⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “James Thomas Dunlap”

Dunlap v. AIG, Inc.public domain
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2019-01-09 · Published · cited 0× · 927 N.W.2d 201
DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART. REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2019-01-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17-1503 Filed January 9, 2019 THOMAS JAMES DUNLAP, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. AIG, INC., COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY INSURANCE COMPANY and AIG DOMESTIC CLAIMS, INC. CORPORATIONS, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie K. Vaudt, Judge. Thomas Dunlap
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018-08-20 · Published · cited 13× · 194 A.3d 1067
OPINION BY BOWES, J.: Appellants Roger Maher and Carl Roell ("Maher and Roell") appeal from the order granting summary judgment in favor of Federal Signal Corporation ("Federal Signal"), *1068 and dismissing all remaining claims. We affirm. Maher and Roell are
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000-03-31 · Published · cited 25× · 209 F.3d 472; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 5817; 2000 WL 342234
OPINION KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge. The defendants-appellants James E. Dunlap, also known as “Fatty” (“Dunlap”), and Jakhan Thomas, also known as “Ja-Con” (“Thomas”), have each contested his respective sentence imposed following his conviction entered upon his guilty plea to conspiring to possess and distribute cocaine base (or “crack”). Both defendants ha
State v. Dunlappublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006-03-24 · Published · cited 45× · 271 Neb. 314; 710 N.W.2d 873; 2006 Neb. LEXIS 45
271 Neb. 314 STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLANT, v. JAMES A. DUNLAP, APPELLEE. No. S-05-578. Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed March 24, 2006. Stuart J. Dornan, Douglas County Attorney, Jennifer Meckna, and Kevin J. Edwards, Senior Certified Law Student, for appellant. Thomas C. Riley, Douglas County Public Defender, and Stephen R. Kraft for appellee. HENDRY,
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2005-09-30 · Published · cited 8× · 331 B.R. 674; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23432; 2005 WL 2561470
331 B.R. 674 (2005) James DUNLAP, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. FRIEDMAN'S, INC., d/b/a Friedman's Jewelers, a Delaware corporation, and American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, Inc., and American Bankers Life Assurance Company of Florida and Alan Hopkins and William Perry and Nancy Tanoukhi and Roy Batson and John Doe and Jane Doe, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 2:05-0136.
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2003-07-07 · Published · cited 38× · 582 S.E.2d 841; 213 W. Va. 394
ALBRIGHT, Justice. This is an appeal by Stephanie Gibson and James Dunlap1 (hereinafter “Appellants”) from a final order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County dismissing Consumer Credit and Protection Act (hereinafter “CCPA”) claims for failure to file a complaint within the applicable statute of limitations period. On appeal, the Appellants assert that the lower court erred in finding that the
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014-04-11 · Published · cited 778× · 749 F.3d 217; 2014 WL 1395666; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6668
OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. Lawrence Thomas brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the New Jersey Civil Rights Act, N.J. Stat. Ann. § 10:6-2, after he sustained an attack at the hands of other inmates at the Cumberland County Correctional Facility (the “CCCF”). The attack occurred after a several-minute long verbal argument between
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1993-09-17 · Published · cited 15× · 158 B.R. 724; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13293; 1993 WL 370546
158 B.R. 724 (1993) In re Alice L. DUNLAP, James and Catherine Mitchell, Debtors. Alice L. DUNLAP, James and Catherine Mitchell, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. CASH AMERICA PAWN OF NASHVILLE, Defendant/Appellant. No. 3:92-0954. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. September 17, 1993. *725 William Randal
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1992-08-20 · Published · cited 5× · 143 B.R. 859; 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 2328; 1992 WL 201298
143 B.R. 859 (1992) In re Alice L. DUNLAP, James and Catherine Mitchell, Debtors. Alice L. DUNLAP, James and Catherine Mitchell, Plaintiffs, v. CASH AMERICA PAWN OF NASHVILLE, Defendant. Bankruptcy Nos. 391-09805, 391-10113, ADV. No. 391-0564A. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee. August 20, 1992. *860 Thomas C. Na
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2002-06-13 · Published · cited 100× · 567 S.E.2d 265; 211 W. Va. 549; 2002 W. Va. LEXIS 80
567 S.E.2d 265 (2002) 211 W.Va. 549 STATE of West Virginia ex rel. James DUNLAP, Petitioner, v. Honorable Irene C. BERGER, Judge of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, and Friedman's, Inc., dba Friedman's Jewelers, et al., Respondents. No. 30035. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted January 8, 2002. Decided June 13, 2002
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016-07-28 · Published · cited 2× · 199 So. 3d 639; 2016 La.App. 1 Cir. 0170; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 1438; 2016 WL 4062871
McCLENDON, J. Appellants seek review of a judgment that taxed them with all court costs following a trial on the merits. Appellants also seek review of the reasonableness of the amounts taxed. For the following reasons, we amend the judgment and affirm the judgment as amended. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY A bench trial in the underlying matter was held on July 8-11, 2014. Thereafter, t
California Court of Appeal · 2008-01-15 · Published · cited 41× · 158 Cal. App. 4th 1261; 20 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 665; 70 Cal. Rptr. 3d 715; 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 53
Opinion FYBEL, J. I. Introduction Christine C.1 appeals from the judgment entered on James C.’s petition for dissolution of marriage. Christine suffers from bipolar disorder and breast cancer. She was representing herself in propria persona and was hospitalized when the trial court denied her request under the Americans with Disabilit
U.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994-03-17 · Published · cited 0× · 39 M.J. 835; 1994 CMR LEXIS 95; 1994 WL 84182
OPINION OF THE COURT LANE, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of one specification of sodomy with his then three-year-old daughter, in violation of Article 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 925 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ], The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a dishonorable discharge,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002-05-09 · Published · cited 172× · 290 F.3d 191; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 8909; 2002 WL 939551
NIEMEJER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: On James Dunlap’s motion to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (conferring diversity jurisdiction), the district court found and concluded that “it lack[ed] subject matter jurisdiction because the amount in controversy regarding Dunlap’s individual claim has not been shown to exceed the jurisdictional threshold [of $75,000].” Ac
Baber v. Dunlappublic domain
District Court, D. Maine · 2018-12-13 · Published · cited 3× · 376 F. Supp. 3d 125
Lance E. Walker, U.S. District Judge Although the Court scheduled the hearing on December 5, 2018 to address Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the parties agreed that the question of injunctive relief should be consolidated with a final ruling on the merits of the action. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 65(a)(2), this Decision and Order will be accompanied by a final judgment in favor of Defendants.
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2006-07-06 · Published · cited 6× · 632 S.E.2d 118; 280 Ga. 698; 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 2178; 2006 Ga. LEXIS 466
632 S.E.2d 118 (2006) 280 Ga. 698 THOMAS et al. v. GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOCIATES OF GAINESVILLE, P.C. et al. No. S05G1725. Supreme Court of Georgia. July 6, 2006. Charles Madden Cork III, Gambrell & Stolz, LLC, Macon, Steven L. Beard, Marietta, for Appellants. James Ernest Brim III, Forrester & Brim, Thomas M. Cole, Whelchel &
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001-01-17 · Published · cited 15× · 237 F.3d 716; 43 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 784; 45 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 771; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 574; 37 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 59; 2001 WL 42195
OPINION RUSSELL, District Judge. In this check-kiting case that originated in the Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Tennessee, we are faced with a collision between Article 4 of the UCC (and federal banking regulations) and the Bankruptcy Code. Appellant, First Tennessee Bank, N.A., appeals from the District Court’s order affirming the Bankruptcy
Nevada Supreme Court · 2018-02-26 · Published · cited 0× · 413 P.3d 835
REVERSE. REMAND.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991-07-15 · Published · cited 42× · 935 F.2d 1440
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge: Appellants Lonnie Schmidt (Schmidt), Thomas Dunlap, Sr. (Dunlap), and James Lewis (Lewis) were convicted in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina on sixteen conspiracy and substantive counts of various federal tax violations stemming from a scheme to sell trusts known as Unincorporated Business Organizations (UBOs). Participants in the UBOs could assign income