Cases

Judge OHLSON delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 We granted review in this case to determine whether assault consummated by a battery, Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 928 (2012), is a lesser included offense of sexual assault and abusive sexual contact, Article 120, U

OPINION OF THE COURT JOHNSON, Senior Judge: A panel of officer and enlisted members, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted appellant, pursuant to mixed pleas, of resisting apprehension, four specifications of assault in varying degrees, 1 and one specification of breaking restriction, in vi

149 F.2d 760 (1945) UNITED STATES v. GIROUARD. No. 4058. Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit. June 1, 1945. *761 Arthur J. B. Cartier, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Edmund J. Brandon, U. S. Atty., all of Boston, Mass., for appellant. William J. Fitzsimons and David J. Coddaire, both of Boston, Mass., for appellee. Befo

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellant v. Paul E. COOPER, Yeoman Second Class United States Navy, Appellee No. 18-0282 Crim. App. No. 201500039 Argued December 4, 2018—Decided Febr

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellant v. Paul E. COOPER, Yeoman Second Class United States Navy, Appellee No. 18-0282 Crim. App. No. 201500039 A

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.R. MCFARLANE, K.M. MCDONALD, M.K. JAMISON Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRIAN T. HART MASTER-AT-ARMS SEAMAN (E-3), U.S. NAVY NMCCA 201300295

DELEHANT, District Judge. Jacob A. Wiebe (herein called the applicant), born October 27, 1918, of German ancestry in Russia, a Russian national residing in the United States since October 3, 1923, and now the husband of a citizen by birth of the United States, has applied for naturalization under Section 311 of the Nationality Act of 1940, Title 8 U.S.C.A. § 711. The United States has filed a motion to di

Smith, J. (concurring). We continue to pursue our melancholy way in these compensation cases, the Court dividing and re-dividing with monotonous regularity. as the egregious errors of the past continue to war with the humanitarian objectives of the act we must construe. Our “eminence” in these cases, as Dean Pound so cogently observed (see. Mr. Justice Black in Mack v. Reo Motors, Inc., 345 Mich 268, 281), is