Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jared Michael Wood”
Jared David McEwen v. Statepublic domain
FILE COPY CHIEF JUSTICE CLERK JAMES T. WORTHEN CATHY S. LUSK TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS JUSTICES
Wood v. ITDpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 49298 ) TODD A. WOOD, ) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) Boise, November 2022 Term ) v. )
Jared Effler v. Purdue Pharma L.P.public domain
12/17/2020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 2, 2020 Session1 JARED EFFLER ET AL. v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for Campbell County No. 16596 J
February 5, 2021 Supreme Court No. 2018-233-M.P. Jared Starnino : v. : Employees’ Retirement System of : the City of Providence. NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. R
February 5, 2021 Supreme Court No. 2018-233-M.P. Jared Starnino : v. : Employees’ Retirement System of : the City of Providence. NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. R
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Woodpublic domain
870 F.Supp. 797 (1994) The RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Plaintiff, v. Joseph B. WOOD, et al., Defendants. No. 92-2204HBre. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. November 30, 1994. *798 *799 *800 Robert E. Craddock, Jr., McDonnell Dyer,
United States v. Terrypublic domain
Barrett, Circuit Judge. Is it reasonable for officers to assume that a woman who answers the door in a bathrobe has authority to consent to a search of a male suspect's residence? We hold that the answer is no. The officers could reasonably assume that the woman had spent the night at the apartment, but that's about as far as a bathrobe could take them. Without more, it was unreasonable for them to conclude that she and the suspect
Wood v. Thalerpublic domain
787 F.Supp.2d 458 (2011) Jeffery Lee WOOD, TDCJ No. 999256, Petitioner, v. Rick THALER, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent. Civil No. SA-01-CA-423-OG. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. May 10, 2011. *460 J. Scott Sullivan, Law Offices of J.
State v. Michael Cliff Eubankspublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Michael Cliff Eubanks, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2018-001684 Appeal from Laurens County Frank R. Addy, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5933 Heard April 13, 2021 – Filed August 10, 2022
FILED Feb 24 2020, 5:36 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
Atfeh v. Gichimupublic domain
PER CURIAM. Appellants challenge the order awarding attorney’s fees based on a proposal for settlement. Because the proposal failed to comply with the rule in effect at the time it was served, we reverse. On August 12, 2010, Appellee served a $150,000 proposal for settlement on Appellants. The proposal did not state the amount and terms attributable to each Appellant. At the time of the proposal, Florida
Stephen Michael West v. Derrick D. Schofieldpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 18, 2014 Session STEPHEN MICHAEL WEST, et al. v. DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, et al. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals, Middle Section Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 13-1627-I Claudia C. Bonnyman, Chancellor _________________________________ No. M2014
MRL Development I, LLC v. Whitecap Investment Corp.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT (May 17, 2016) Fisher, Judge. Michael Lucht (and his company, MRL Development I, LLC), purchased treated lumber for a deck on his vacation home in the Virgin Islands. The lumber allegedly decayed prematurely. After replacing rotten deck boards, Lucht brought suit against the retailer, wholesaler,
People for Ethical Treatment of Property Owners v. United States Fish & Wildlife Servicepublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DEE BENSON, District Judge. Plaintiff People for the Ethical Treatment of Property Owners (“PETPO”) filed the instant lawsuit against United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Daniel M. Ashe, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Noreen Walsh, in her official capacity as Regional Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife S
Michael Blaine Ward, II v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 17, 2011 Session MICHAEL BLAINE WARD, II v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Coffee County No. 34417 Vanessa A. Jackson, Judge No. M2011-00122-CCA-R3-PC - April 20, 2012 The Petitioner, Michael Blaine Ward, II, appeals the Coffee County Circuit Court’s denial of
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL WAYNE STROUTHpublic domain
FILED 04/06/2026 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE Clerk of the AT KNOXVILLE Appellate Courls Assigned on Briefs November 18, 2025
Alter v. Federal Deposit Insurancepublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS TED STEWART, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (“FDIC”)1 motions to dismiss or transfer. Defendant FDIC has filed two motions in its corporate capacity (“FDIC-*1328C”) and one motion in its capacity as
OPINION AND ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANTS RAM GUNABA-LAN, M.D., MICHIGAN VISITING PHYSICIANS, PC, MUNDY PAIN CLINIC, AND BIO-MAGNETI C RESONANCE, INC.’S (CORRECTED) MOTION TO DISMISS RICO CLAIMS BASED ON REVERSE PREEMPTION OF THE MCCAR- ' RAN-FERGUSON ACT (ECF NO. hi) AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANT BIO-MAGNETIC RESONANCE, INC. ’S (CORRECTED) MOTION TO DISMISS OR DECLINE JURISDICTION OVER DECLARATORY JUDGMENT CLAIM (ECF NO. h%)
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ECF NOS. 20, 21, 23, 25, 32, and 46) and DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE (ECF NO. 22) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 20, 21, 23, 25, 32, 46) and Defendants’ Motion to Strike (ECF No. 22). Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Company (“State Farm”) filed resp
MASAD v. Weberpublic domain
772 N.W.2d 144 (2009) 2009 SD 80 Randall F. MASAD and Lori J. Masad, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Doug WEBER, Bob Kuemper, Dennis Block, Daryl Slykhuis, Owen Spurrel, Robert Rae, Tom Linneweber, Barb Boldt, Kristin Jensen, Jeremy Roland, Randy Flick, Jeff Baker, Darin Young, Laurel Paulson, David Lentsch, Jodi Wiese, Brad Woodward, Larry Weins, Jorgene Williams, Sandy *145 Wechsler, Tr