Cases

FILED January 18, 2023 STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIR

RILEY, Chief Judge. Pro se petitioner Eugene R. Robinson seeks review of three final orders issued by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), designating certain information Sensitive Security Information (SSI). Under the terms of a protective order in Robinson’s ongoing employment discrimination lawsuit against Secretary Janet Napolitano, the Department of Homeland Se

EVANDER, J. Janet Robinson appeals from a Second Final Judgment of Dissolution of Mar*974riage. We address two issues. First, as conceded by the former husband, a mathematical error resulted in the former husband receiving $67,840 more net assets than the former wife. On remand, the trial court shall correct this discrepancy. Second, as again con

ORDER AND REASONS NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, District Judge. This case is about whether a school system unconstitutionally and tortiously adjudicated allegations that one of its students misbehaved during a field trip. Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment1 filed by Defendants St. Tammany *839Paris

SAUFLEY, C.J. [¶1] Kevin Robinson appeals from a judgment of conviction entered by the trial court (Penobscot County, Jordan, J. ) after a jury found him guilty of two counts of aggravated trafficking of scheduled drugs (Class A), 17-A M.R.S. § 1105-A(1)(B)(1) (2018). Robinson challenges the court's initial instructions to the jury and the process employed in the polling of the jurors. We affirm the judgment.

Jeffrey Gerrish, Attorney at Law, James P. Cooney, III, Attorney at Law, Charlotte, NC, Gregory B. Craig, Attorney at Law, Alex T. Haskell, Attorney at Law, For Former Senior U.S. Military Officials John R. Mills, Attorney at Law, For Experts in Law and Implicit Bias James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, For Becton, Charles, et al. Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, For Professors John Charles Boger &a;

Jeffrey Gerrish, James P. Cooney, III, Charlotte, Gregory B. Craig, Alex T. Haskell, Attorneys at Law, For Former Senior U.S. Military Officials John R. Mills, Attorney at Law, For Experts in Law and Implicit Bias James E. Coleman, Jr., Attorney at Law, For Becton, Charles, et al. Robert P. Mosteller, Attorney at Law, For Professors John Charles Boger & Robert P. Mosteller Grady Jessup,

PITMAN, J. Defendant Antonio D. Robinson appeals as excessive his sentences for attempted possession of a Schedule II controlled dangerous substance in Counts One and Two and attempted possession of a firearm or carrying a concealed weapon by a convicted felon in Count Three. For the following reasons, Defendant's sentences for Counts One and Two are vacated and remanded for resentencing. The conviction and sentence for Count Three

PITMAN, J. Defendant Antonio D. Robinson appeals as excessive his sentences for attempted possession of a Schedule II controlled dangerous substance in Counts One and Two and attempted possession of a firearm or carrying a concealed weapon by a convicted felon in Count Three. For the following reasons, Defendant's sentences for Counts One and Two are vacated and remanded for resentencing. The conviction and sentence for Count Three

*379The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by North Carolina Council of Churches for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of July 2018."Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times all

*388The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. to admit W. Kerrel Murray Pro Hac Vice:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of July 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of July 2018 by National Association for Public Defense for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:*363"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of May 2017 by Charles Becton, Charles Daye, Valerie Johnson, Irving L. Joyner, Floyd B. McKissick, Jr., Cressie H. Thigpen, Jr., and Fred J. Williams for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the tim

*369The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th of July 2018 by Professors John Charles Boger and Robert P. Mosteller for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th of July 2018."Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court w

643 F.Supp.2d 934 (2009) Dean Allan ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. Blaine C. LAFLER, Respondent. No. 1:08-cv-1208. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 3, 2009. *936 Dean Allan Robinson, Carson City, MI, pro se. OPINION JANET T. NEFF, District Judge. This is a ha

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 21st of June 2018 by Defendant:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of June 2018."Defendant shall have up to and including the 16th day of July 2018 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th of July 2018 by North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of July 2018."

Mr. William R. West, District Attorney, for State *685The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th of July 2018 by Former State and Federal Prosecutors to admit Robert L. Walker Pro Hac Vice:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 20th of July 2018."

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th of May 2017 by North Carolina Advocates for Justice for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st of March 2018."Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i).

The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 13th of March 2018 by Defendant:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of March 2018."