⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Janet M Meyers”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013-05-10 · Published · cited 6× · 714 F.3d 1077; 2013 WL 1920730; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9547
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Ron Meyers, a person required to register as a “predatory offender” in Minnesota, brought this action against two state officials, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He asserts that the enforcement of Minnesota’s predatory offender registration statute, Minn.Stat. § 243.166, violates his constitutional right to due process.
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-04-29 · Published · cited 1× · 437 S.W.3d 327; 2014 WL 1677822; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 482; 123 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 610
JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge. Appellant Kansas City, Missouri School District (“the District”) appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County in favor of Respondent Janet Hurst in the amount of $247,083.78 in actual damages and $200,000.00 in punitive damages. The award resulted from a suit filed by Respondent alleging that the District discriminated against he
People v. Meyerspublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 1994-01-20 · Published · cited 80× · 158 Ill. 2d 46; 196 Ill. Dec. 646; 630 N.E.2d 811; 1994 Ill. LEXIS 5
JUSTICE FREEMAN delivered the opinion of the court: The State appeals from a judgment of the circuit court of Cook County dismissing the separate misdemeanor complaints against defendants, Janet Meyers, Joanne Barnard and Nancy Barnard (defendants), for their alleged violation of section 235b of the Revenue Act of 1939 (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 120, par. 716d).
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-07-08 · Published · cited 1× · 185 A.D.3d 694; 124 N.Y.S.3d 847; 2020 NY Slip Op 3786
Matter of Mackauer v Meyers (2020 NY Slip Op 03786) Matter of Mackauer v Meyers 2020 NY Slip Op 03786 Decided on July 8, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursua
Meyers v. Kishimotopublic domain
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016-11-17 · Published · cited 4× · 217 F. Supp. 3d 563; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159280; 2016 WL 6818380
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Haight, Senior District Judge Plaintiff Paul F. Meyers brings this action against Defendant the City of Hartford and various individuals (collectively, “Individual Defendants”).1 Plaintiff alleges that he was improperly terminated as a physical education teacher at the Simpson Waverly School in Hartford, CT. Spe
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-11-26 · Published · cited 0×
11/26/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 9, 2024 Session JANET DOE V. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-003516-14 Gina C. Higgins, Judge No.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-11-26 · Published · cited 0×
11/26/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 9, 2024 Session JANET DOE V. CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-003516-14 Gina C. Higgins, Judge No. W2023-01248-COA-R9-CV Shor
Idaho Supreme Court · 2026-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 53034 SHANE ROY NEEDHAM, ) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) Lewiston, April 2026 Term ) v. ) Opinion Fi
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2001-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 133 F. Supp. 2d 1118; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3596; 85 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 737; 2001 WL 293521
133 F.Supp.2d 1118 (2001) Elmer C. MEYERS, Plaintiff, v. LAKELAND SUPPLY, INC., Defendant. No. 00-C-1372. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. March 27, 2001. Janet L. Heins, Heins Law Office, Mequon, WI,, for Plaintiff. *1119 DECISION AND ORDER DATED DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JURY TRIAL AS TO DAMAG
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2025-05-16 · Published · cited 0×
APPEALS COURT FARIA J. SIMMONS vs. NICOLE M. CHACE Docket: 23-P-644 Dates: April 1, 2024 – May 16, 2025 Present: Henry,
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2004-05-12 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-04-00012-CR ___________________
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018-10-26 · Published · cited 1× · 348 F. Supp. 3d 530
Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge *536This is a putative federal securities class action on behalf of all persons1 who owned common stock of the biopharmaceutical company, Cempra, Inc. ("Cempra"), between July 7, 2015, and November 4, 2016 (the "class period"). In their amended complaint (Doc. 46), Plaintiffs seek recovery fo
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986-11-04 · Published · cited 245× · 349 S.E.2d 552; 318 N.C. 421; 1986 N.C. LEXIS 2676
349 S.E.2d 552 (1986) THOMAS M. McINNIS & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Janet H. HALL. No. 601A85. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 4, 1986. *553 Sharpe & Buckner by Richard G. Buckner, Rockingham, for plaintiff-appellee. Manning, Fulton & Skinner by Charles B. Morris, Jr., and Barry D. Mann, Raleigh, for defend
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2018-01-18 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 12-17-00170-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS JENNIFER SAMPSON, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH INDIVIDUALLY; AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF SINDY JEAN HAMILTON; AND AS GUARDIAN OF JEANETTE BURTON AND SONYA HOLLIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JANET MEYERS,
Meyers v. J.H.public domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 1998-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 580 N.W.2d 573; 1998 ND 129; 1998 N.D. LEXIS 143
MARING, Justice. [¶ 1] J.H. (Janet),1 the mother of the minor children, L.F. (Laura) and J.F. (Jennifer), appeals from a juvenile court order terminating all of her parental rights and obligations to her two daughters. The minor children’s father, D.F. (Darrell), did not appeal the juvenile court’s decision terminating his parental rights. We conclude the juvenile court’s order terminating parent
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024-05-20 · Published · cited 0×
This opinion is nonprecedential except as provided by Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 136.01, subd. 1(c). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A23-1261 Michael L. Pogreba, Respondent, vs. Lorraine Pogreba, et al
People v. Meyerspublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 1994-01-20 · Published · cited 41× · 630 N.E.2d 811; 158 Ill. 2d 45; 196 Ill. Dec. 646
630 N.E.2d 811 (1994) 158 Ill.2d 45 196 Ill.Dec. 646 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellant, v. Janet MEYERS, et al., Appellees. Nos. 74710, 74711 and 74712. Supreme Court of Illinois. January 20, 1994. *813 Roland W. Burris, Atty. Gen., of Springfield, and Jack O'Malley, St
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974-05-30 · Published · cited 15× · 497 F.2d 1109; 34 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5044; 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 8400
PHILLIPS, Chief Judge. Mr. and Mrs. Adolph K. Krause (taxpayers) appeal from a decision of the United States Tax Court, per Judge Samuel B. Sterrett, upholding the Commissioner’s determination of deficiencies in taxpayers’ federal income tax for the taxable years 1964, 1965 and 1966. We affirm. For a comprehensive statement of the facts, reference is
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005-11-16 · Published · cited 1× · 123 P.3d 367; 202 Or. App. 558; 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1504
123 P.3d 367 (2005) 202 Or. App. 558 In the Matter of the Compensation of Janet L. Bowen, Claimant. Janet L. BOWEN, Petitioner, v. FRED MEYER STORES, Respondent. 03-01249; A126344. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted August 8, 2005. Decided November 16, 2005. James E. Bailey, III, argued the cause for petitio
Montana Supreme Court · 2010-05-04 · Published · cited 0× · 2010 MT 94
May 4 2010 DA 09-0246 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2010 MT 94 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KEVIN MARK TAYLOR, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, In