Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “James Robert Malcolm, II”
Commonwealth v. Malcolm, R., Aplt.public domain
[J-10-2025] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT TODD, C.J., DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, BROBSON, McCAFFERY, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 46 EAP 2024 : Appellee : Appeal from the Order of the : Superior Court at
Howard v. Malcolmpublic domain
658 F.Supp. 423 (1987) Milton HOWARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kim MALCOLM, et al., Defendants. No. 85-123-CIV-3. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Fayetteville Division. February 20, 1987. *424 *425 Robert J. Willis, Farmworkers Legal Services of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C.,
Howard v. Malcolmpublic domain
629 F.Supp. 952 (1986) Milton HOWARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ken MALCOLM, et al., Defendants. No. 85-123-CIV-3. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Fayetteville Division. February 12, 1986. Robert J. Willis, Farmworkers Legal Services of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for plaintiffs. Charles F. Blackburn, Henderson, N.C., for Ken Malcolm and De
Butler v. Enhanced Equity Fund II, LP (In re American Ambulette & Ambulance Service, Inc.)public domain
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS Stephani W. Humrickhouse, United States Bankruptcy Judge The matter before the court is the motion, filed jointly by the defendants, to dismiss certain claims for relief in this adversary proceeding. A hearing took place in Wilmington, North Carolina on March 8, 2016. Supplemental briefs were filed by the plaintiff on April 5, 2016, and by the defendants on April 2
S.K. Condo. II Ass'n, Inc. v. NS/Cse Siesta Key, LLCpublic domain
Affirmed.
S.K. Condo. II Ass'n, Inc. v. NS/Cse Siesta Key, LLCpublic domain
Affirmed.
In the Matter of Robert James Hardypublic domain
IN THE Indiana Supreme Court FILED Supreme Court Case No. 24S-DI-438 Jun 23 2026, 1:33 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court In the Matter of Robert James Hardy Jr., Court of Appeals and Tax Court
In the Matter of Robert James Hardypublic domain
IN THE Indiana Supreme Court FILED Supreme Court Case No. 24S-DI-438 Jun 23 2026, 1:33 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court In the Matter of Robert James Hardy Jr., Court of Appeals and Tax Court
In the Matter of Robert James Hardypublic domain
IN THE Indiana Supreme Court FILED Supreme Court Case No. 24S-DI-438 Jun 23 2026, 1:33 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court In the Matter of Robert James Hardy Jr., Court of Appeals and Tax Court
State of Tennessee v. Malcolm Wade Frazierpublic domain
04/10/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 16, 2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MALCOLM WADE FRAZIER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Van Buren County No. 2660-F Larry B. Stanley, Jr., Judge ___________________________________
S. J. v. Malcolm Thomaspublic domain
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA S.J., NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D16-3635 MALCOLM THOMAS and SCHOOL BOARD FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, Appellees. ____
VENTURTECH II v. Deloitte Haskins & Sellspublic domain
790 F.Supp. 576 (1992) VENTURTECH II, Limited Partnership; North Riverside Venture, Inc.; and Heritage Capital Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. LEARNING RESOURCES, INC., Kitty Hawk Capital, Inc., Christopher W. Hegele, Robert L. Chapman, and Thomas Barry, Third-Party Defendants and Additional Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. GREYLOCK PARTNERS & CO.; Advanced Technology Dev
VENTURTECH II v. Deloitte Haskins & Sellspublic domain
790 F.Supp. 574 (1992) VENTURTECH II, Limited Partnership; North Riverside Venture, Inc.; and Heritage Capital Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. DELOITTE HASKINS & SELLS, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. LEARNING RESOURCES, INC., Kitty Hawk Capital, Inc., Christopher W. Hegele, Robert L. Chapman, and Thomas Barry, Third-Party Defendants and Additional Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. GREYLOCK PARTNERS & CO.; Advanced Technology Dev
LKQ Corporation v. Robert Rutledgepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LKQ CORPORATION, § § Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, § No. 110, 2024 Appellant, § § Certification of Questions of v. § Law from the United States § Court of Appeals for the Seventh ROBERT RUTLEDGE, § Circuit (No. 23-233
Malcolm v. EVENFLO CO., INC.public domain
JUSTICE NELSON, concurring in part and dissenting in part. ¶117 I concur in the Court’s Opinion as to Issues 1, 2, and 3 but dissent as to Issue 4. ¶118 At the outset, I note that this is the second time in as many years that this Court has stripped plaintiffs of hard-earned and well-deserved jury awards of punitive
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT S.K. CONDOMINIUM II ASSOCIATION, ) INC. and SKBP, LLC, ) ) Appellants, )
State of Tennessee v. Malcolm Witherowpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 27, 2012 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MALCOLM WITHEROW Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 270539 Rebecca J. Stern, Judge No. E2012-00131-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 28, 2013 A Hamilton County jury convicted the Defendant-Appellant, Malcolm Witherow, of first degree murder for wh
Robert Sofaly v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLCpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ Nos. 24-2639 and 24-2640 _______________ ROBERT SOFALY v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC JP WARD & ASSOCIATES; TRAVIS A. GORDON; JOSHUA WARD,* Appellants *Under Fed. R. App. P. 12(a) DAMIEN MALCOLM v
State v. Malcolmpublic domain
*655 Opinion SULLIVAN, J. The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court improperly granted the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea, on the grounds that, in accepting the guilty plea, the trial court had failed to mention specifically all three immigration and naturalization consequences listed in General Statutes § 54-lj
In re the Detention of Meintspublic domain
Quinn-Brintnall, C.J. Harm Leroy Meints appeals from an order committing him for treatment as a sexually violent predator (SVP) under chapter 71.09 RCW. *101Meints challenges the trial court’s CR 35 order requiring that he submit to a mental examination and its ruling excluding evidence of his mental state when he refused to comply with the order. Ten m