Cases

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D2024-2265 L.T. Case No. 42-2023-DR-4317 _____________________________ JUDITH JANET JIMENEZ, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o Ismael Perez, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Ann Melinda Craggs, Judge. Judith

Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas JUDGMENT Edwin Bryant Wade, Janet Lynn Wade, and Appeal from the 336th District Court of Jeremy Wade, Appellants Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CV-23- 46149). Panel consists of Chief Justice No. 06-23-00095-CV v.

In the Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-23-00095-CV EDWIN BRYANT WADE, JANET LYNN WADE, AND JEREMY WADE, Appellants V. MCLANE COMPANY, INC., AND JOSE EFRAIN PEREZ, JR., Appellees On Appeal from the 336th District Court Fannin County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-

Sanders, Janet L., J. This case presents the question of how long and under what circumstances an individual may be detained in order for police to confirm or dispel their suspicion that he is carrying illegal narcotics inside his body. In the instant case, the defendant was held for more than three days under 24-hour guard in an Everett hospital without access to a lawyer and with no determination that there was probable cause

468 F.Supp.2d 1127 (2006) Janet PEREZ-ENCINAS and Wendy Perez, Plaintiffs, v. AMERUS LIFE INSURANCE CO., Defendant. No. C 05-05112 CRB. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 26, 2006. *1128 *1129 *1130 Hugo Torbet, Attorney at Law, San Francis

ORDER HAYES, District Judge: The matter before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Janet Na-politano, Alan Bersin, David Aguilar, Michael Fisher, and Chad Nelson. (ECF No. 65). I. Background On June 17, 2018, Plaintiffs Maria Del Socorro Quintero Perez, the widow of Jesus Alfredo Yáñez Reyes (‘Yáñez”), and

HERNANDEZ, District Judge: In this wage action brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (FLSA), Plaintiff Thomas Perez, the United States Secretary of Labor, brings three claims against Defendants Oak Grove Cinemas, Inc., Barrington Management LLC, Barrington Venture LLC, and David Emami. Plaintiff first brings a claim against all Defendants for failure to pay overtime wages to thirty-five individuals

745 F.Supp.2d 948 (2010) Jose BAUTISTA-PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, and Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security, Defendants. No. C07-4192 TEH. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 15, 2010. *949 Jonathan Myles Kaufman, The Law Offices of Jon

131 P.3d 168 (2006) 340 Or. 310 STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on Review, v. Richard Lawrence PEREZ, Respondent on Review. (CC 0201-30132; CA A119741; SC S52267). Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued and Submitted September 9, 2005. Decided March 30, 2006. Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for p

681 F.Supp.2d 1083 (2009) Jose BAUTISTA-PEREZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, and Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security, Defendants. No. C 07-4192 TEH. United States District Court, N.D. California. May 1, 2009. *1084 Jonathan Myles Kaufman, The Law Offices of Jonatha

102 P.3d 705 (2004) 196 Or. App. 364 STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. Richard Lawrence PEREZ, Appellant. 0201-30132; A119741. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted September 21, 2004. Decided December 8, 2004. *706 Ernest G. Lannet, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for ap

522 S.E.2d 102 (1999) STATE of North Carolina v. Flor PEREZ, III. No. COA98-1383. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. November 16, 1999. *105 Attorney General Michael F. Easley, by Assistant Attorney General Marilyn R. Mudge, for the State. Appellate Defender Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr., by Assistant Appellate Defender Janet M

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated February 25, 1997, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion for reargument and, upon reargument, denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102 (d) to the extent that the injured plaintiff was allowed t

18 F.Supp.2d 674 (1998) Hilario PEREZ v. Janet RENO, Attorney General of the United States and the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. No. EP-98-CA-214-DB. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. August 25, 1998. *675 Scott E. Segall, El Paso, Texas, for plaintiff/petitioner. James W.

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: The plaintiff in this appeal challenges the district court’s conclusion that her action against the government was time-barred. The case requires us to decide whether equitable tolling is available in tort cases against the government and whether it is applicable on the facts presented. We find it both available and applicable, and thus RE

People v Perez (2022 NY Slip Op 00286) People v Perez 2022 NY Slip Op 00286 Decided on January 18, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

People v Perez (2022 NY Slip Op 00286) People v Perez 2022 NY Slip Op 00286 Decided on January 18, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4

People v Perez (2022 NY Slip Op 01104) People v Perez 2022 NY Slip Op 01104 Decided on February 17, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

PER CURIAM: Guillermo Perez has appealed the district court’s judgment dismissing his habe-as petition for failure to state a claim. Perez contends that Section 212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h), as amended (pertaining to eligibility for waiver of inadmissibility), is unconstitutional because it disting

(2008) Aixa PEREZ-LANG, on her behalf, as personal representative of the estate of Edward Lang—Correa and as mother and natural guardian of her daughters Diana Camila Lang and Sofia Lang, Plaintiff, v. CORPORACION DE HOTELES, S.A., doing business as Hotel Casa De Campo, Corporacion de Hoteles Casa de Campo, Casa de Campo, Central Romana Corporation, Premier World Marketing, Inc., Premier Resorts & Hotels Group, and ABC Corporations, Defendant