Cases

JANICE CLABORNE AND * NO. 2023-CA-0214 SHERYL JONES * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * THE HOUSING AUTHORITY FOURTH CIRCUIT OF NEW ORLEANS * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM

PER CURIAM: This appeal consolidates forty-eight individual appeals arising out of multidistrict litigation in In re Denture Cream Products Liability Litigation, 1:09-md-02051-CMA. In their complaints, Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants produced a denture cream that caused Plaintiffs to develop a condition known as copper deficiency myelopathy. In 2015, the district court issued an order granting De

People v Jones (2024 NY Slip Op 06059) People v Jones 2024 NY Slip Op 06059 Decided on December 4, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-KA-01008-SCT JANICE MICHELLE WILCHER a/k/a JANICE WILCHER v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/12/2015 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARCUS D. GORDON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: SCOTT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: JERRY L. BUSTIN RICHARD POOLE NOEL, III

OPINION D. MICHAEL SWINEY, C.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which J. STEVEN STAFFORD, P.J.W.S. and JOHN W. MCCLARTY, J., joined. Kimberly E. Lapinsky (“Plaintiff”) appeals the order of the Chancery Court for Sevier County (“the Trial Court”) granting summary judgment to Janice E. Cook,

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00175-CV MOTE RESOURCES, INC. AND APPELLANTS JOHN PHILLIP MOTE V. CHARLES T. GARDNER AND APPELLEES JANICE MARIE GARDNER ---------- FROM

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 16, 2013 Session JANICE HARTLINE v. ROBERT STEPHEN HARTLINE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Bradley County No. 2011-CV-137 Jerri S. Bryant, Chancellor No. E2012-02593-COA-R3-CV-FILED-JANUARY 13, 2014 In this domestic relations action, the trial court granted Wife a divorce on fault-based gro

212 F.3d 199 (3rd Cir. 2000) PHYLLIS JASKEY JONES; PAMELA JO SWANSINGER; SANDRA JASKEY HUJARSKI; PATRICIA HUJARSKI; JANICE JASKEY BUTVIN; FRANK BUTVIN; ROBERT BUTVIN; BRIAN BUTVIN; SUSAN BUTVIN; WALTER ANIELSKI; ARLENE VANS; YVONNE VANS BEKOSCKE; ANTHONY VANS; GREGORY VANS; CAROL SCHULTZ; MARY SCHAFFER; BRITTANY CULL; AMANDA SCHAFFER; IVAN SCHAFFER; STEPHANIE SCHAFFER; THERESA HUJARSKI ROSS, Appellantsv.CHEMETRON CORPORATION

72 F.3d 341 64 USLW 2404, 28 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 358, Bankr.L. Rep. P 76,727,26 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,364 CHEMETRON CORPORATIONv.Phyllis Jaskey JONES; Pamela Jo Swansinger; Sandra JaskeyHujarski; Patricia Hujarski; Teresa Hujarski Ross; JaniceJaskey Butvin; Frank Butvin; Robert Butvin; Brian Butvin;Susan Butvin; Walter Anielski; Arlene Vans; Yvonne VansBekoscke; Anthony Vans; Gregory

SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J., DISSENTING: {¶ 35} Unfortunately, we are back where we started. State v. Jones , 2016-Ohio-7702, 76 N.E.3d 596 (" Jones II" ), should remain the decision in this case, and the

329 S.E.2d 794 (1985) James Edward JONES v. Janice O. ROBINSON. Thomas Cameron WHITEMAN v. Mary Lee KELLEY. Michael L. VIVIER v. Ann PAGE. Record Nos. 820855, 821373 and 821808. Supreme Court of Virginia. April 26, 1985. *796 G. Warthen Downs, Richmond, for appellant in No. 820855. Donald W. Lemons,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EDWARD HAROLD SCHAD, No. 13-16978 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. and 2:13-cv-01962- ROS ROBERT GLEN JONES, JR., Intervenor-Plaintiff, OPINION v. JANICE K. BREWER, Governor o

[Cite as Salmons v. Jones, 2013-Ohio-5417.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAWRENCE COUNTY GLENNA SALMONS, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 13CA11 vs.

[Cite as State v. Jones, 2016-Ohio-5923.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 103290 and 103302 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

The Supreme Court of South Carolina The State, Respondent, v. Timothy Ray Jones Jr., Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2019-001008 ORDER After careful consideration of Appellant's petition for rehearing, the Court grants the petition for rehearing on Issue I, dispenses with further briefing, and substitutes the attached opinion for the opinion previously filed in this matter. The Court denies

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. Timothy Ray Jones Jr., Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2019-001008 Appeal from Lexington County Eugene C. Griffith Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28145 Heard November 9, 2021 – Filed March 29, 2023 AFFIRME

[Cite as State v. Jones, 2016-Ohio-7702.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 103290 and 103302 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

TIMOTHY M. BURGESS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1162TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ...1162 II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND ...1163 III. GOVERNING LAW ...1166 IV. RELEVANT FACTS .

170 B.R. 83 (1994) In re ALLEGHENY INTERNATIONAL, INC., Sunbeam Corporation, Sunbeam Holdings, Inc., Almet/Lawnlite, Inc. and Chemetron Corporation, Debtors. CHEMETRON CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Phyllis Jaskey JONES, et al., Appellees. Civ. A. No. 93-1582. Bankruptcy No. 88-448. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. June 14, 1994.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT BARRY LEE JONES, No. 18-99006 Petitioner-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 4:01-cv-00592-TMB DAVID SHINN, Director; STEPHEN MORRIS, Warden, OPINION Arizona State Prison-Eyman Complex, Respondents-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Dis