Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Janice Garrett”
NO. 12-04-00344-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS
Conklin v. Garrettpublic domain
179 S.W.3d 676 (2005) Shannon CONKLIN and Texas Department of Public Safety, Appellants, v. Janice GARRETT, Appellee. No. 12-04-00344-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Tyler. October 31, 2005. *677 Kamilla Stokes, for appellant. Timothy B. Garrigan, Stuckey & Garrigan, Nacogdoches, for appellee. Panel consisted of
Jones v. Garrettpublic domain
92 S.W.3d 835 (2002) James Lee JONES, III, et al. v. Pierce Brandon GARRETT a/k/a Perry Garrett. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Knoxville. November 7, 2002 Session.[1] December 30, 2002. *836 Douglas R. Beier, Morristown, Tennessee, for the appellant, Pierce Brandon Garrett. Jonathan R. Perry and Laura D. Perry,
James Jones v. Pierce Garrett a/k/a Perry Garrettpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 7, 2002 Session Heard at Cleveland1 JAMES LEE JONES, III, ET AL. v. PIERCE BRANDON GARRETT a/k/a PERRY GARRETT Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for Hamblen County No. 98-CV-059 Kind
United States v. Garrettpublic domain
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge, with whom O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, joins, concurring: I agree with most of what is said in the perspicacious majority opinion. It is, therefore, with some hesitation that I write this concurrence. I do so because there has been a good deal of tension in Ninth Circuit law regarding the proper approach to cases where new counsel is sought at a time that would require a continuanc
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Floyd Lentellis GARRETT, Defendant-Appellantpublic domain
149 F.3d 1018 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5576, 98 Daily JournalD.A.R. 7783UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Floyd Lentellis GARRETT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-50609. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1997.Decided July 16, 1998. Janice D. Hogan, S
State v. Garrettpublic domain
331 S.W.3d 392 (2011) STATE of Tennessee v. Jeremy GARRETT. No. W2007-02700-SC-R11-CD. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Jackson. November 3, 2010 Session. January 24, 2011. *395 James E. Thomas (on appeal), Memphis, Tennessee, and Tyrone Paylor and Robin Steward (at trial), Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Je
Rodney Joe Garrett v. Statepublic domain
ACCEPTED 04-15-00289-CR FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 11/9/2015 2:43:45 PM
Jewell Lee Thomas v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Order entered September 29, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00471-CR No. 05-21-00472-CR JEWELL LEE THOMAS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court
Neil Paul Noble v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Order entered August 17, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00326-CR NEIL PAUL NOBLE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas
Janice W. Winkler v. Charles S. Winklerpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 3, 2011 Session JANICE W. WINKLER v. CHARLES S. WINKLER Appeal from the Chancery Court of Rutherford County No. 09-0951DR Royce Taylor, Judge No. M2010-01821-
Vanderburg v. Garrettpublic domain
OPINION This is a suit for damages for personal injuries by appellant, a guest in the car driven by appellee. The trial court granted appellee's motion for summary judgment. Appellant presents one point of error divided into two parts, as follows: "POINT OF ERROR "THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST APPELLANT FOR THE REASON THAT THERE WAS EVIDENCE WHICH, WHEN VIEWED IN THE LIGHT MOST FAVORABLE TO APPEL
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 25, 2011 Session JANICE BROOKS, ET AL. v. RIVERTOWN ON THE ISLAND HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION, INC. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-10-1088-2 Arnold B. Goldin, Chancellor No. W2011-00326-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 6, 2011 Appellee f
Eduardo Salinas v. Statepublic domain
Order entered July 3, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01665-CR No. 05-13-01666-CR EDUARDO SALINAS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Alvin Freeman v. Janice K. Stewartpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 14, 2004 Session ALVIN FREEMAN, ET AL. v. JANICE STEWART, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Sullivan County No. 31435(M) John S. McLellan, III, Judge No. E2003-02285-COA-R3-CV - FILED JULY 27, 2004 Janice K. Stewart (“Mrs. Stewart”) was the record owner of a parcel of
Jeremy Deandre Taylor v. Statepublic domain
Order entered May 6, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01369-CR No. 05-13-01370-CR JEREMY DEANDRE TAYLOR, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appe
Julio Ivan Bautista v. Statepublic domain
Order entered August 3, 2017 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00295-CR JULIO IVAN BAUTISTA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District
Crystal Lively v. Statepublic domain
Order entered April 11, 2013 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00096-CR No. 05-13-00097-CR CRYSTAL LIVELY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
OPINION JANICE M. HOLDER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CORNELIA A. CLARK, C.J., and GARY R. WADE, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined. While working for a law firm in which he was a shareholder, an attorney performed legal services for clients and failed to remit fees owed
Darren Dwyone Green v. Statepublic domain
Order entered April 1, 2014 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00218-CR DARREN DWYONE GREEN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4