Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jane S. Pacheco”
Pacheco v. Comissepublic domain
897 F.Supp. 671 (1995) Milton Musa PACHECO, Plaintiff, v. Anita COMISSE; Thomas A. Coughlin, III; Paul Levine; John & Jane Does [S.C.F.]; John & Jane Does [Central Office]; Louis F. Mann, Defendants. No. 92-CV-1658. United States District Court, N.D. New York. August 29, 1995. *672 *673
Matter of Pacheco v. Maldonadopublic domain
Matter of Pacheco v Maldonado (2023 NY Slip Op 05735) Matter of Pacheco v Maldonado 2023 NY Slip Op 05735 Decided on November 15, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judici
Sailors v. Pachecopublic domain
[Cite as Sailors v. Pacheco, 2021-Ohio-3180.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY FRANK SAILORS, CASE NO. 2021-L-011 Plaintiff-Appellant, Civil Appeal from the -v- Court of Common Pleas JUAN C. PACHECO, a.k.a. JUAN C. P
Commonwealth v. Pachecopublic domain
By Judge Mary Jane Hall This matter comes before the Court on the Commonwealth’s Motion in Limine To Offer Evidence at Trial of Prior Criminal and Sexual Conduct by Defendant Towards [minor victim] T.G. For the reasons stated below, the Court concludes that the testimony at issue is admissible under Virginia Rule of Evidence 2:404(b). Accordingly, the Commonwealth’s Motion is granted.
Brito-Pacheco v. Tina's Hair Salonpublic domain
ALOK AHUJA, Judge. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denied workers’ compensation benefits to the dependents of Mauro Bri-*819to-Pacheco, who was murdered by a robber on August 10, 2009, while working at Tina’s Hair Salon in Kansas City. The Commission found that the Salon was not Brito-Pacheco’s statutory employer under § 287.040.1
Jane DiCocco v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 20-1342 Doc: 29 Filed: 11/17/2021 Pg: 1 of 47 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1342 JANE D. DICOCCO, MD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice
Jane DiCocco v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 20-1342 Doc: 29 Filed: 11/17/2021 Pg: 1 of 47 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1342 JANE D. DICOCCO, MD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice
Jane DiCocco v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 20-1342 Doc: 29 Filed: 11/17/2021 Pg: 1 of 47 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1342 JANE D. DICOCCO, MD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice
Jane DiCocco v. Merrick Garlandpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1342 JANE D. DICOCCO, MD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia at Richmond. J
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. This case requires us to decide whether a passenger’s state tort claim against an international air carrier was preempted by the Warsaw Convention 1 and therefore properly dismissed by the district court. For the reasons set forth below, vye vacate the district court’s judgment granting the motion to
State v. Garcia Pachecopublic domain
Office of the Director New Mexico Compilation 13:40:26 2023.10.11 Commission '00'06- IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE O
Juan Pablo Pacheco v. Statepublic domain
Opinion Issued February 2, 2006 <
William T. Malone v. Wilma Jane Malonepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-10-00083-CV ______________________________ WILLIAM T. MALONE, Appellant V. WILMA JANE MALONE, Ap
In Re: Jane Hoffmann Mouriñopublic domain
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2015 TSPR 153 194 DPR ____ Jane Hoffmann Mouriño Número del Caso: CP-2013-30 Fecha: 12 de noviembre de 2015 Abogados de la Querellada: Lcdo. Virgilio Mainardi Peralta Lcdo. José A. Rivera Rodríguez Oficina de la Procuradora General: Lcda. Karla Pacheco Álvarez Subproc
William T. Malone v. Wilma Jane Malonepublic domain
United States v. Pachecopublic domain
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH SEP 15 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
United States v. Roy Allen Pachecopublic domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendant Roy Allen Pacheco was indicted on two counts of aggravated sexual abuse of a child while in Indian Country in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153, 2241(c), 2246(2)(A), 2246(2)(C). 1 After a jury trial, Pacheco was found guilty of the digital penetration count and was acquitted of the penile
Blythe v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, District Judge. On July 16, 2008, plaintiff Kathryn Blythe brought this action against the City of New York, the New York City Department of Education (“DOE”), two employees of the DOE — Principal Rafaela Espinal-Pacheco and Assistant Principal Vicky Broadhurst — in their individual capacities (collectively “DOE defendants”), and New York Police Depar
in the Interest of S. R.- M. C.public domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00556-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/21/2015 10:14:05 PM CHRIST
Maymo-Melendez v. Alvarez-Ramirezpublic domain
373 F.3d 1 Jorge J. MAYMO-MELENDEZ, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Julio ALVAREZ-RAMIREZ; Ricardo Pacheco-Pacheco; Irba Cruz-De-Batista, Defendants, Appellants,Jane Doe 02CV2001; Conjugal Partnership Alvarez-Doe; Jane Doe 02CV2001-2; Conjugal Partnership Pacheco-Doe; John Doe 02CV2001; Conjugal Partnership Doe-Cruz; Conjugal Partnership Alves-Doe; Juan Alves-Rueda, Defendants. No. 03-1141. Unite