Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “James R. Spratt”
State v. Sprattpublic domain
31 S.W.3d 587 (2000) STATE of Tennessee v. Jimmie C. SPRATT. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Jackson. June 8, 2000. *592 A.C. Wharton, Jr. and M. Dell Stiner, Memphis, TN, for appellant, Jimmie C. Spratt. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, R. Stephen Jobe, Assistant Attorney General, William L. Gibbons, District Att
Spratt v. Forbespublic domain
705 A.2d 991 (1997) Karen SPRATT, et all., v. James E. FORBES and Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. No. 96-407-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. December 5, 1997. Paul S. Cantor, Providence. Edward Grourke, Pawtucket. ORDER On November 18, 1997, this case came before a three member panel of the Supreme Court for oral argument pursuant to an order di
Spratt v. Crete Carrier Corp.public domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/17/2022 08:09 AM CDT - 262 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports SPRATT v. CRETE CARRIER CORP. Cite as 311 Neb. 262 James R. Spratt, appellant, v.
Spratt v. Crete Carrier Corp.public domain
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/15/2022 12:07 AM CDT - 262 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports SPRATT v. CRETE CARRIER CORP. Cite as 311 Neb. 262 James R. Spratt, appellant, v.
Spratt v. Statepublic domain
833 So.2d 662 (2001) Darrell SPRATT v. STATE. CR-99-1957. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. May 25, 2001. Opinion on Return to Remand October 26, 2001. Rehearing Denied January 25, 2002. Certiorari Denied April 19, 2002. *663 J. Tony Glenn, Hamilton, for appellant. Bil
In Re Sprattpublic domain
170 Mich. App. 719 (1988) 428 N.W.2d 754 In re SPRATT Docket No. 105222. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 16, 1988. Marks & Smith, P.C. (by Michael R. Smith), Guardian Ad Litem, for the minor child. Dimmers & Boyd (by Daniel P. Boyd), for respondent. Before: WEAVER, P.J., and GILLIS and M.J.
Spratt v. Statepublic domain
315 Md. 680 (1989) 556 A.2d 667 KIP D. SPRATT v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 7, September Term, 1988. Court of Appeals of Maryland. April 14, 1989. Julia Doyle Bernhardt, Asst. Public Defender (Alan H. Murrell, Public Defender, on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner. Ann N. Bosse, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., on brief)
James v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Educationpublic domain
300 S.E.2d 21 (1983) Larry JAMES, Guardian ad Litem for Kristin Marie JAMES, a Minor v. The CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION and Susan Stewart. No. 8226SC95. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 15, 1983. *22 Ervin, Kornfeld, MacNeill & Ervin by John C. MacNeill, Jr. and Winfred R. Ervin, Jr., Charlotte, for p
Spratt v. Alsuppublic domain
468 N.E.2d 1059 (1984) Thomas SPRATT, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George ALSUP, Defendant-Appellee. No. 3-383A83. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Third District. April 10, 1984. Ordered Published April 26, 1984. Rehearing Denied July 23, 1984. Transfer Denied October 15, 1984. *1060<
Lenahan v. Tjx Companies, Inc.public domain
*********** Upon review of the competent evidence of record, with reference to the errors assigned, and finding good grounds to receive further evidence, but not to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission, upon reconsideration of the evidence, affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, with modifications, and enters the following Opinion and Award. ***********<
Spratt v. Statepublic domain
DONIELSON, Judge. The petitioner-defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for postconviction relief, which challenged his 1977 conviction for breaking and entering with intent to commit a public offense, to-wit: larceny. Defendant contends that: (1) the prosecutor at his 1977 trial suppressed exculpatory evidence, (2) certain instructions shifted the burden of proof on the presence of criminal intent f
Sbarboro v. Vollalapublic domain
911 N.E.2d 553 (2009) James R. SBARBORO, Independent Adm'r of the Estate of John L. Sbarboro, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Raghu VOLLALA; Alan B. Spacone; Alan B. Spacone, Ltd., a Corporation; VHS of Illinois, Inc., d/b/a MacNeal Health Network; MacNeal Hospital; MacNeal Home Care; and MacNeal Hospice, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1-07-3236. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division
Rommel v. Illinois State Toll Highway Authoritypublic domain
938 N.E.2d 1163 (2010) Barbara ROMMEL, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Timothy Rommel, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The ILLINOIS STATE TOLL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY and Caritina Moncada-Jaime, Defendants-Appellees (James Neukirch, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Mark E. Neukirch, Deceased; Stephen Kugelman, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Matthew Kugelman, Deceased; Jeanine Dombrow, as Special Administ
Brobeck v. Pierce Leahy Corp.public domain
The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence. However, upon much detailed reconsideration of the evidence, the undersigned reach the same facts and conclusions as those reached by the Deputy Commissioner, with some modification. The Full Commission, in their discretion, have determined that there are no good grounds in this case to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, as sufficient convincing evidence exists in the record to supp
Eddie Griffin v. John Spratt and J. Kevin Kanepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT ALITO, Circuit Judge: Two state corrections officials appeal from a judgment entered against them under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for allegedly violating a prisoner’s due process rights in connection with a prison disciplinary proceeding. One of the offenses for which the prisoner was found guilty at the disciplinary proceeding was possession or
Carringer v. Coca-Cola Bottlingpublic domain
*********** Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the award, except for some modifications, the Full Commission MODIFIES AND AFFIRMS the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** The Full Commi
Spratt v. Duke Power Co.public domain
310 S.E.2d 38 (1983) 65 N.C. App. 457 Gregory E. SPRATT v. DUKE POWER COMPANY. No. 8210IC1000. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 20, 1983. *39 W. Edward Poe, Jr., Asst. Gen. Counsel, Duke Power Co., Charlotte, for defendant-appellant. Davis & Corriher by James A. Corriher, Salisburg,
Hood v. Sprattpublic domain
357 So.2d 135 (1978) Adrienne Spratt HOOD v. Edith Tubb SPRATT. No. 50176. Supreme Court of Mississippi. April 5, 1978. *136 Burgin, Gholson, Hicks & Nichols, Dewitt T. Hicks, Jr., Columbus, for appellant. J.O. Prude, Amory, for appellee. Before PATTERSON, BROOM and BOWLING, JJ. PATTERSON, Chief Justice,
In Re W.R. Grace & Co.public domain
389 B.R. 373 (2008) In re W.R. GRACE & CO., et al., Debtors. No. 01-01139. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. May 29, 2008. *374 James E. O'Neill, Kathleen P. Makowski, Laura Davis Jones, Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, Wilmington, DE, Michael R. Lastowski, Duane Morris LLP, Wilmington, DE, Paula Ann Galbraith, Chica
State of Tennessee v. James Michael Moffittpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 17, 2004 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES MICHAEL MOFFITT Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamblen County No. 02CR164 James E. Beckner, Judge No. E2003-01614-CCA-R3-CD - Filed December 13, 2004 The defendant, James Michael Moffitt, appeals from