Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Janet M Meyers”
Ron Meyers v. Tom Roypublic domain
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Ron Meyers, a person required to register as a “predatory offender” in Minnesota, brought this action against two state officials, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He asserts that the enforcement of Minnesota’s predatory offender registration statute, Minn.Stat. § 243.166, violates his constitutional right to due process.
Janet Hurst v. Kansas City, Missouri School Districtpublic domain
JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge. Appellant Kansas City, Missouri School District (“the District”) appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County in favor of Respondent Janet Hurst in the amount of $247,083.78 in actual damages and $200,000.00 in punitive damages. The award resulted from a suit filed by Respondent alleging that the District discriminated against he
People v. Meyerspublic domain
JUSTICE FREEMAN delivered the opinion of the court: The State appeals from a judgment of the circuit court of Cook County dismissing the separate misdemeanor complaints against defendants, Janet Meyers, Joanne Barnard and Nancy Barnard (defendants), for their alleged violation of section 235b of the Revenue Act of 1939 (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 120, par. 716d).
Matter of Mackauer v. Meyerspublic domain
Matter of Mackauer v Meyers (2020 NY Slip Op 03786) Matter of Mackauer v Meyers 2020 NY Slip Op 03786 Decided on July 8, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua
Meyers v. Kishimotopublic domain
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Haight, Senior District Judge Plaintiff Paul F. Meyers brings this action against Defendant the City of Hartford and various individuals (collectively, “Individual Defendants”).1 Plaintiff alleges that he was improperly terminated as a physical education teacher at the Simpson Waverly School in Hartford, CT. Spe
Janet Doe v. City of Memphis, Tennesseepublic domain
11/26/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 9, 2024 Session JANET DOE V. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-003516-14 Gina C. Higgins, Judge No.
Janet Doe v. City of Memphis, Tennesseepublic domain
11/26/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 9, 2024 Session JANET DOE V. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-003516-14 Gina C. Higgins, Judge No. W2023-01248-COA-R9-CV Shor
Shane Roy Needham v. Janet Lea Needhampublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 53034 SHANE ROY NEEDHAM, ) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) Lewiston, April 2026 Term ) v. ) Opinion Fi
Meyers v. LAKELAND SUPPLY, INC.public domain
133 F.Supp.2d 1118 (2001) Elmer C. MEYERS, Plaintiff, v. LAKELAND SUPPLY, INC., Defendant. No. 00-C-1372. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. March 27, 2001. Janet L. Heins, Heins Law Office, Mequon, WI,, for Plaintiff. *1119 DECISION AND ORDER DATED DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JURY TRIAL AS TO DAMAG
Faria J. Simmons v. Nicole M. Chacepublic domain
APPEALS COURT FARIA J. SIMMONS vs. NICOLE M. CHACE Docket: 23-P-644 Dates: April 1, 2024 – May 16, 2025 Present: Henry,
Janet Clanton Leonard v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-04-00012-CR ___________________
Hirtenstein v. Cempra, Inc.public domain
Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge *536This is a putative federal securities class action on behalf of all persons1 who owned common stock of the biopharmaceutical company, Cempra, Inc. ("Cempra"), between July 7, 2015, and November 4, 2016 (the "class period"). In their amended complaint (Doc. 46), Plaintiffs seek recovery fo
Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. Hallpublic domain
349 S.E.2d 552 (1986) THOMAS M. McINNIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Janet H. HALL. No. 601A85. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 4, 1986. *553 Sharpe & Buckner by Richard G. Buckner, Rockingham, for plaintiff-appellee. Manning, Fulton & Skinner by Charles B. Morris, Jr., and Barry D. Mann, Raleigh, for defend
NO. 12-17-00170-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS JENNIFER SAMPSON, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH INDIVIDUALLY; AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF SINDY JEAN HAMILTON; AND AS GUARDIAN OF JEANETTE BURTON AND SONYA HOLLIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JANET MEYERS,
Meyers v. J.H.public domain
MARING, Justice. [¶ 1] J.H. (Janet),1 the mother of the minor children, L.F. (Laura) and J.F. (Jennifer), appeals from a juvenile court order terminating all of her parental rights and obligations to her two daughters. The minor children’s father, D.F. (Darrell), did not appeal the juvenile court’s decision terminating his parental rights. We conclude the juvenile court’s order terminating parent
Michael L. Pogreba v. Lorraine Pogreba, Janet Bowenpublic domain
This opinion is nonprecedential except as provided by Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 136.01, subd. 1(c). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A23-1261 Michael L. Pogreba, Respondent, vs. Lorraine Pogreba, et al
People v. Meyerspublic domain
630 N.E.2d 811 (1994) 158 Ill.2d 45 196 Ill.Dec. 646 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Janet MEYERS, et al., Appellees. Nos. 74710, 74711 and 74712. Supreme Court of Illinois. January 20, 1994. *813 Roland W. Burris, Atty. Gen., of Springfield, and Jack O'Malley, St
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge. Mr. and Mrs. Adolph K. Krause (taxpayers) appeal from a decision of the United States Tax Court, per Judge Samuel B. Sterrett, upholding the Commissioner’s determination of deficiencies in taxpayers’ federal income tax for the taxable years 1964, 1965 and 1966. We affirm. For a comprehensive statement of the facts, reference is
Bowen v. Fred Meyer Storespublic domain
123 P.3d 367 (2005) 202 Or. App. 558 In the Matter of the Compensation of Janet L. Bowen, Claimant. Janet L. BOWEN, Petitioner, v. FRED MEYER STORES, Respondent. 03-01249; A126344. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted August 8, 2005. Decided November 16, 2005. James E. Bailey, III, argued the cause for petitio
State v. Kevin M. Taylorpublic domain
May 4 2010 DA 09-0246 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2010 MT 94 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KEVIN MARK TAYLOR, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, In