Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “James Rushing”
Rushing v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the District of Columbia Court of Appeals denied.
Rushing v. Kellypublic domain
Affirmed.
Stribling v. Rushing's, Inc.public domain
CARLTON, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Earnest Stribling appeals the Hinds County Circuit Court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of Stirling Properties Inc. and Rushing’s Inc. (collectively, Rushing’s). Finding no error, we affirm. FACTS ¶ 2. On November 26, 2008, Stribling and his girlfriend, Elizabeth Veal, entered the Piggly Wiggly on Meadowbrook Road in Jacks
Rushing v. Goodwinpublic domain
In re Rushing, Kevin;—Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of E. Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 587,660; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2010 CA 1482. Denied.
State v. Rushingpublic domain
740 N.W.2d 894 (2007) 2007 WI App 227 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Frederick W. RUSHING, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2006AP3152-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on Briefs September 4, 2007. Opinion Filed September 25, 2007. *895 On behalf of the defendant-appellant
Rushing v. Rushingpublic domain
724 So.2d 911 (1998) Sharon Lynn Goodwin RUSHING v. Todd Russell RUSHING. No. 98-CA-00188-SCT Supreme Court of Mississippi. December 17, 1998. *913 Darnell Felton, W. Ellis Pittman, Aelicia L. Thomas, Clarksdale, Attorneys for Appellant. Arnold Gwin, Attorney for Appellee. Before SULLIVAN, P.J., and BANKS and JAMES
People v. Rushingpublic domain
JUSTICE CHAPMAN delivered the opinion of the court: The defendant, David M. Rushing, was convicted by a jury of reckless driving (625 ILCS 5/11—503 (West 2004)). The court sentenced the defendant to pay a $200 fine. A $20 “Violent Crime” fine was also imposed. It appears that the $20 fine was imposed pursuant to section 10
Rushing v. Statepublic domain
¶ 1. James R. Rushing, Jr., a/k/a Devil Catcher, appeals an order of the Circuit Court of Lauderdale County denying his petition for post-conviction relief. Aggrieved, Rushing asserts the following issues on appeal: I. WHETHER A DEFENDANT IS DENIED DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND FUNDAMENTAL FAIRNESS WHEN THE HEARING JUDGE FINDS THAT HAD THE RECANTING WITNESS TESTIFIED THERE WAS NO WAY TO KNOW WHAT SHE WOULD SAY, WHETHER TO SUPPORT HER TRIAL TESTIMONY OR RECANT IT, AND DENI
In re Jamespublic domain
Published Order Finding Respondent in Contempt of Court and Imposing Sanctions Loretta H. Rush, Chief Justice of Indiana On March 22, 1999, in Case No. 98S00-9809-DI-509, and on August 25, 2000, in Case No. 98S00-0002-DI-101, this Court imposed reciprocal suspensions on Respondent in Indiana based on discipline imposed on Respondent in Kentucky. Respondent was readmitted to practice in Kentucky in 2009
McCULLOUGH, Judge. James Rush sustained a head injury while working at the University of Virginia Hospital. He has no memory of the circumstances of the accident that led to his injury. He challenges the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission’s decision to deny his claim for benefits. Specifically, he argues that the commission err
United States v. Rushingpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Rick Rushing appeals the 57-month sentence imposed on remand from this court following his jury conviction for violating the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, and obstructing proceedings before Department and Agencies in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 7412(f)(4), (h) and 7413(c)(1), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a) and 1319(c)(2)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 1505. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Rushing v. Statepublic domain
85 S.W.3d 283 (2002) Jonathan Daniel RUSHING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. No. 1790-01. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. September 11, 2002. John M. Hurley, Waco, for appellant. James Wiley, Assist. DA, Waco, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for state. OPINION KELLER, P.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in w
Rushing v. Statepublic domain
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING VANCE, Justice. Rushing complains in his Motion for Rehearing that our opinion did not address whether the clerk’s record was properly supplemented to this court. The supplemental record contains various documents from the juvenile court proceeding, especially the order transferring the cause from juvenile court to adult court. We note that Rushing cites to Tex.R.App.P. 47
Scott R. Rushing v. Estate of Ernest R. Minceypublic domain
PER CURIAM: Defendants Ernest R. Mincey and David Last, officers at the Polk County Sheriffs Office, misidentified and arrested Plaintiff Scott R. Rushing. The victim of a crime, Richard Wickman, reported to the Sheriffs office that a roofer he hired to repair hurricane damage to his roof had victimized him. The Plaintiff was arre
James Beasley v. State of Indianapublic domain
James Beasley appeals his convictions for the murder of James Allen and the attempted murder of Gerald Beamon. For the reasons set forth in our companion decision of Lecmdreio Beasley v. State, also issued today, we grant transfer and affirm the trial court’s admission of Beamon’s hearsay testimony regarding statements Allen made to him on the day he died. We find the trial court could have re
State v. Rushingpublic domain
MYSE, J. (concurring). I concur in the result but write separately to emphasize my concern that the "other acts" exception has overwhelmed the general rule that other bad acts are not admissible in evidence. We have greatly relaxed the standards of admissibility for other bad acts in sexual assault cases, especially those involving young children. See State v. Fishnick, 127 Wis. 2d 247, 257, 378 N.W.2d 272, 277-78 (19
James Bogner v. Teresa Bognerpublic domain
DAVID, Justice. Teresa Bogner (Mother) and James Bogner (Father) were married and have one child, H.B. In 2007, when H.B. was just over two years old, the marriage was dissolved. Father was originally ordered to pay $162 per week in child support. In 2008, Father sought to modify his support obligation. The parties agreed under the Indiana Child Support Guidelines that Father’s
State v. Rushingpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA18-1100 Filed: 5 November 2019 Pitt County, Nos. 16 CRS 51635, 51655 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER RUSHING Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 17 August 2016 by Judge Walter H. Godwin, Jr. in Pitt County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 11 April 2019. Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Special
In the Matter of Robert James Hardypublic domain
IN THE Indiana Supreme Court FILED Supreme Court Case No. 24S-DI-438 Jun 23 2026, 1:33 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court In the Matter of Robert James Hardy Jr., Court of Appeals and Tax Court
In the Matter of Robert James Hardypublic domain
IN THE Indiana Supreme Court FILED Supreme Court Case No. 24S-DI-438 Jun 23 2026, 1:33 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court In the Matter of Robert James Hardy Jr., Court of Appeals and Tax Court