Cases

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JASON DENNIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D19-1227 [October 10, 2019] Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vtcourts.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2024 VT 32

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JASON A. VERA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D2023-1311 [September 25, 2024] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Andre

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JASON DINGMAN, individually, and JASON DINGMAN and AMY DINGMAN, as parents and natural guardians of KAYLA DINGMAN, a minor, Appellants, v. ALLO REALTY, INC., DIANA GOLDMAN, WILLIAM LOBRUTTO, TONYA M. VONKOMARNICKI and GUSCENIE BOSTON, JR., Appellees.

NOTICE The text of this opinion can be corrected before the opinion is published in the Pacific Reporter. Readers are encouraged to bring typographical or other formal errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts: 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Fax: (907) 264-0878 E-mail: corrections @ akcourts.us IN T

Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge Before the Court is an action under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, challenging the withholding of a single email message by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO"). The email at-issue was sent by one PTO patent examiner to another

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Chief Magistrate Judge I. Introduction This case arises under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq. Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper, an environmental advocacy group, alleges that Defendants Levin Enterprises, Inc. (“LEI”),' and Levin-

OPINION AND ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J. Defendant Trabajamos Community Head Start, Jnc. (“Trabajamos”) received federal funds under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”), the economic stimulus package enacted early in President Barack Obama’s first term of office, Naomi Herrera-Castro (“Castro”), the former Executive Director of Trabajamos, claimed that she was fired for reporting,

JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judge, with whom WILSON, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: I join in full Judge Martin’s thorough and thoughtful dissent. I write separately to add an observation about the incentives we create for police officers, and the guidance we provide for district courts, when we cloak fast-acting officers with qualified immunity based on

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE In the Matter of THE JEREMY ) PARADISE DYNASTY TRUST and ) C.A. No. 2021-0354-KSJM THE ANDREW PARADISE DYNASTY ) TRUST ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: November 16, 2021 Date Decided: November 29, 2021 Luke W. Mette, Jonathan M. Stemerman, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; John

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE In the Matter of THE JEREMY ) PARADISE DYNASTY TRUST and THE ) C.A. No. 2021-0354-KSJM ANDREW PARADISE DYNASTY ) TRUST ) POST-TRIAL MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: October 10, 2022 Date Decided: January 31, 2023 Jonathan M. Stemerman, ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Richa

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. This is a petition for review, in a Federal Railroad Safety Act (“FRSA”) whistle-blower retaliation action, of an agency decision resulting in the statutory maximum award of punitive damages against a railroad. The railroad brought charges of dishonesty and insubordination, as well as threats of dismissal, against an injured employee who had filed a complaint u

PER CURIAM Facts and Procedural History ¶ 1 Debbie Tigges is the spouse and legal guardian of Richard Steven Tigges. She is also the mother of S.T., a minor child. 1 In June 2014, Ms. Tigges filed a lawsuit against several defendants. The petition raised claims for personal injuries

OPINION OF THE COURT Louis B. York, J. The Facts, Briefly This is a wrongful death action. The deceased, Adrienne Levine, was murdered. Diego Pilleo was convicted of her murder and is serving a sentence of 25 years. Nature of the Action Her husband, Andrew Ostroy, is suing, as executor of the deceased’s estate, as well as in his personal capacity, and

CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendants, TD Ameritrade, Inc. ("TDA") and TD Ameritrade Futures & Forex LLC's ("TDAFF['s]") Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Class Action Complaint1 [ECF No. 59] for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), filed July 23, 2018. Plaintiffs, Diego Krukever, Karem Sand

OPINION JOSEPH H. RODRIGUEZ, U.S.D.J. This securities fraud matter is before the Court on four motions to dismiss filed by Defendants. The Court heard oral argument on the motions on May 23, 2017 and the record of that proceeding is incorporated here. For the reasons placed on the record that day and those provided below, the motions of Defendants Amaya, Inc. [47] and David Baazov [50] will be denied. The

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this FILED Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as May 16 2017, 9:38 am precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK Indiana Supreme Court estoppel, or the law of the case. C

MEMORANDUM JOYNER, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendants Devon Robotics, LLC, Devon Health Services, and John A. Bennett, M.D.’s (“Devon”) Motion to Quash the Subpoenas Issued by ITOCHU International, Inc. (Doc. No. 268), and ITO-CHU’S Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 271). For the reasons below, the Motion to Quash is DENIED. An Order follows. I. BACKGROUND

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROYCE C. LAMBERTE, United States District Judge Before the Court are supplemental briefs'concerning what information will be sealed in the course of this litigation. Mr. Hyatt argues that a great deal of the information pertaining to his patent applications and prosecutions should remain sealed. The PTO takes a more narrow view of wh

WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: We certified the following question of state law to the Delaware Supreme Court: Does the diminution in the value of a limited liability company, which serves as a feeder fund in a limited partnership, provide the basis for an investor’s direct suit against the general partners when the company and the partnership alloca