Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Janice Adams Marshall”
McNeail-Tunstall v. Marshall USApublic domain
307 F.Supp.2d 955 (2004) Janice MCNEAIL-TUNSTALL, Plaintiff, v. MARSH USA, Fred Higgins, and Mark Overheim, Defendants. No. 02-2788-DA. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. March 8, 2004. *956 *957 *958
Janice L. Ruiz v. Butts Foods, L.P.public domain
04/14/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 11, 2024 Session JANICE L. RUIZ v. BUTTS FOODS, L.P., ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 81762 Steven W. Maroney, Chancellor ___________________________________
Marshall v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.public domain
2 Cal.4th 1045 (1992) 832 P.2d 573 10 Cal. Rptr.2d 72 LINDA BROWN MARSHALL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. S022055. Supreme Court of California. July 9, 1992. *1048 COUNSEL Greene, Broillet
Adams v. Star Enterprisepublic domain
51 F.3d 417 40 ERC 1513, 63 USLW 2651, 25 Envtl.L. Rep. 21,122 Nolan J. ADAMS; John G. Aiken, 4th; Adele C. Aiken; CraigAlderman, Jr.; Ronnie Alderman; Michael J. Alexander;Margaret Alexander; Peter W. Almquist; Karen G. Almquist;Joseph J. Angelo; Donald S. Arnstein; Elaine P. Arnstein;Robert A. Aserkoff; Francine R. Aserkoff; Richard AlbertAtwell; Mary E. Delaney; Alexander J. Balen
Adams v. Star Enterprisepublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge LAY wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Senior Judge PHILLIPS joined. OPINION DONALD P. LAY, Senior Circuit Judge: BACKGROUND Star Enterprise1 operates an oil distribution facility in Fairfax, Virginia. The Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) determined in April 1992 that
137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT
Opinion issued January 30, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00331-CV ——————————— IN THE ESTATE OF LARRY WAYNE EWERS, DECEASED On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 Harris County,
United States v. Thomas Reedy and Janice Reedypublic domain
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Thomas and Janice Reedy appeal their convictions of, and sentences for, transporting “visual depictions” of “minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252, and transporting “child pornography,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A. Websites specializing in child pornography paid the Reedys a portion of their profits t
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
Adams v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.public domain
JUSTICE FREEMAN delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, Christy Adams, as special administrator of the estate of Janice Adams, brought a wrongful-death action in the circuit court of Cook County against Northern Illinois Gas Company (NI-Gas). The circuit court granted NI-Gas’ motion for summary judgment. The appellate court reve
899 P.2d 621 (1995) Vaughn G. MARSHALL and Rene A. Marshall, Appellants, v. FENTON, FENTON, SMITH, RENEAU AND MOON, P.C., a professional corporation practicing law, and Tom E. Mullen, a lawyer, Appellees. No. 78688. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. June 27, 1995. Bryce A. Baggett, Oklahoma City, for appellants. *622 Murray E. Ab
Adams v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.public domain
Docket No. 94748–Agenda 23–September 2003. CHRISTY ADAMS, Special Adm’r of the Estate of Janice Adams, Deceased, Appellee, v. NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY, Appellant. Opinion filed April 1, 2004. JUSTICE FREEMAN delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, Christy Adams, as special administrator of the estate of Janice Adams, brought a wrongful-death action in the circuit court of Co
Wilson Ex Rel. Adams v. Cahokia School District 187public domain
470 F.Supp.2d 897 (2007) Brenda WILSON, as mother and next friend of Teniesha ADAMS, a minor, Plaintiff, v. CAHOKIA SCHOOL DISTRICT # 187, Lela Prince, Dwayne Cotton, Mearl Justus, and County of St Clair, Illinois, Defendants. Civil No. 05-297-GPM. United States District Court, S.D. Illinois. January 19, 2007. *898
Bayless v. Crabtree Through Adamspublic domain
108 B.R. 299 (1989) Bobbie G. BAYLESS, Trustee on Behalf of the Bankruptcy Estates of Freeman Dale Crabtree, Linda Catherine Crabtree, the Orchard Company, Catherine Dianne Crabtree Trust and David Lynn Crabtree Trust, Plaintiffs, v. Catherine Dianne CRABTREE, Through Catherine ADAMS Guardian of Her Estate and David Lynn Crabtree, Defendant. Adv. No. 88-0281-TS, Bankruptcy Nos. 87-9110-TS, 87-9114-TS, No. CIV-89-1337-A.
OPINION JANICE M. HOLDER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., and CORNELIA A. CLARK, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ„ joined. A law firm filed suit against a former partner and a former paralegal. Both former employees filed motions to compel arbitration. The
Lazar v. JW ALUMINUMpublic domain
346 S.W.3d 438 (2011) Robert LAZAR v. J.W. ALUMINUM. No. W2010-00659-SC-R3-WC. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Jackson. April 6, 2011 Session. July 26, 2011. *440 Blakely D. Matthews and J. Cole Dowsley, Jr., Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, J.W. Aluminum. George L. Morrison III and Spencer Barnes,
Kotler v. American Tobacco Co.public domain
731 F.Supp. 50 (1990) Joanne KOTLER, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of George P. Kotler, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN TOBACCO CO. et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 86-0810-S. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 12, 1990. Eric Nissen, Nissen & Lumsden, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff. Bruce G. Sheffler, John Delli Venneri and Tho
Durham v. Statepublic domain
Hunstein, Chief Justice. A jury convicted Albert Durham of malice murder and other crimes in connection with the shooting death of George McCrary.1 On appeal, Durham contends that the State elicited improper hearsay testimony, the trial court failed to give a complete charge on circumstantial evidence, and trial counsel was ineffective. Because the trial court did not commit reversible error in its
United States v. State of Idahopublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35440 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35450 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO
23 F.3d 878 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Janice McMANUS, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Alton Ray TRUESDALE, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Tennison Alexander HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Alvin TRUESDALE, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appelle