Cases

OPINION AND ORDER AIKEN, Chief Judge: Plaintiffs filed suit against the City of Eugene (the City) and three law enforcement officers alleging excessive force claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and negligence and battery claims under state law. Plaintiffs’ claims arise from the forcible and unannounced entry of their home during the execution of a search warrant. Plaintiffs seek economic, non-economic, and puniti

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ORLANDO HARRIS AND BLONDSHA HARRIS, Appellants, v. Case No. 5D22-130 LT Case No. 2020-CA-051224 BOB STEELE

Callahan, J., dissents and votes to affirm in the following memorandum: I do not concur. The record' clearly demonstrates that respondents have failed for a period of more than one year following the date the child was placed in foster care substantially and continuously or repeatedly to plan for the future of the child, although physically and financially able to do so, notwithstanding petitioner’s diligent efforts to encourage

418 S.E.2d 724 (1992) Richard John DZIARNOWSKI v. Jamie DZIARNOWSKI. Record No. 0018-91-4. Court of Appeals of Virginia. June 23, 1992. Robert J. Surovell, Fairfax (Anne Steele; Surovell, Jackson, Colten & Dugan, on briefs), for appellant. Steve N. Luxford, Vienna, for appellee. Present: BAKER, DUFF and ELDER, JJ.

OPINION BUMB, District Judge. Pro se plaintiff Miguel Duran brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He asserts various constitutional torts related to his pre-trial detention at the Atlantic County Justice Facility. Currently before the Court are three summary judgment motions brought by defendant CFG Health Systems LLC (“CFG”) [Dkt. Ent. 266]; individual defendants Warden Gary

Sanderson-Burgess v City of New York (2019 NY Slip Op 05173) Sanderson-Burgess v City of New York 2019 NY Slip Op 05173 Decided on June 26, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Repo

OPINION CRONE, Judge. Case Summary Platinum Construction Group, LLC (“Platinum”) appeals an order of the Worker’s Compensation Board (“the Board”) awarding benefits to former Platinum construction supervisor Christopher Codings for injuries he suffered to his back, neck, and hip during a 2009 accident on the job. Platinum con

TOOKEY, J., dissenting. The majority holds that the officer safety exception articulated by the Supreme Court in State v. Bates, 304 Or 519, 747 P2d 991 (1987), does not apply in this case, in which a lone police officer, in a remote forested area, confronted a group of five individuals with firearms to cite them for violations involving the use of their firearms. I do not agree that the trial court err

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Monifa J. STERLING, Lance Corporal United States Marine Corps, Appellant/Cross-Appellee No. 15-0510 & No. 16-0223 Crim. App. No. 201400150 Argued April 27, 2016—Decided August 10, 2016

MEMORANDUM A. Richard Caputo, United States District Judge Presently before me is a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 47) filed by Defendants Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Railway, and Jeffrey D. Boyd (collectively “Defendants”). *559This case concerns a fatal accident involving a train owned by Defendant Norfolk Southern Railw

In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 24–1753 Submitted January 21, 2026—Filed May 15, 2026 Leonora Streeter, Rodney DeHaan, Esther DeHaan, Kurt Menefee, Robert Lampe, Douglas Benjamin, Barbara Benjamin, Teresa Garvey, Charlotte Thoma, Jeffrey Burke, Jan Burke, Jane Flammang, Aaron Flammang, Susan Sundlin, Steve Brennan, Kevin Brennan, Brian Brennan, Alison Brennan, Sally Brennan, Robert Marksbury, Lynn Marksbury, Lynn Stick,

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS STEARNS, District Judge. The plaintiff was victimized by Jamie Melendez. When plaintiff was fourteen years of age and Melendez nineteen, the two engaged in sexual relations to which the underage plaintiff could not validly consent. Plaintiff became pregnant by Melendez and gave birth to his biological child. In September of 2011, Melendez pled guilty to f

WALLACE, Judge. A jury found Matthew Lee Rangel guilty of possession of cocaine, a violation of section 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2010), and sale of cocaine within a thousand feet of a place of worship, a violation of section 893.13(l)(e)(l). On appeal, Mr. Rangel challenges his judgment and sentences on two grounds. We agree with Mr. Rangel that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to es

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. William DeSimone v. Springpoint Senior Living, Inc. (A-37-22) (087891) Argued September 26, 2023 -- Decided January 10, 2023 FASCIALE, J., writing for a unanimous Court. The Court considers whether t

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. William DeSimone v. Springpoint Senior Living, Inc. (A-37-22) (087891) Argued September 26, 2023 -- Decided January 10, 2024 FASCIALE, J., writing for a unanimous Court. The Court considers whether

B. Lynn Winmill, Chief Judge INTRODUCTION Pending before the court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 44) filed by Defendant Idaho Falls School District (the "District"). Plaintiff R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor (the "Secretary"), opposes the Motion. The Court heard oral argument on August 10, 2017 and ordered supplemental briefing, which was completed on August 16, 2017. For the reason

FIELD, Senior Circuit Judge. Jesse A. X. Cooper, on behalf of himself and ten other prisoners, instituted this action against the Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiffs alleged that their procedural due process rights had been violated by the Institutional Classification Commit

FILED Jun 26 2024, 9:10 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

OPINION MATHIAS, Judge. Jeffrey M. Miller and Cynthia S. Miller (“the Millers”) appeal the Marion Superior Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”) and 500 Festival, Inc. (“500 Festival”) on the Millers’ claim of defama *1009 ti

DATE: 11/13/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:29:24 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302018 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________