUY SPINE, INC., f/k/a Depuy Acromed, Inc. and Biedermann Motech GmbH, Plaintiffs v. MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC., f/k/a Sofamor Danek Group, Inc., and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-10165-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 25, 2008. *225 A

533 F.Supp.2d 243 (2008) DEPUY SPINE, INC., f/k/a Depuy Acromed, Inc. and Biedermann Motech GMBH, Plaintiffs v. MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC., f/k/a Sofamor Danek Group, Inc., and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-CV-10165 EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 6, 2008. *244

526 F.Supp.2d 162 (2007) DEPUY SPINE, INC., f/k/a Depuy Acromed, Inc. and Biedermann Motech GMBH, Plaintiffs v. MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK, INC., f/k/a Sofamor Danek Group, Inc., and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-10165-EFH. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 11, 2007. *163 A

02/18/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 2, 2021 Session TOM SLAGLE ET AL. V. THE CHURCH OF THE FIRTSBORN OF TENNESSEE ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Robertson County No. CH18-CV-487 Laurence M. McMillan, Jr., Chancellor

JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *995THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Jesse Berkey, Aaron Eaton, Joseph Gutierrez, Aurelio Marquez, Rudy Martinez, Paul Matamoros, Clifford Rogers, Harry Williams and Calvin Finch's Motion for Remand to State Court, filed August 15, 2016 (Doc. 329)("Motion").

PICKETT, Judge. J¡FACTS On March 22, 2011, the defendant was stopped by a police officer who had just received a radio dispatch concerning a possible burglary. The officer was suspicious of the defendant because the defendant was walking in the middle of the roadway, was wearing a hoodie, and was walking froin the direction of the possible burglary. When the officer attempted to pat down the defe

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2008, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED for'the reasons ably set-forth in the opinion of the Honorable James Gardner Colins, which opinion is adopted as that of the Supreme Court. See Marcavage v. Rendell, 936 A.2d 188 (Pa.Cmwlth.2007).

951 A.2d 345 (2008) Michael MARCAVAGE, Mark Diener, Linda Beckman, Randall Beckman, Susan Startzell, Arlene Elshinnawy and Nancy Major v. Edward G. RENDELL, Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, John M. Perzel, Speaker Of The Pennsylvania House Of Representatives, Robert C. Jubelirer, President Pro Tempore of the Pennsylvania Senate, Honorable Pedro A. Cortes, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, All in Their Official Capacities

ORDER PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 23rd day of July, 2008, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED for the reasons ably set forth in the opinion of the Honorable James Gardner Colins, which opinion is adopted as that of the Supreme Court. See Marcavage v. Rendell, 936 A.2d 188 (Pa.Cmwlth.2007).

*315 BARBERA, C.J. On August 6, 2013, Petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, acting through Bar Counsel, filed with this Court a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action (the “Petition”) against Respondent, attorney Jason Robin Gelb. T

*359MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVIS, District Judge. Before the Court is U.S. Synthetic Corp. and Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.’s (collectively “US Synthetic”) Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Deposition Testimony and Production of Documents (Docket No. 75). After considering the parties’ briefs and oral arguments, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES

514 F.Supp.2d 916 (2007) TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LTD. and Patriot Scientific Corp., Plaintiffs, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:05-CV-494 (TJW). United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. June 15, 2007. *917 *918