Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “James Thomas Dunlap”
Dunlap v. AIG, Inc.public domain
DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION See Iowa R. App. P. 6.904AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART. REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
Thomas James Dunlap v. AIG, Inc., Commerce and Industry Insurance Company and AIG Domestic Claims, Inc. Corporationspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17-1503 Filed January 9, 2019 THOMAS JAMES DUNLAP, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. AIG, INC., COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY INSURANCE COMPANY and AIG DOMESTIC CLAIMS, INC. CORPORATIONS, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie K. Vaudt, Judge. Thomas Dunlap
Dunlap, R. v. Federal Signal Corp.public domain
OPINION BY BOWES, J.: Appellants Roger Maher and Carl Roell ("Maher and Roell") appeal from the order granting summary judgment in favor of Federal Signal Corporation ("Federal Signal"), *1068 and dismissing all remaining claims. We affirm. Maher and Roell are
OPINION KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge. The defendants-appellants James E. Dunlap, also known as “Fatty” (“Dunlap”), and Jakhan Thomas, also known as “Ja-Con” (“Thomas”), have each contested his respective sentence imposed following his conviction entered upon his guilty plea to conspiring to possess and distribute cocaine base (or “crack”). Both defendants ha
State v. Dunlappublic domain
271 Neb. 314 STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLANT, v. JAMES A. DUNLAP, APPELLEE. No. S-05-578. Supreme Court of Nebraska. Filed March 24, 2006. Stuart J. Dornan, Douglas County Attorney, Jennifer Meckna, and Kevin J. Edwards, Senior Certified Law Student, for appellant. Thomas C. Riley, Douglas County Public Defender, and Stephen R. Kraft for appellee. HENDRY,
Dunlap v. Friedman's, Inc.public domain
331 B.R. 674 (2005) James DUNLAP, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. FRIEDMAN'S, INC., d/b/a Friedman's Jewelers, a Delaware corporation, and American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida, Inc., and American Bankers Life Assurance Company of Florida and Alan Hopkins and William Perry and Nancy Tanoukhi and Roy Batson and John Doe and Jane Doe, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 2:05-0136.
Dunlap v. Friedman's, Inc.public domain
ALBRIGHT, Justice. This is an appeal by Stephanie Gibson and James Dunlap1 (hereinafter “Appellants”) from a final order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County dismissing Consumer Credit and Protection Act (hereinafter “CCPA”) claims for failure to file a complaint within the applicable statute of limitations period. On appeal, the Appellants assert that the lower court erred in finding that the
Lawrence Thomas v. Cumberland Countypublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. Lawrence Thomas brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the New Jersey Civil Rights Act, N.J. Stat. Ann. § 10:6-2, after he sustained an attack at the hands of other inmates at the Cumberland County Correctional Facility (the “CCCF”). The attack occurred after a several-minute long verbal argument between
Dunlap v. Cash America Pawn (In Re Dunlap)public domain
158 B.R. 724 (1993) In re Alice L. DUNLAP, James and Catherine Mitchell, Debtors. Alice L. DUNLAP, James and Catherine Mitchell, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. CASH AMERICA PAWN OF NASHVILLE, Defendant/Appellant. No. 3:92-0954. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. September 17, 1993. *725 William Randal
143 B.R. 859 (1992) In re Alice L. DUNLAP, James and Catherine Mitchell, Debtors. Alice L. DUNLAP, James and Catherine Mitchell, Plaintiffs, v. CASH AMERICA PAWN OF NASHVILLE, Defendant. Bankruptcy Nos. 391-09805, 391-10113, ADV. No. 391-0564A. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee. August 20, 1992. *860 Thomas C. Na
State Ex Rel. Dunlap v. Bergerpublic domain
567 S.E.2d 265 (2002) 211 W.Va. 549 STATE of West Virginia ex rel. James DUNLAP, Petitioner, v. Honorable Irene C. BERGER, Judge of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, and Friedman's, Inc., dba Friedman's Jewelers, et al., Respondents. No. 30035. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted January 8, 2002. Decided June 13, 2002
McCLENDON, J. Appellants seek review of a judgment that taxed them with all court costs following a trial on the merits. Appellants also seek review of the reasonableness of the amounts taxed. For the following reasons, we amend the judgment and affirm the judgment as amended. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY A bench trial in the underlying matter was held on July 8-11, 2014. Thereafter, t
James C. v. Christine C.public domain
Opinion FYBEL, J. I. Introduction Christine C.1 appeals from the judgment entered on James C.’s petition for dissolution of marriage. Christine suffers from bipolar disorder and breast cancer. She was representing herself in propria persona and was hospitalized when the trial court denied her request under the Americans with Disabilit
United States v. Dunlappublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT LANE, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of one specification of sodomy with his then three-year-old daughter, in violation of Article 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 925 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ], The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a dishonorable discharge,
NIEMEJER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: On James Dunlap’s motion to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (conferring diversity jurisdiction), the district court found and concluded that “it lack[ed] subject matter jurisdiction because the amount in controversy regarding Dunlap’s individual claim has not been shown to exceed the jurisdictional threshold [of $75,000].” Ac
Baber v. Dunlappublic domain
Lance E. Walker, U.S. District Judge Although the Court scheduled the hearing on December 5, 2018 to address Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the parties agreed that the question of injunctive relief should be consolidated with a final ruling on the merits of the action. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 65(a)(2), this Decision and Order will be accompanied by a final judgment in favor of Defendants.
632 S.E.2d 118 (2006) 280 Ga. 698 THOMAS et al. v. GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOCIATES OF GAINESVILLE, P.C. et al. No. S05G1725. Supreme Court of Georgia. July 6, 2006. Charles Madden Cork III, Gambrell & Stolz, LLC, Macon, Steven L. Beard, Marietta, for Appellants. James Ernest Brim III, Forrester & Brim, Thomas M. Cole, Whelchel &
OPINION RUSSELL, District Judge. In this check-kiting case that originated in the Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Tennessee, we are faced with a collision between Article 4 of the UCC (and federal banking regulations) and the Bankruptcy Code. Appellant, First Tennessee Bank, N.A., appeals from the District Court’s order affirming the Bankruptcy
Thomas v. MEI-GSR Holdings, LLCpublic domain
REVERSE. REMAND.
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge: Appellants Lonnie Schmidt (Schmidt), Thomas Dunlap, Sr. (Dunlap), and James Lewis (Lewis) were convicted in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina on sixteen conspiracy and substantive counts of various federal tax violations stemming from a scheme to sell trusts known as Unincorporated Business Organizations (UBOs). Participants in the UBOs could assign income