Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Janice Smith Johnston”
Johnston v. Tuechepublic domain
SHARP, W., J. Johnston appeals a final judgment and order which granted Tueche’s motion for a *1283directed verdict and increased the damage award on past medical expenses. Tueche and Johnston were involved in a minor motor vehicle accident, caused when Johnston’s vehicle went through a stop sign as she was attempting to light a cigarette. In granting the motion, t
FILED Jan 24 2024, 8:34 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
ORDER IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) This appeal is scheduled for oral argument on Wednesday, October 3, 2001, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 201. (2) Counsel for each side shall have 30 minutes to argue their case. (3) Counsel shall provide the clerk with the names of the arguing attorneys no later than September 10, 2001.
285 F.3d 1046 JOHNSON & JOHNSTON ASSOCIATES INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,v.R.E. SERVICE CO., INC. and Mark Frater, Defendants-Appellants. No. 99-1076. No. 99-1179. No. 99-1180. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: March 28, 2002. Donald R. Du
Wright v. Sheppard-Oswaldpublic domain
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Reed Anthony Kevin Wright appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendants on Wright’s third amended complaint alleging false arrest and malicious prosecution, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and malicious prosecut
United States v. Smithpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge Defendant Billy Ray Smith has filed pro se two motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate.the sentence imposed upon him for his supervised release violation, alleging that he is actually innocent and that the court lacked jurisdiction to impose that sentence. The government opposes Smith’s motion
Johnston v. Statepublic domain
863 So.2d 271 (2003) Ray Lamar JOHNSTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. SC01-1914. Supreme Court of Florida. October 16, 2003. *274 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Steven L. Bolotin, Assistant Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, FL, for Appellant. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney Gener
Stephen W. Smith and Cynthia Dodd A/K/A Cynthia Smith v. Robert R. Pena and the United States Armypublic domain
621 F.2d 873 Stephen W. SMITH and Cynthia Dodd a/k/a Cynthia Smith,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Robert R. PENA and the United States Army, Defendants-Appellees. No. 79-1397. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Oct. 29, 1979.Decided May 8, 1980. Janice Metros Johnston, McHenry, Ill., for p
James v. Jamespublic domain
STUMBO, Justice. We granted discretionary review in this case to once again address the issue of whether and under what circumstances an injured party may aggregate or “stack” underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage. Specifically, we resolve the question of whether guest passengers who are not members of the insured’s household may stack UIM coverage on all policies issued to the owner of the vehicle. This c
Johnston v. Amsted Industries, Inc.public domain
830 P.2d 1141 (1992) Christopher M. JOHNSTON and Janice Johnston, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, and South Bend Lathe, Inc., an Indiana corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91CA0230. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V. April 9, 1992. *1142 Kathleen McWhirter Emmett, James F. Frost, Den
Mills v. Abbottpublic domain
350 S.W.3d 813 (2011) Melbourne MILLS, Jr; Bertha Darlene La; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.; and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellants, v. Mildred ABBOTT; Lisa Abraham; Juanita Alton; Joann Alvey; Cindy Armstrong; Linda Back; Carla Baldwin; Lee Bartley, Jr; Patricia Belcher; Leisa Belding: Eleanor Berry; Margie Berry; Carol Boggs; Angie Bowman; James Branham; Kathy Branham; Norma Brewer; Karen Brown; Deborah Browning; Nathaniel Brumfield, on behalf
Biser v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER IRENE C. BERGER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA The Court has reviewed M&T Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 37), M&T Bank’s Brief in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 38), the Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 43), an
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-09-00249-CV ELIZABETH ANN LINDLEY, NOT APPELLANT INDIVIDUALLY, BUT SOLELY IN HER CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF NAN DAWS, DECEASED V. J. ROSS MCKNIGHT, PAUL APPELLEES COWAN, PRYOR COWAN, JEFF M. GLAZNER, JANICE A. GLAZNER, JOHN E. GRAY, RAELYNN GRAY,
Hysmith v. Statepublic domain
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Acting Chief Judge. Hysmith appeals from a judgment and sentence imposed on him for the first degree misdemeanor of resisting an officer without violence to his person. Section 843.02, Florida Statutes (1977). There is no merit in Hysmith’s attack on the judgment. Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978). There is merit, however, in Hysmith’s contention that the court erred in imposing an ext
Novak v. Mentor Worldwide LLCpublic domain
Nancy Torresen, United States Chief District Judge In this products liability action, Plaintiff Janice Novak ("Ms. Novak ") has asserted nine claims related to injuries that she allegedly sustained from a transobturator sling called ObTape (the "ObTape ") manufactured by Defendant Mentor Worldwide LLC ("Mentor "). This matter comes before me on Mentor's motion for summary judgment.
McGEE, Judge. At all times relevant to this appeal, Highmark Properties, LLC (“Borrower”) was a company involved in real estate development. Mitchell Blevins, Cynthia Blevins, Charles Williams, and Janice Williams (“Guarantors” and, together with Borrower, “Defendants”), were Borrower’s members. High Point Bank and Trust Company (“Plaintiff’) was a financial institution, with its principal place of business in Guilford County,
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Arizona Corp. Commissionpublic domain
174 Ariz. 216 (1992) 848 P.2d 301 STATE of Arizona, ex rel., Robert L. CORBIN, The Attorney General; US West New Vector Group, Inc., a Colorado corporation; Citizens Utilities Company, a Delaware corporation; Phelps Dodge Corporation, a New York corporation; Morenci Water & Electric Company, an Arizona corporation; AJO Improvement Company, an Arizona corporation; Alltel Corporation, a Delaware corporation; CP National Corporat
State v. Santospublic domain
870 A.2d 1029 (2005) STATE v. Idalio Fernandes SANTOS. No. 2001-516-C.A. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. March 16, 2005. *1030 Christopher R. Bush, Esq., for Plaintiff. Janice M. Weisfeld, Esq., Providence, for Defendant. Present: WILLIAMS, C.J., GOLDBERG, FLAHERTY, SUTTELL, and ROBINSON, JJ. OPINION<
Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 177 Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS I attest to the accuracy and DIVISION IV integrity of this document No. CV-20-490 2023.06.26 15:34:20 -05'00' 2023.001.20174 OPINION DELIVERED: APRIL 21, 2021 MICHAEL GORDIN MADDIN APPELLANT