Cases

694 S.W.2d 585 (1985) Elijio Flores JARAMILLO, Appellant, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO., Appellee. No. 13-84-460-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. May 2, 1985. Rehearing Denied May 23, 1985. *586 John D. Wennermark, San Antonio, for appellant. F. Van Huseman, White, Huseman, Pletcher &a;

Office of the Director 15:27:04 2023.09.27 New Mexico Compilation '00'06- Commission 2020.005.30524

236 P.3d 421 (2010) DESERT MOUNTAIN PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 08-0802. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D. August 3, 2010. *424 David Bell & Associates, PLLC By David M. Bell,

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. No. 59 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Jose Antonio Aguilar Jaramillo alleges that three San Mateo police officers assaulted him while he was on his way to a taquería. He contends the officers struck him in the head, threw him down onto the sidewalk, and broke one

Opinion RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J. The County of Orange (the County) appeals from a judgment awarding former Orange County Assistant Sheriff George Jaramillo (Jaramillo) backpay for the period from his March 2004 summary dismissal from the sheriff’s department until his January 2007 plea of no contest to two state law felony counts. The 2007 no contest plea made it impossible for him to continue to work as a law

282 F.3d 1005 Cynthia E. CANADY, Marva Jean Saunders, both parties individually and representing a class of similarly situated persons; Mischelle A. Greer; Jimmy D. Hunt; Tamara A. Hunt; Kim Y. Nickerson; Esther E. Moten; Kerry L. Butler; Nadine Farris; Charles Lockridge, Plaintiffs-Appellants.Coleman McClain; Evalin McClain; John Hammonds; Alma Hammonds; Sara Kenner; Clarence Kenner, Intervenor Plaintiffs-Appellants.v.ALLSTATE INSURANC

NUMBER 13-26-00118-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE ALEJANDRA SUAREZ JARAMILLO ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices Peña and West Memorandum Opinion by Justice Peña1

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be May 17 2017, 6:06 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeals

Appellate Case: 21-1069 Document: 010110719735 Date Filed: 08/03/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 3, 2022

OPINION Sweet, D.J. Plaintiffs The Netherlands Insurance Company (“Netherlands”) and Arthur Lange, Inc. (“Lange”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) have moved pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for partial summary judgment declaring that the defendant United Specialty Insurance Company (“United” or the “Defendant”) owes Lange a duty to defend and indemnify in the action Donizete J

OPINION APODACA, Judge. Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company (Defendant) appeals and Charter Services, Inc., (Plaintiff) cross-appeals a judgment after a bench trial. The judgment awarded Plaintiff damages for negligent misrepresentation involving the purchase of a group health insurance policy from Defendant. In its appeal, Defendant raises the following issues: (1)

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 31, 35) CHRISTINA REISS, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Lisa Rotman brings this insurance coverage action seeking compensation under the uninsured motorist insurance policy she holds with Defendants Progressive Insurance Company (“Progressive”), as well as the excess cover

ORDER AND REASONS SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge. Before the Court is defendant Allstate Insurance Company’s motion to strike the class allegations pursuant to Rule 23(d)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the *210following reasons, the Court GRANTS defendant’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Plai

OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Sun Life and Health Insurance Company (U.S.) (“Sun Life”) brought this Inter-pleader Complaint against Kathleen Colav-ito, Domenic Colavito, and Teresa Mamone Colavito, to determine the proper distribution of benefits from a life-insurance policy held by Matthew Colavito. (See Am. Compl. (Dkt. No. 3).) In their Answer, Claimants Dom

OPINION WOLFSON, District Judge: This case involves complex retrocessional agreements between Plaintiff Munich Reinsurance America Inc. (“Munich”) and Defendant American National Insurance Company (“ANICO”). Munich filed a Complaint alleging breach of contract for ANICO’s refusal to pay certain claims submitted for payment by Munich under the parties’ agreements, and in response, ANI-CO filed a countercla

713 F.Supp.2d 206 (2010) NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF LOUISIANA, A1 Marine Adjusters, Inc., Navigators Insurance Services of Texas, Inc. and Marine Office of America Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. UNIVERSAL FABRICATORS, INC., General Star National Insurance Company, New York Marine and General Insurance Company, Mutual Marine Office, Inc. and American Alternative Insurance Group, Defendants. No. 05 Civ. 3418(SAS).</

469 F.Supp. 1099 (1979) OFFSHORE LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. and Offshore Logistics, Inc. v. ARKWRIGHT-BOSTON MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Civ. A. No. 77-2079. United States District Court, E. D. Louisiana, New Orleans Division. March 8, 1979. *1100 *1101 Clayton G. Ramsey, Phelps, Dun

Justice WAINWRIGHT delivered the opinion of the Court, joined by Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice HECHT, Justice O’NEILL, Justice BRISTER, Justice MEDINA, Justice GREEN, and Justice WILLETT, and by Justice JOHNSON as to sections I, II, and IV only. This case is before the Court on a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit: “Does Texas public

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM P. JOHNSON, District Judge. On July 31, 2006, Plaintiff Louetta Bon-ham (“Plaintiff’) filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 26) as to *1200Plaintiffs entitlement to stacking under the terms of the insurance policy issued by Defendant Indemnity Insurance Company of North America (“D

168 F.3d 340 UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff,v.CONCRETE HOLDING COMPANY, formerly known as St. CharlesQuarry Company, doing business as Defiance Quarry, doingbusiness as Kurtz Concrete, Inc., doing business as GoellnerRedi-Mix, Inc., a corporation; St. Charles County SanitaryLandfill, Inc., an administratively-dissolved corporation;Quarry Holding Company, a voluntarily-dissolved cor