Cases

972 F.2d 1304 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2313, 122 Lab.Cas. P 35,693,1 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 9 Robert A. MUNIZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.Jay E. ALBRECHT; Bert D. Alton, III; Roy L. Ashlock, Sr.;Marc Bergman; Merwyn L. Bickler; Jorge A. Blackwood;Walter Blayney, Jr.; Ervin Byler; John B. Cassidy;Eufemio R. Castillo; H.J. Chellon; Bruce A. Curry; Ralp

OPINION & ORDER SIDNEY H. STEIN, United States District Judge. Contents I. Background... 365 A. The Funds... 365 B. The Parties... 365 1. Plaintiffs... 365 2. The UBS Defendants... 366 3. The Popular Defendants... 366 4. The Individual Defendants... 367</

679 N.E.2d 882 (1997) STATE BOARD OF TAX COMMISSIONERS, Appellant (Respondent below), v. TWO MARKET SQUARE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; Duke Realty Investments, Inc.; The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States; and W.R.C. Properties, Inc., Appellees (Petitioners below). No. 49S10-9603-TA-227. Supreme Court of Indiana. May 12, 1997.

814 F.Supp. 1507 (1993) Jennifer ROBERTS, Julie Osborne, Janet Brumbelow, Laura Bielak, Sara Stout, Amy Recouper, Jennifer Jacobs, Malia Kuenzli, Stacie Stafford, Heather Nakasone, Kim Johnson, Aimee Rice, and Lisa Mize, Plaintiffs, v. COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY, Colorado State Board of Agriculture, in its capacity as the entity charged with the general control and supervision of Colorado State University, Defendants. Civ. A.

363 N.E.2d 1266 (1977) Marjorie CUMMINGS, As Administratrix of the Estate of Lloyd Cummings, Deceased, and Janet Sue Cook, As Administratrix of the Estate of James Arnold Cook, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOOSIER MARINE PROPERTIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee, Woodruff & Sons, Inc., Co-Defendant below. No. 3-1074A170. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District. June 2

9 S.W.3d 288 (1999) In re ESTATE OF Estha Cartwright DAVIS a/k/a Estha H. Davis, Deceased Roscoe Cartwright, Janet D. Delape, Wade Cartwright, and Barbara Beagle, Appellants, v. Robert B. COOK, Schreiner College, First United Methodist Church of Kerrville, Hill Country Youth Ranch, and The Attorney General of the State of Texas, Appellees. No. 04-98-00950-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.

ORFINGER, J. Robert and Janet Dingle appeal the dismissal with prejudice of their legal malpractice claims against attorney Jacqueline Dellinger and the Millhorn Law Firm, L.L.C. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. This suit arose out of the alleged failure of Dellinger to properly draft documents gifting property to the Dingles. According to the Dingles’ third amended complaint, John P. Kyreakak

Buser, J., dissenting: In a case of first impression, the majority holds that it is a per se abuse of discretion for a district court to order parenting time and visitation as mutually requested by a noncustodial parent and child. Under the tragic facts of this case, I believe the district court appropriately exercised its discretion by ordering the parenting time and visitation conditioned upon the mutual requests of David and hi

730 N.W.2d 864 (2007) 2007 ND 69 William CHAMLEY, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Inder V. KHOKHA, M.D., Mercy Medical Center, Defendants and Appellees and Salem S. Shahin, M.D., Defendant. No. 20060261. Supreme Court of North Dakota. May 8, 2007. *865 Richard H. McGee II (argued), McGee, Hankla, Backes &am;

51 F.Supp.2d 1195 (1999) Janet L. UNREIN, Plaintiff, v. PAYLESS SHOESOURCE, INC., Defendant. No. 97-4158-RDR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 3, 1999. *1196 *1197 *1198 Brenda L. Head, Davis, Unrein, Hummer, McCallister, Biggs & Head, L.L.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 108,149 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. SHAWN ROBERT SASSER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Generally, a party cannot complain on appeal about a claime

URBIGKIT, Justice, specially concurring, with whom MACY, Justice, joins. For years in Wyoming, without required count, the state bar, trial bench, and law school faculty classified this state as an evidence-of-negligence jurisdiction for application of statutory-violation rules for jury instruction. But then came Distad v. Cubin, Wyo., 633 P.2d 167 (1981). One is almost led

Case: 20-50112 Document: 00516162244 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED January 11, 2022 No. 2

FIDEL, Judge, dissenting: I concur in the majority’s decision that the will of Edward Frank Muder fails to meet the requirements of A.R.S. § 14-2502 for acceptance as a formally executed will. I dissent from the majority’s decision that the will fails to qualify for holographic validity under A.R.S. § 14-2503.1 To explain my view, I want first to consider what t

709 F.Supp.2d 1323 (2010) In re TRASYLOL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION— MDL-1928. This Document Relates To: All Actions. Case No. 08-MD-01928. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 27, 2010. *1324 Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt Johnson Osborne & LeClainche, John Scarola, Brenda S. Fulmer, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart &am;

No. 119,790 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JEREMIAH WILTON BROWN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Prosecutors commit error when they misstate the law or

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit SEP 4 1998 PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER

HENRY, Circuit Judge. A grand jury charged Defendant Christopher Smith with the following offenses: (1) interference with commerce by threats or violence, in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951; and (2) theft from a federally licensed firearms dealer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(u). A jury found him guilty on both counts. Mr. Smith contends that the district court

156 Ariz. 326 (1987) 751 P.2d 986 In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Edward Frank MUDER, Deceased. Linda LIND and Janet Hiscoe, Petitioners-Appellants, v. Retha MUDER, Respondent-Appellee. No. 1 CA-CIV 9256. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D. December 31, 1987. Review Granted April 19, 1988. Frost & Po

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 125,051 HODES & NAUSER, MDS, P.A., and TRACI LYNN NAUSER, M.D., Appellees, v. JANET STANEK, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment; STEPHEN M. HOWE, in His Official Capacity as District Attorney for Johnson County, Kansas; a