Cases

599 S.E.2d 331 (2004) 267 Ga.App. 379 STANLEY v. The STATE. No. A04A0572. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 12, 2004. *332 James C. Bonner, Jr., Atlanta, Candace L. Byrd, for appellant. Joseph J. Drolet, Solicitor-General, Frank T. Gomez, Assistant Solicitor-General, for appellee. SMITH, Chief

PER CURIAM. The appellants, two homeowner members of the Mirror Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc., sued the Association, its Board of Directors (Board), and the individual directors for declaratory relief, claiming that the Board acted contrary to the Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions (Declaration) by amending it without first obtaining the affirmative vote of three-fourths of the members. The amendment eliminated the r

BARNES, J„ for the Court: ¶ 1. Valerie Bonner filed a negligence action against Imperial Palace of Mississippi LLC (IPM) regarding an injury she allegedly sustained in 2010 when she slipped and fell at the Back Bay Buffet at the Imperial Palace Casino, Resort, and Spa in Biloxi, Mississippi. The Harrison County Circuit Court granted IPM’s motion for summary judgment. Finding no error, we affirm. STATEMENT

646 S.E.2d 763 (2007) BONNER ROOFING & SHEET METAL COMPANY, INC. et al. v. KARSMAN et al. Karsman et al. v. Bonner Roofing & Sheet Metal Company, Inc. et al. Nos. A07A0597, A07A0598. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 29, 2007. *764 Jones, Jensen & Harris, Taylor W. Jones, Atlanta, for appellant. Swif

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 12, 2012 STANLEY BLUE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 04-02312 Chris Craft, Judge No. W2011-01936-CCA-R3-PC - Filed August 15, 2012 A Shelby County jury convicted the Petitioner, Stanley Blue, of facilitation of first degr

81 F.3d 472 Joyce BONNER, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.D.R. ANDERSON, Deputy, and in his individual capacity,Defendant-Appellant,andStan Beger, Captain, and in his individual capacity; FrankCecil, in his individual capacity, Defendants. No. 95-1705. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. Argued Oct. 30, 1995.Decided April 17, 1996.

592 S.E.2d 660 (2004) 277 Ga. 565 HEYWARD v. HUMPHREY. No. S04A0040. Supreme Court of Georgia. February 2, 2004. *661 Stanley L. Heyward, Pelham, pro se. Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Paula K. Smith, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Mark A. Gilbert, for appellee. James C. Bonner, Jr., Sarah L. Gerwi

PER CURIAM: After the death of her son, Plaintiff Deborah Carringer filed suit against defendants Police Chief Stanley Rodgers and the City of Barnesville under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Carringer also brought state law claims for the wrongful death of her son and for funeral expenses against Officer Ethel Tessmer, Chief Rodgers, and the City. The district court dismissed Car-ringer’s s

167 F.Supp.2d 1322 (2001) Ronald SHIELDS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FORT JAMES CORPORATION, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 99-1045-S. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. April 9, 2001. *1323 Richard A. Meelheim, Meelheim, Wilkinson & Meelheim, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff. Tracy P. Turner, Johnstone, Ad

PER CURIAM The court of appeals held that a cause of action for acknowledgment of a debt must be "specifically and clearly" pleaded "in plain and emphatic terms." 1 Because this holding conflicts with Rule 47(a) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides that a pleading is "sufficient" if it "give[s] fair notice of t

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-20-00168-CV ________________________ VICKI ALLRED AND CHARLES ALLRED, APPELLANTS V. FREESTONE COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Opinion KAUFMAN, J. The People appeal from a judgment denying their petition for writs of prohibition and mandate. The appeal is meritorious, and the judgment will be reversed with directions to the trial court to issue a peremptory writ of mandate. Facts Susan Michelle Bonner (real party in interest) was charged in the San Bernardino County Municipal Court Distr

NUMBER 13-01-767-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ JAMES R

4 F.Supp.2d 618 (1998) Stanley ZUCKERMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FOXMEYER HEALTH CORP., et al., Defendants. No. 3:96-CV-2258-T. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. March 31, 1998. *619 *620 Jerome M. Congress, Ralph M. Stone, Samuel H. Rudman, Keith M. Fleischman, James

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 51543 ANNE MARIE BEARDSLEE, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent- ) Cross Appellant, ) ) Coeur d’Alene, September 2025 Term v. )

People v Burke (2021 NY Slip Op 06395) People v Burke 2021 NY Slip Op 06395 Decided on November 18, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-15-00713-CV Brian DeRoeck, Melinda Young, and Kathryn Boykin, as co-trustees of the Walter A. DeRoeck QTIP Trust, Assignee of Texas Capital Bank National Association, Appellants v. DHM Ventures, LLC; James W. Moritz; and Nathan W. Halsey, Appellees FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS

360 B.R. 139 (2007) In re JAMES RIVER COAL COMPANY, et al., Debtors. Anthony H.N. Schnelling, as Trustee of the JRCC Unsecured Creditor Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff, v. James B. Crawford, James D. Dotson, William E. Macaulay, Ben A. Guill, John A. Hill, George S. Slocum, John C. Bumgarner, Jr., A. Hugh Ewing, III, Edward A. Snyder, John R. Tellmann, Derrick Varney, J.R. Coal Associates, First Reserve Corporation, American Gas & Oil Invest

The opinion of the court was delivered by Hatcher, C.: This is an appeal by the condemner from a verdict in a condemnation case. There is but a single question requiring our consideration — was it error to admit into evidence the testimony of the landowners and exhibits showing the gross income from the business operated on *690or about

PER CURIAM: James Pullen appeals his convictions of conspiracy to make and of making false statements and reports in connection with loan and credit applications, all in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 371 and 1014. Appellant was first indicted in February 1977. That indictment was dismissed without prejudice upon the government’s motio