⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

2 opinions for “Janis v. Dearborn Moving & Storage, Inc.”

Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015-08-19 · Published · cited 44× · 869 N.W.2d 863; 2015 Minn. LEXIS 469
OPINION ANDERSON, Justice. The question presented by this case is whether the good-faith, exception to the exclusionary rule articulated in Davis v. United States, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2419, 180 L.Ed.2d 285 (2011), should apply in Minnesota. Appellant/cross-respondent Bonnie Ann Lindquist was convicted of third-degree driving while impaired (DWI). At trial, the district court admitted test results sh
M.D. v. Abbottpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015-12-17 · Published · cited 6× · 152 F. Supp. 3d 684; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168621; 2015 WL 9244873
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND VERDICT OF THE COURT Janis Graham Jack, Senior United States District Judge Named Plaintiffs brought this class action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against officials of the State of Texas. Plaintiffs claim that Texas violates their Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process rights, including “the right to be reasonably safe from harm while in government custody and the right to receive