Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Janke v. New York Life Ins Co”
Olson v. A. W. Chesterton Co.public domain
256 N.W.2d 530 (1977) Gary OLSON and Bonnie Kay Olson, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant and Appellant. Civ. No. 9288. Supreme Court of North Dakota. July 27, 1977. Rehearing Denied August 18, 1977. *533 Degnan, McElroy, Lamb, Camrud, Maddock & Olson, Gran
65 F.Supp. 293 (1946) MINOT BEVERAGE CO. v. MINNEAPOLIS & ST. LOUIS RY. CO. Civ. No. 1602. District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. April 15, 1946. *294 Sidney G. Blacker (of Blacker & Blacker), of Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff. C. W. Wright, John C. De Mar, and Richard Musenbrock, all of Minneapolis, Min
Ed. Schuster & Co. v. Steffespublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 43 These were separate actions commenced on May 6, 1939, by Ed. Schuster Company, Inc., a corporation, and Herzfeld-Phillipson Company, a Wisconsin corporation, respectively, to enjoin the district attorney of Milwaukee county from enforcing the provisions of ch. 52, Laws of 1939, which created sec.
Tompkins v. Detroit Metropolitan Airportpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Northwest Airlines’ Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Execute Authorizations [Doc. # 144]. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is DENIED. This is a slip-and-fall case in which the Plaintiff claims back and other injuries related to a December 29, 2005 accident at Detroit Metropolitan A
OPINION OF THE COURT Andres J. Valdespino, J. Petitioner landlord commenced this proceeding seeking to obtain a judgment of eviction against respondent tenant on the basis of a breach by tenant of a provision of the lease requiring the tenant to comply with all laws and regulations. A hearing on this matter was held on December 11, 2014. Subsequently counsel for the parties submitted post-hearing memoranda a
Gee v. Pachecopublic domain
627 F.3d 1178 (2010) Donald GEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mike PACHECO, in his official capacity as Unit Manager, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary; Vance Everett, in his official capacity as (former) Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary; Carl Voigtsberger, in his official capacity as Classification and Housing Manager, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary; Scott Abbott, in his official ca
Dan Nelson, Automotive, Inc. v. Vikenpublic domain
ZINTER, Justice. [¶ 1.] Dan Nelson Automotive Inc. (Nelson) and the South Dakota Acceptance *241Corporation (CNAC) brought an action for declaratory relief against the Secretary of the Department of Revenue and Regulation in his individual and official capacities. Nelson requested the circuit court to interpret certain statutes that impose an excise tax on the sale of
In re Doepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT John M. Leventhal, J. This is a motion by the court evaluator,1 made in the context *895of a guardianship proceeding under article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law, to compel the spouse of an incapacitated person (IP) to transfer back funds to the incapacitated person. In deciding this motion, the court
Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.public domain
James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed March 23, 2018 (Doc. 27)("MTD"). The Court held a hearing on August 10, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the applicable statutes of limitations bar Plaintiff Janice Nowell's claims against Defendants Medtronic Inc., Covidien PLC, Covidien LP, and Medtronic PLC for negligence, strict
Williams v. Lynchpublic domain
Yesawich Jr., J. Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Ellison, J.), entered June 28, 1996 in Chemung County, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) from the judgment entered thereon. At issue is an alleged oral contract, by the terms of which the parties were to cohabit and share household expenses. According to plaintiff, she agreed to sell her own hous
Gee v. Pachecopublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit December 2, 2010 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court
Cargill, Inc. v. Sears Petroleum & Transport Corp.public domain
334 F.Supp.2d 197 (2004) CARGILL, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. SEARS PETROLEUM & TRANSPORT CORP., and Sears Ecological Applications Co., LLC, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 503CV0530DEP. United States District Court, N.D. New York. August 27, 2004. *198 *199 *200
Peterson v. Berg (In Re Berg)public domain
387 B.R. 524 (2008) In the matter of Stanley BERG, Debtor. Ronald R. Peterson, Plaintiff, v. Stanley Berg, et al., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05 B 58649. Adversary No. 06 A 01026. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 10, 2008. *535 Ronald R. Peterson, Esq., Elizabeth A. Kalisz, Esq., Jenner &a;
84 F.Supp.2d 759 (2000) The UNIVERSITY OF WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Plaintiff, v. Kurt L. VanVOORHIES, Defendant, v. West Virginia University Research Corporation, et al. No. CIV. A. 1:97-CV-144. United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia, Martinsburg Division. February 17, 2000. *760 Andrew G. Fusco, The Fus
Janklow v. Viking Presspublic domain
DOBBERPUHL, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal of a summary judgment against the plaintiff, William Janklow (Janklow), in favor of the defendants, Peter Matthiessen (Matthiessen) and Viking Press (Viking). The underlying action is based on libel. Janklow claims that Matth-iessen, as the author, and Viking, as the publisher, included libelous statements within the book In the Spirit of Crazy Horse. We affirm.
831 F.Supp. 94 (1993) CYBERCHRON CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. CALLDATA SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT, INC., Defendant. No. CV 90-4358 (ADS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. August 30, 1993. *95 Wickwire Gavin, Vienna, VA (Jeffrey G. Gilmore, L. James D'Agostino, of counsel), for plaintiff. *9
Connell v. St. Francis Monasterypublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Nicholas A. Clemente, J. St. Anthony’s High School is owned and operated by the St. Francis Monastery, a religious corporation. The high school, one of the five in the Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, New York (Diocese), had been located in Huntington, New York, until and including the 1983-1984 school year. In the fall of 1983 the Bishop of the Diocese determi
701 F.Supp.2d 863 (2009) A.A., by and through his parents and legal guardians, Michelle BETENBAUGH and Kenney Arocha; Michelle Betenbaugh, individually; and Kenney Arocha, individually, Plaintiffs, v. NEEDVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. Civil Action No. H-08-2934. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. January 20, 2009.
Scull v. Scullpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Fein, J. During the course of a 30-year marriage, the parties, who separated in 1974, earned a reputation as patrons of the fine arts, amassing a valued collection of contemporary works of art. In addition to $1,300 per week in alimony plus health insurance and legal fees, the trial court in this action awarded plaintiff wife sole title to six identified works of art and the proceeds fro
Goodman v. Goodmanpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Bloom, J. Plaintiff (Shelby) is a citizen of the United States. Defendant (Barney) is a British subject, having been born in Leicester, England. The two intermarried in 1963 in the City of London. Until September, 1975 they resided in England. At that time they removed to this State. To complete the domestic picture the parties adopted a child in 1969. Although they were then legally