Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Jane E. Fairchild”
Cole v. Fairchildpublic domain
482 S.E.2d 913 (1996) 198 W.Va. 736 Lonnie COLE, Administrator of the Estate of Stephen Brant Cole II, Plaintiff Below, Appellee v. Jack Douglas FAIRCHILD, Jr., Defendant Below, Appellee, Flat Top Lake Association, a West Virginia Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff Below, Appellant, Myrleen B. Fairchild, Executrix of the Estate of Jack R. Fairchild, Intervenor Third-Party Defendant Below, Appellee.
In Re: The Adoption of Jane, a Minor: Hilda Boutwell v. Leon Fairchild and Jennifer Fairchildpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-01046-COA IN RE: THE ADOPTION OF JANE, A MINOR: APPELLANT HILDA BOUTWELL v. LEON FAIRCHILD AND JENNIFER APPELLEES FAIRCHILD DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/10/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DAVID SHOEMAKE COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JEFFERSON DAVIS COU
Freeman v. Fairchildpublic domain
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'04- 16:10:40 2018.05.01 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number
Kaliski v. Fairchild Republic Co.public domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (151 AD2d 867). Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Jane Doe 1 v. Licatepublic domain
[Cite as Jane Doe 1 v. Licate, 2019-Ohio-412.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO JANE DOE 1, et al., : OPINION Plaintiffs-Appellees, : CASE NOS. 2018-A-0019 - vs - : 20
Goldstein v. Group Insurance Plan for Administrative & Management Employees of Fairchild Republic Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GLEESON, District Judge. Plaintiff Arthur K. Goldstein brought this action under Section 502(e)(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(1), for damages and declaratory and injunctive relief in connection with the defendants’ denial of plaintiffs request for particular health benefits. The following parties are joined as defendants: Fairchild Indu
Jerald W. Freeman, the Tea Leaf Inc. v. Fairchildpublic domain
MAES, Justice. {1} Paul W. Fairchild Jr. asked the district court to grant summary judgment on his cross-claims against Defendants Richard H. Love and R.H. Love Galleries, Inc. (collectively Love) on the ground that Love failed to timely file a response to Fairchild's motion for summary judgment and was therefore "in default." Love, whose counsel had withdrawn while the motion was pendi
Fairchild Aircraft Corp. v. United Statespublic domain
Memorandum Opinion and Order *164(Dated April 15, 1983) Steptoe & Johnson (Richard O. Cunningham, W. George Grandison and Nina H. Questal on the brief) for the plaintiff. J. Paul McGath, Assistant Attorney General; Joseph I. Liebman, Att
Jane Doe I v. Juana Marine-Lombardpublic domain
LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK , Circuit Judge : In 2016, Louisiana amended two statutes to require that entertainers on premises licensed to serve alcohol and whose breasts or buttocks are exposed to view be 21 years of age or older. Three erotic dancers aged 18, 19, and 20 filed a complaint against the state official responsible for the Act's enforceme
Jane Doe I v. Juana Marine-Lombardpublic domain
LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: No member of the panel nor judge in regular active service requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc. The petition for rehearing en banc is therefore DENIED. See FED . R. APP . P. and 5th Cir. R. 35. Treating the petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition is GRANTED. We withdraw ou
Greg Herrick v. Jane Garvey, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, the Fairchild Corporation, Amicus Curiaepublic domain
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. This suit under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) requires us to determine the proper application of the “trade secret” exemption to FOIA’s general requirement that the federal government release information to the public. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. I Greg Herrick, t
Doe v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Indianapolispublic domain
958 N.E.2d 472 (2011) Jane DOE, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF INDIANAPOLIS, Appellee-Defendant. No. 49A02-1107-CT-595. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 17, 2011. *474 Raymond F. Fairchild, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. John S. (Jay) Mercer, Mercer Belanger, Indianapolis, IN, Attorne
Inez Manigault v. Jane Thorn-Hendersonpublic domain
CASE NO: 12-14-00156-CV FILED \H COURT OF APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TWELFTH DISTRICT Oi TYLER, TEXAS CATHY £ INEZ MANIGAULT Appellant v-
Romjue v. Fairchildpublic domain
60 Wn. App. 278 (1991) 803 P.2d 57 RUSSELL ROMJUE, Appellant, v. MITCH FAIRCHILD, ET AL, Respondents. No. 10474-5-III. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three. January 15, 1991. *279 Allen D. Brecke, Douglass A. North, and Maltman, Weber, Reed, North & Ahrens, for appellant.
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Jane M. Hough appeals from the district court’s grant of defendants’ motions for summary judgment and denial of both plaintiffs’ motion to vacate. 1 This cause of action involved claims of a breach of the duty of fair representation under § 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act o
GEORGE CLIFTON EDWARDS, Jr., Circuit Judge. Defendants in this case appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in a civil rights action alleging racial discrimination in the sale of real estate. This case involves a jury award totalling $42,200 in compensatory and punitive damages against a real estate firm, two of its sales agents and the sellers. The appellees in the case a
Judson Motors Ltd D/B/A Universal Toyota v. Jane Doepublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ———————————— No. 08-24-00054-CV ———————————— Judson Motors Ltd. d/b/a Universal Toyota, Appellant v. Ja
Goldstein v. GROUP INS. PLAN FOR FAIRCHILD REPUBLICpublic domain
940 F.Supp. 474 (1995) Arthur K. GOLDSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. GROUP INSURANCE PLAN FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES OF FAIRCHILD REPUBLIC COMPANY, FARMINGDALE FACILITY; Fairchild Industries Pension & Retirement Committee, as Plan Fiduciary and as Plan Administrator; John Doe and Jane Doe, as members of the Fairchild Industries Pension & Retirement Committee; and Fairchild Industries, Inc., Defendants. No. CV-9
Micahn T. Carter v. Mary E. Jonespublic domain
FILED DECEMBER 30, 2025 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE MICAHN T. CARTER, ) No. 40285-1-III
Nickolaj Latuszkin v. City of Chicagopublic domain
FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judge. Nickolaj Latuszkin sued the City of Chicago and Chicago police officer George Wilson after Wilson, while driving under the influence of alcohol, struck and killed Mr. Latuszkin’s wife, Sofia Latuszkin. At issue here is Mr. Latuszkin’s claim against the City under 42 U.S.C. see.1983, which the district court dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to s