Cases

ORDER WARRINER, District Judge. Defendant Reginald C. Reilly had filed a motion under Rule 35(b) for a reduction of his sentence. The motion is occasioned by the occurrence of frequent attacks of angina pectoris which, in the opinion of his physician, result from conditions of stress incident to defendant’s incarceration. The motion was filed within 120 days after sentencing but it was

460 F.Supp.2d 915 (2006) REGINALD MARTIN AGENCY, INC., Comprehensive Insurance Marketing, Inc., Design Benefits, Inc., Jim Jasnoski, Design Benefits, Inc., Kenny Froug, Atlanta Brokerage Office, Brokerage One Agency, Inc., Tri-State Brokerage, Inc., Don Sepulveda, Sepulveda Insurance Group, Dean Vandersnick, Professional Insurance Brokerage, Whitewater Brokerage, Inc., Professional Insurance Brokerage, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. CONSECO MEDICAL INSURAN

582 A.2d 1199 (1990) Reginald B. WHITE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 89-949. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Submitted October 19, 1990. Decided December 7, 1990. *1200 Carmen A. Jacobs, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant. Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., John R. Fisher, Tho

TARANTO, Circuit Judge. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7521, an agency may furlough an administrative law judge (ALJ) for 30 days or less “only for good cause established and determined by the Merit Systems Protection Board” in a formal adjudication. In this case, the Board determined that the Department of Labor had good cause for its decision to furlough its ALJs for a par

192 Mich. App. 724 (1992) 482 N.W.2d 197 MOLL v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES Docket Nos. 115542, 115550. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided February 3, 1992, at 9:25 A.M. Barr & Arsenault (by Charles J. Barr and Bodo Schimers), for the plaintiffs. Schureman, Frakes, Glass & Wulfmeier (by Cheryl Chandler</

ORDER AND REASONS CARL J. BARBIER, District Judge. Before the Court is a 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Rec. Doc. 10), filed by Defendants, the City of Slidell and six of its employees (collectively “the City Defendants”). Plaintiff has filed an opposition (Rec. Doc. 12), to which the City Defendants have replied. (Rec. Doc. 25) Both the Plaintiff and the City Defendan

494 F.Supp. 194 (1980) Barbara BARNES, May Bigtree, Donnal Cole, Martha Cook, Solomon Cook, Julius Herne, Richard L. Jock, Beulah Terrance, Carol Terrance and Hilda Smoke, Comprising the Concerned Committee of Enrolled Members, Plaintiffs, v. Reginald WHITE, Leonard Garrow, Rudolph Hart, Sr., Leonard Beaubien, Cecil Garrow and Francis Arquette, Defendants. No. 80-CV-319. United States District Court, N

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 99-1862 CARLOS GARCIA, Petitioner, Appellant, v. PAUL MURPHY, SUPERINTENDENT, Respondent, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Reginald C. Lindsa

PAEZ, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s dismissal of their suit on the basis of forum non conveniens. Plaintiffs, citizens of New Zealand, are victims of an airplane crash in New Zealand, on a New Zealand carrier. Plaintiffs allege that the radio altimeter of the Ground Proximity Warning System (“GPWS”) malfunctioned during flight and was a causal factor of the accident. Defendants, the Canadian manufac

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge. This pharmaceutical multi-district litigation (“MDL”) action is pending for consideration of the plaintiffs’ motion for a suggestion of remand in the above-captioned cases. [MDL Record No. 3034] In each case, the plaintiffs argue that the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(11)(C)(1), entitles them to remand to the Uni

546 Pa. 12 (1996) 682 A.2d 1250 Darlene ARTHUR v. Carol KUCHAR and Debra Spaeder. Appeal of Debra SPAEDER. Darlene ARTHUR v. Carol KUCHAR and Debra Spaeder. Appeal of Carol KUCHAR. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 5, 1996. Decided September 17, 1996. *13

961 A.2d 66 (2008) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. Michael FITHIAN, Appellee. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant v. Edward Borzelleca, Appellee. No. 10 MAP 2008, No. 11 MAP 2008. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued May 13, 2008. Decided December 17, 2008. *68 James Francis X. Reilly,

WORKMAN, Justice, concurring in part, and dissenting in part: (Filed September 19, 2017) The one and only issue properly before this Court is whether the circuit court erred in granting a preliminary injunction of the Workplace Freedom Act,1 also known as the “right to w

153 F.Supp.2d 101 (2001) CONNECTICUT PIPE TRADES HEALTH FUND, et al., v. PHILIP MORRIS, INC., et al. No. 397CV1305(JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 21, 2001. *102 Melvyn I. Weiss, Michael C. Spencer, Beth A. Kaswan, Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes & Lerach, New York City, Robert M. Cheverie, Cheverie &

353 F.Supp.2d 170 (2005) MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY, Plaintiff v. NOVARTIS OPHTHALMICS, INC. and QLT, Inc., Defendants QLT, Inc., Counterclaimant v. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Evangelos S. Gragoudas, M.D., and Joan W. Miller, M.D., Counterdefendants. The General Hospital Corporation, Intervenor v. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Evangelos S. Gragoudas, M.D., and Joan W. Miller, M.D., Defendants to I

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge. Moving Defendants Merchant Services, Inc., Universal Card, Inc., National Payment Processing, Inc., Universal Merchant Services, LLC, Jason Moore, Eric Madura, Nathan Jurczyk, Robert Parisi and Alicyn Roy (hereinafter, Movants) move for partial summary judgment on the claims brought against them by Plaintiff Volker Von Gl

34 F.3d 172 30 Fed.R.Serv.3d 215 John COLLINS; Shirley Collins, his wife; John Wojenski;Robert Austin; Juanita Austin, his wife; John Carew;Ferdinand Pena; Regina Pena, his wife; Louis Madarasz;Ben Davis; Berline Davis, his wife; Charles Staten; MaryStaten, his wife; Rudy Troupe; Bernice Troupe, hiswife; Wilfredo Rodriguez; Charlie Dewitt; Julia Dewitt,his wife; Luis Basadre; Ray

HUTCHINSON, Justice, concurring. I join the majority opinion but write to reiterate the views expressed in my Concurring Opinion filed this date in Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 507 Pa. 204, 489 A.2d 1291 (1985).

444 F.Supp. 785 (1975) PRUNE BARGAINING ASSOCIATION, a non-profit Cooperative Association, J. Massoni and Edward Massoni, as copartners doing business as J. & E. Massoni, Ben W. McCutchan and W. O. McCutchan, Jr., as co-partners doing business as McCutchan Ranches, J. A. Breeding, John A. Breeding, Jr., and Lester B. Breeding, as co-partners doing business as J. A. Breeding & Sons, Louis Matteucci and James Matteucci, as copartners doing business

OPINION BY STABILE, J.: Appellant Charles P. McCullough ("McCullough") appeals from the December 17, 2015 judgment of sentence entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County ("trial court"), following his bench convictions for five counts of theft by unlawful taking and five counts of misapplication of entrusted funds. 1