Cases

KEARSE, Circuit Judge: Defendants Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, and Armando Velasquez appeal from judgments entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York following a jury trial before Thomas C. Platt, Chief Judge, convicting them of various narcotics, racketeering, and weapons offenses. Each

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM. We grant the State’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute the following in its place. The trial court denied appellant’s Rule 3.800(a) motion for additional jail credit by attaching a copy of the negotiated plea form which contains a scrawled, handwritten notation that defendant was to receive forty days jail credit. We initiall

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA KATHERINE ROSENBERG-WOHL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. S281510 First Appellate District, Division Two A163848 San Francisco City and County Superior Court CGC-20-587264 July 18, 202

664 F.Supp.2d 247 (2009) William ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. Dale ARTUS, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent. No. 07-CV-6041-CJS-VEB. United States District Court, W.D. New York. October 16, 2009. *252 William Robinson, Attica, NY, pro se. Alyson J. Gill, Malancha Chanda, Priscilla I. Steward, Office o

573 F.3d 526 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan ALVIAR, Rodolfo Madrigal, Jose Melero, Apolinar Delgado-Rios, and Saul Tejeda, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 07-2333, 07-2336, 07-2338, 07-2366, 07-2385. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 15, 2009. Decided July 23, 2009.

529 F.3d 1290 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kelvin B. SCOTT, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-6111. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. June 24, 2008. *1293 David Autry, Oklahoma City, OK, for Defendant-Appellant. Sanford C. Coats, Assistant United States Attorney (John C. Richter, Unit

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 07-2333, 07-2336, 07-2338, 07-2366 & 07-2385 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUAN A LVIAR, R ODOLFO M ADRIGAL, JOSE M ELERO , A POLINAR D ELGADO-R IOS, and S AUL T EJEDA, Defendants-Appellants. Appeals from the United

335 F.Supp.2d 450 (2004) Vernon LONG, Petitioner, v. DONNELLY, Warden of Wende C.F., Respondent. No. 03 Civ. 4837(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 13, 2004. *451 *452 *453 Vernon Long, Romulus, NY, Pro se. Nicole Beder, Dis

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

Opinion STANIFORTH, J. A jury found Herman G. Martin guilty of conspiracy to commit extortion (Pen. Code, §§ 182, subd. 1, 518), conspiracy to commit assault with a deadly weapon (§§ 245, subd. (a), 182, subd. 1), murder (§ 187), and simple assault (§ 240). The jury also found Martin was armed with a firearm during the commission of the conspiracies and murder (§

91 Md. App. 35 (1992) 603 A.2d 1258 MARK EDWARD SPARKS v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 788, September Term, 1991. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. April 6, 1992. Jennifer P. Lyman, Assigned Public Defender, Washington, D.C. (Stephen E. Harris, Public Defender, Baltimore, on the brief), for appellant. Kathryn Grill Graeff, Asst. Atty. Ge

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

Motion to vacate the Court of Appeals March 27, 1986 order dismissing appeal of disbarment order denied, with $20 costs. [See, 67 NY2d 870.] Motion for consolidation of appeal from disbarment order with the appeal, by permission from the suspension order, dismissed as academic. Motion for rescheduling of oral argument in the suspension order appeal denied. Motion for remand of the proceedings to the lower court denied. Motion for a stay of sanct

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV