⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “James Robert Malcolm, II”

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026-02-18 · Published · cited 0×
[J-10-2025] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 46 EAP 2024 : Appellee : Appeal from the Order of the : Superior Court at
Howard v. Malcolmpublic domain
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987-02-20 · Published · cited 6× · 658 F. Supp. 423; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2980; 107 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 34,965
658 F.Supp. 423 (1987) Milton HOWARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kim MALCOLM, et al., Defendants. No. 85-123-CIV-3. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Fayetteville Division. February 20, 1987. *424 *425 Robert J. Willis, Farmworkers Legal Services of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C.,
Howard v. Malcolmpublic domain
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986-02-12 · Published · cited 8× · 629 F. Supp. 952; 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1113; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29384
629 F.Supp. 952 (1986) Milton HOWARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ken MALCOLM, et al., Defendants. No. 85-123-CIV-3. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Fayetteville Division. February 12, 1986. Robert J. Willis, Farmworkers Legal Services of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for plaintiffs. Charles F. Blackburn, Henderson, N.C., for Ken Malcolm and De
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016-09-28 · Published · cited 0× · 560 B.R. 256
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS Stephani W. Humrickhouse, United States Bankruptcy Judge The matter before the court is the motion, filed jointly by the defendants, to dismiss certain claims for relief in this adversary proceeding. A hearing took place in Wilmington, North Carolina on March 8, 2016. Supplemental briefs were filed by the plaintiff on April 5, 2016, and by the defendants on April 2
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-06-07 · Published · cited 0× · 275 So. 3d 579
Affirmed.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-06-07 · Published · cited 0× · 275 So. 3d 579
Affirmed.
Indiana Supreme Court · 2026-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE Indiana Supreme Court FILED Supreme Court Case No. 24S-DI-438 Jun 23 2026, 1:33 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court In the Matter of Robert James Hardy Jr., Court of Appeals and Tax Court
Indiana Supreme Court · 2026-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE Indiana Supreme Court FILED Supreme Court Case No. 24S-DI-438 Jun 23 2026, 1:33 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court In the Matter of Robert James Hardy Jr., Court of Appeals and Tax Court
Indiana Supreme Court · 2026-06-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE Indiana Supreme Court FILED Supreme Court Case No. 24S-DI-438 Jun 23 2026, 1:33 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court In the Matter of Robert James Hardy Jr., Court of Appeals and Tax Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-04-10 · Published · cited 0×
04/10/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 16, 2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MALCOLM WADE FRAZIER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Van Buren County No. 2660-F Larry B. Stanley, Jr., Judge ___________________________________
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA S.J., NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D16-3635 MALCOLM THOMAS and SCHOOL BOARD FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, Appellees. ____
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992-04-01 · Published · cited 19× · 790 F. Supp. 576; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4801; 1992 WL 72578
790 F.Supp. 576 (1992) VENTURTECH II, Limited Partnership; North Riverside Venture, Inc.; and Heritage Capital Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. LEARNING RESOURCES, INC., Kitty Hawk Capital, Inc., Christopher W. Hegele, Robert L. Chapman, and Thomas Barry, Third-Party Defendants and Additional Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. GREYLOCK PARTNERS & CO.; Advanced Technology Dev
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1992-02-24 · Published · cited 13× · 790 F. Supp. 574; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8183; 1992 WL 104310
790 F.Supp. 574 (1992) VENTURTECH II, Limited Partnership; North Riverside Venture, Inc.; and Heritage Capital Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. LEARNING RESOURCES, INC., Kitty Hawk Capital, Inc., Christopher W. Hegele, Robert L. Chapman, and Thomas Barry, Third-Party Defendants and Additional Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. GREYLOCK PARTNERS & CO.; Advanced Technology Dev
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2024-12-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LKQ CORPORATION, § § Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, § No. 110, 2024 Appellant, § § Certification of Questions of v. § Law from the United States § Court of Appeals for the Seventh ROBERT RUTLEDGE, § Circuit (No. 23-233
Montana Supreme Court · 2009-09-14 · Published · cited 20× · 2009 MT 285; 217 P.3d 514; 352 Mont. 325; 2009 Mont. LEXIS 450
JUSTICE NELSON, concurring in part and dissenting in part. ¶117 I concur in the Court’s Opinion as to Issues 1, 2, and 3 but dissent as to Issue 4. ¶118 At the outset, I note that this is the second time in as many years that this Court has stripped plaintiffs of hard-earned and well-deserved jury awards of punitive
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-06-07 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT S.K. CONDOMINIUM II ASSOCIATION, ) INC. and SKBP, LLC, ) ) Appellants, )
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-06-28 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 27, 2012 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MALCOLM WITHEROW Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 270539 Rebecca J. Stern, Judge No. E2012-00131-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 28, 2013 A Hamilton County jury convicted the Defendant-Appellant, Malcolm Witherow, of first degree murder for wh
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025-09-22 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ Nos. 24-2639 and 24-2640 _______________ ROBERT SOFALY v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC JP WARD & ASSOCIATES; TRAVIS A. GORDON; JOSHUA WARD,* Appellants *Under Fed. R. App. P. 12(a) DAMIEN MALCOLM v
State v. Malcolmpublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001-08-21 · Published · cited 8× · 257 Conn. 653; 778 A.2d 134; 2001 Conn. LEXIS 346
*655 Opinion SULLIVAN, J. The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court improperly granted the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, on the grounds that, in accepting the guilty plea, the trial court had failed to mention specifically all three immigration and naturalization consequences listed in General Statutes § 54-lj
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004-08-31 · Published · cited 0× · 123 Wash. App. 99
Quinn-Brintnall, C.J. Harm Leroy Meints appeals from an order committing him for treatment as a sexually violent predator (SVP) under chapter 71.09 RCW. *101Meints challenges the trial court’s CR 35 order requiring that he submit to a mental examination and its ruling excluding evidence of his mental state when he refused to comply with the order. Ten m