Cases

RAYMOND P. MOORE, United States District Judge At issue is whether Defendants Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC ("Ocwen") and HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as Trustee on behalf of Ace Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust and for the Registered Holders of Ace Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 20070HE2, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, ("HSBC") (Ocwen and HSBC, collectively, "Defendants") wrongly assessed charges and fees, and

SLEET, Judge. Ruby L. Brooker appeals the final judgment of foreclosure entered against her and in favor of Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC. We reverse because Ocwen failed to prove that it complied with paragraph twenty-two of the mortgage and the note’s contractual requirement to mail a notice of default to Brooker as a condition precedent to foreclosure. The breach letter was not admitted into evidence, and without record proof

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Harry D. Leinenweber, Judge Before the Court is Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). [ECF No. 27]. For the reasons stated herein, the Motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND The following facts are contained in the Plaintiffs’ Complaints and attached exhibits. They

*1372ORDER BETH BLOOM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon: Defendant Experian and Defendant Trans Union LLC’s Motions to Dismiss, ECF Nos. [68], [69], filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) on May 26, 2015; Defendant Equifax’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, ECF No. [78], filed under Fed, R. Civ. P. 12(c) on Ma

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Harry D. Leinenweber, United States District Judge On the day before his monthly deadline closed, Plaintiff Howard Kier (“Kier”) was charged a $10 fee to make an online mortgage loan payment. Kier alleges that in assessing the'fee, Defendants Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (“Ocwen”), Mortgage Electronic Registration -Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), and Federal National Mortgage

Thomas P. Agresti, Judge This matter concerns an Order to Show Cause ("OTSC") that was issued in both of the above cases against Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC ("Ocwen") and three individuals regarding a failure to comply with a number of Court orders requiring the production of complete mortgage loan histories in several bankruptcy cases. For reasons that will be discussed in detail below, the Court finds that Ocwen materially disobey

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION PER CURIAM. We grant Appellant’s Motion for Clarification, withdraw our previous opinion filed on September 16, 2014, and substitute the following opinion in its place. *53 Appellant, Mark Pennington (“Pennington”), appeals the

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rhonda Brown appeals the district court’s orders denying relief in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

433 B.R. 585 (2010) In re James T. THRASH and Kimberly K. Thrash, Debtors. James T. Thrash and Kimberly K. Thrash, Plaintiffs, v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 99-46344-DML-13. Adversary No. 09-04142. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. July 28, 2010. *588 Chase P. Laws, CPL

KLINGÉNSMITfel, J. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (“appellant”) appeals the trial court’s final judgment in favor of Jean Marie Delvar a/k/a Jean Delvar, et al. (“appellee”), in which the trial court found that there had been an enforceable, oral modification of the mortgage. , Appellant argues that the trial court erred by ruling that the mortgage had been orally modified and by rewri

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

2020 IL App (2d) 190774 No. 2-19-0774 Opinion filed December 30, 2020 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS SECOND DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________________ OCWEN LOAN SERVICING,

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 17, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D22-1872 Lower Tribunal No. 14-31602 ________________ Daniel A. Fernandez, et al., Appellants,

MEMORANDUM PADOVA, District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ...134 II. BACKGROUND ...134 III. THE CLASS CERTIFICATION RECORD .. .135 A. Background Regarding Ocwen’s In-House Balloon Loan Modifications and its Documentation Systems ... 135 B. The Class Representatives ... 136 1. Plaintiffs Li

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT RUBY L. BROOKER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I OF PLAINTIFFS’COMPLAINT JAMES I. COHN, United States District Judge THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiffs’ Complaint [DE 17] (“Motion”). The Court, has reviewed the Motion, Plaintiffs’ Response [DE 21], Defendant’s Reply [DE 32], and the record in this case, and

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Jeffrey Phillips’s (“Plaintiff” or “Phillips”) Objections [139] to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand’s Final Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) [135]. The R & R recommends granting Defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC’s (“Defendant” or “OLS”) Motion for Summary Judgment [104]. Also b

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing (“defendant” or “Ocwen”) moves to dismiss, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), plaintiff Rufus Kilgore’s (“plaintiff’) claims alleging violations of federal and New York state law in connection with his application for a home mortgage modification. ' Originally, plaintiff had commenced this action as one of th

*215 OPINION AND ORDER ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge: Plaintiffs bring this purported class action suit against loan servicers and insurers. Plaintiffs are borrowers who were required to pay their loan servicers for lender-placed insurance in connection with their residential mortgage loans.1