⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “James William Johnson”

Texas Supreme Court · 2015-03-26 · Published · cited 0×
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TENTH COURT OF APPEALS Chief Justice Tom Gray Justice Rex D. Davis Al Scoggins McLennan County Courthouse 501 Washington Avenue, Rm 415 Waco, Texas 76701-1373 Phone: (254) 757-5200 Fax: (254) 757-2822 Clerk Sharri Roessler
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) · 2015-03-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14-00135-CR WILLIAM JAMES JOHNSON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 13-03259-CRF-85
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-06-30 · Published · cited 0×
06/30/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs March 3, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. WILLIAM JOHNSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 18-04642 John W. Campbell, Judge No. W2019-00914-CCA-R3-CD The defendant
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2022-05-12 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-EC-00982-SCT DR. OLIVER JOHNSON AND CHAUNCY WRIGHT v. WILLIAM BROCK AND JAMES WILSON, SR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/15/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JEFF WEILL, SR. TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: WALTER HOWARD ZINN, JR. ANDREW N. ALEXANDER, III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WASHIN
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017-08-30 · Published · cited 76× · 528 S.W.3d 487
OPINION Holly Kirby, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Jeffrey S. Bivins, C.J., and Cornelia A. Clark, Sharon G. Lee, and Roger A. Page, JJ., joined. We granted permission for this appeal to determine whether a surviving spouse who files a wrongful death lawsuit is acting as a legal repr
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015-06-30 · Published · cited 15× · 791 F.3d 567; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11269; 2015 WL 3965828
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: James Lee Henderson appeals the district court’s denial of federal habeas relief on his claim that he is ineligible to be executed because he is intellectually disabled. We AFFIRM. I. Although this is not Henderson’s first appeal to this Court, we set out the facts and lengthy procedural history bef
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015-03-10 · Published · cited 2× · 779 F.3d 867; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 3687; 2015 WL 1020808
COLLOTON, Circuit Judgé. James Edward Smith, an inmate of the Arkansas Department of Correction, filed suit against Sammy D. Johnson, a corree- *869 tional officer, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging a violation of Smith’s Eighth Amendment rights. Smith asserts that Johnson and another officer acted w
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2018-06-28 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-18-00011-CV VICKI PRUITT JOHNSON APPELLANT V. JOHN GILMER JOHNSON, JOEL APPELLEES DAVID JOHNSON, JUDY FOWLER, ROSS GRIFFITH, CARY SCHROEDER, JAMES HOLLIDAY, DYANN MCCULLY, JOHN DOWDY, AND WILLIAM
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2014-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 21, 2014 WILLIAM T. JOHNSON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 284499 Don W. Poole, Judge No. E2014-00828-CCA-R3-PC - Filed December 8, 2014 J AMES C URWOOD W ITT, J R., J., concurring. I fully concur in the majority opinion
Johnson v. Wallichpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014-09-30 · Published · cited 6× · 578 F. App'x 601
ORDER Wisconsin inmate James Johnson appeals the dismissal of his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging due process vio*602lations in connection with the destruction of his vehicle, which had been stolen but then recovered and taken into possession by the Milwaukee Police Department. The district court concluded that Johnson’s complaint did not state a due process claim bec
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016-09-14 · Published · cited 1× · 502 S.W.3d 168; 2016 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1043; 2016 WL 4793139
Keller, P.J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which Meyers, Keasler, Hervey, Alcala, Richardson, Yeary and Newell, JJ, joined. Pursuant to an agreement, appellant pled guilty to two felony offenses. In addition to the written terms of the plea agreement, the parties orally agreed to a statement made by defense counsel. Th
State v. Johnsonpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017-09-27 · Published · cited 1× · 244 So. 3d 617
STONE, J. The defendant, Gregory Lynn Johnson, was convicted by a unanimous jury of second degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of probation, parole, or suspension of sentence. Johnson now appeals. For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On June 27, 2013, officers with the Shreveport Police Department ("SPD") r
State v. Johnsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2016-09-14 · Published · cited 0× · 792 S.E.2d 803; 2016 N.C. LEXIS 799; 2016 WL 4937878
The following order has been entered on the Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief filed on the 14th of September 2016 by State of NC:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th of September 2016."State of NC shall have up to and including the 28th day of September 20 16 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2008-02-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 11, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES DAVID JOHNSON Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Tipton County Nos. 5132, 5221 Joseph H. Walker, III, Judge No. W2006-01842-CCA-R3-CD - Filed February 6, 2008 The defendant, James David Johnson, was convicted of premedit
State v. Johnsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2016-04-22 · Published · cited 0× · 784 S.E.2d 483; 2016 WL 1618240; 2016 N.C. LEXIS 372
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd of April 2016 by State of NC for Temporary Stay:"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 22nd of April 2016."
Bland v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016-03-01 · Published · cited 2× · 637 F. App'x 2
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal from the order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia was presented to the court and briefed and argued by counsel. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has- determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(d). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the dis
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 558 S.W.3d 77
KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge Introduction Johnson & Johnson ("J&J") and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. ("JJCI")1 (collectively, "Defendants") appeal the trial court's judgment after a jury verdict in favor of Gloria Ristesund ("Ristesund") on her product-liability claims. Ristesund concedes that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over Defendants, and requests th
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2010-02-17 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § JAMES RANDALL MOORE A/K/A RANDY MOORE, § No. 08-08-00039-CV Appellant, § Appeal from v. § 416th Dis
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2010-02-17 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS JAMES RANDALL MOORE A/K/A RANDY MOORE, Appellant, v. CITY OF WYLIE, TEXAS AND WILLIAM JOHNSON, Appellees. <
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016-07-19 · Published · cited 1× · 195 Wash. App. 144; 380 P.3d 591
Bjorgen, C.J. ¶1 Corinn and Ian James appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their lawsuit against Casey McMurry and his wife (McMurry) on grounds that they failed to comply with the requirements of RCW 46.64.040, the statute allowing for service on a motorist defendant via the secretary of state. They argue that the trial court erred by ruling that RCW 46.64.040 required them to fil