Cases

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: The primary issue in this police-shooting case is whether the district court erred by giving the jury an excessive force instruction rather than a deadly force instruction pursuant to Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1, 105 S.Ct. 1694, 85 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985). Justin Monroe brought suit against Sgt. Donald Sherrard, an officer with the Phoenix

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO JANE HM DOE, A MARRIED WOMAN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF PHOENIX, A CORPORATION SOLE; THE SOCIETY OF THE DIVINE SAVIOR USA PROVINCE AKA SOCIETY OF THE DIVINE SAVIOR, A WISCONSIN CORPORATION; ST. MARK ROMAN CATHOLIC PARISH PHOENIX,

MEMORANDUM * Sharon Patches (“Patches”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment (1) in favor of the City of Phoenix (“City”) on her Title VII sex discrimination claim, and (2) in favor of the City and individual Appellees on her 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 actions and various constitutional claims. We review de novo a district court’s grant of summary judgment. Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO JANE DOE I, JANE DOE II, AND JOHN DOE, BY AND THROUGH CONSERVATOR, FLEMING AND CURTI, PLC, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. LENZNER MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC, AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND DR. JOHN HERROD AND SHERRIE FARNSWORT

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that compensatory damages are not available under Title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) without a showing of discriminatory intent. Maj. op. at 674-675.1 It has been established that compensatory damages are available for intentional violations of Title VI.

157 F.3d 668 8 A.D. Cases 862, 13 NDLR P 121, 98Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6943,98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7687,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,833,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9599 William D. FERGUSON; Elizabeth T. Ferguson; Bonnie P.Tucker; Jay T. Frankel; Barbara Jean Coffman,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipality; Lyle Rodabough; Jane DoeRodabough, Defendants-Appellees.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KRISH SINGH, No. 23-15356 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv- 00099-JJT v. CITY OF PHOENIX; BRITTANY OPINION SMITH-PETERSEN, Officer, Badge No. 10529, wife; SMITH-PETERSEN, First Name Unknown, husband; ANNIE BATWAY, Officer, Badge No. 9656, wife; BATWAY, First Name Unknown, husband; UNKNOWN PARTIES, named a

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO JANE DOE I, JANE DOE II, AND JOHN DOE, BY AND THROUGH CONSERVATOR, FLEMING AND CURTI PLC, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. SHAUNICE WARR, Defendant/Appellee. No. 2 CA-CV 2023-0272

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA DIANNAH DINSMOOR, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; DEER VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 97 OF MARICOPA COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA; LYNN MILLER AND JANE DOE MILLER, HUSBAND AND WIFE; KIMBERLY HEINZ AND JOHN DOE HEINZ, HUSBAND AND WIFE; KENNETH PALMER AND JANE DO

OPINION CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge: The influx of detainees in the Tucson Sector of the U.S. Border Patrol in 2015 resulted in Defendants (federal government officials and agents) holding detainees being processed for longer periods of time in overcrowded and unsanitary cells at eight different stations. Plaintiffs brought t

169 Ariz. 63 (1990) 817 P.2d 8 Max Anderson DUNLAP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX; Lawrence Wetzel and Jane Doe Wetzel, his wife; Charles Strong and Jane Doe Strong, his wife; Jon Sellers and Jane Doe Sellers, his wife; Edward Anthony and Jane Doe Anthony, his wife; Marcus Aurelius and Jane Doe Aurelius, his wife; Jack Bentley and Jane Doe Bentley, his wife; Michael Butler and Jane Doe Butler, his wife; Edward Fl

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA BRUSH & NIB STUDIO, LC, ET AL., Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, V. CITY OF PHOENIX, Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. CV-18-0176-PR Filed September 16, 2019 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA BRUSH & NIB STUDIO, LC, ET AL., Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, V. CITY OF PHOENIX, Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. CV-18-0176-PR Filed September 16, 2019 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

152 Ariz. 164 (1986) 730 P.2d 873 Diane MORN, individually and as guardian ad litem for Rebecca Morn, Daniel Morn, Theresa Morn and Kristyn Morn, minors; Georgia Joyce Collins, individually and as guardian ad litem for Jolonda Joyce Collins, Gordon Fletcher and Ronoska Fletcher, minors, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, a body politic of the State of Arizona; Rocky Franklin and Jane Doe Franklin, his wife; David B

615 F.Supp.2d 1002 (2009) Jane DOE, in her own capacity and as the natural mother and legal guardian of her minor child, John Doe; John Doe, Plaintiffs, v. Bill Franklin DICKENSON; City of Phoenix, Defendants. No. CV-07-01998-PHX-GMS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. April 30, 2009. *1004 Stephen G. Montoya, Augustine B.

FELDMAN, Justice. Petitioner (the City) brings this special action proceeding alleging that the respondent trial judge acted in excess of his authority and jurisdiction or abused his discretion in a condemnation action by denying the City’s application for immediate possession of land owned or possessed by the real parties in interest (property owners). Finding that the petition presented important questions of general publi

117 Ariz. 272 (1977) 572 P.2d 100 Ernest W. McGEORGE and Ruth K. McGeorge, surviving parents of Ronald Craig McGeorge, Deceased, Appellants, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, Arizona, a Municipal Corporation, Lawrence M. Wetzel, Chief of Police, City of Phoenix, Arizona, John B. Wentz, City Manager, City of Phoenix, Arizona, Michael D. Chambers, Police Officer employed by the City of Phoenix, Arizona, and Jane Doe Chambers, his wife, Ap

163 Ariz. 388 (1989) 788 P.2d 121 TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company of the Hartford Insurance Group, Plaintiffs/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. Jane DOE; X, Y, and Z, the minor children of Jane Doe, Defendants/Appellants/Cross-Appellees. 2 CA-CV 89-0014. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A. Dece

102 Ariz. 195 (1967) 427 P.2d 335 Russell W. VEACH and Thelma L. Veach, husband and wife, d.b.a. Ozark Market, Appellants, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation, G.H. Towne and Jane Doe Towne, husband and wife, G.H. Towne, d.b.a. Towne Electric Company, John Doe and Jane Doe, and Arizona Public Service Company, an Arizona corporation, Appellees. No. 7965. Supreme Court of

902 F.Supp. 1459 (1995) NATIONAL PETROLEUM MARKETING, INC., a Nevada Corporation; d/b/a Arizona Fuel Terminal; Sunshine Western, Inc., a Nevada Corporation; John Knight II, and Miller Distributing, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. PHOENIX FUEL CO., INC., an Arizona Corporation; d/b/a Firebird Fuel Co. and Mesa Fuel Co. and Tucson Fuel Co.; Jack Keller and Jane Doe Keller, Husband and Wife, William Wilhoit and Jane Doe Wilhoit, Husband a