Cases

796 F.Supp.2d 753 (2011) James R. SHERMAN, Plaintiff, v. LITTON LOAN SERVICING, L.P. and Glasser and Glasser, P.L.C., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:10cv567. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. July 5, 2011. *754 Heath J. Thompson, Rachel Elizabeth Wentworth, Heath J. Thompson, P.C.,

PER CURIAM. We initially accepted review of the decision in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Sherman, 79 So.3d 887 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), a per curiam affirmance citing to R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Brown, 70 So.3d 707 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), because we accepted jurisdiction in Brown based on express and direct conflict. We have since discharged jurisdiction in Brown. Therefore, there is no basis

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See R.J. Reynolds Co. v. Brown, 70 So.3d 707 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). MAY, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

*671 MARTIN, Chief Judge. Defendant Travis Melton Sherman was charged with the murder of Kenneth Edward Ring in violation of N.C.G.S. § 14-17. A jury found defendant guilty of first-degree murder, and judgment was entered on the verdict sentencing him to life imprisonment without parole. He appeals.

ORDER David C. Godbey, United States District Judge This Order addresses Defendant Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.’s (“Walmart”) motion to dismiss for lack of standing [15]. Because Plaintiff Colleen Sherman has a property interest in her employment discrimination claim, the Court denies the motion. I. Origins op the Dispute This case arises from Sherman’s em-.

985 A.2d 1042 (2010) 294 Conn. 548 Lawrence C. SHERMAN v. Eugene C. RONCO et al. No. 18320. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Argued September 21, 2009. Decided January 26, 2010. *1044 Robert F. Ludgin, Hartford, for the appellant (plaintiff). Thomas R. Gerarde, Hartford, for the appell

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW JAMES R. SACCA, Bankruptcy Judge. Divorce, business failure, bankruptcy: all involve chapters drawing to a close, with fresh starts to follow. Many of us are fortunate enough to avoid these bittersweet — and sometimes just bitter — new beginnings. But the unfortunate ex-spouses who are the Plaintiff and Defendant in this adversary proceeding experienced all three in

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge. The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification. The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Mag

DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 3, 2024 In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-01218-CV JAMES BLAKLEY, Appellant V. SHERMAN EXPRESS, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

PER CURIAM. In these consolidated appeals, Sherman Township appeals as of right the trial court’s order denying its motion for summary disposition and a subsequent order awarding costs and attorney fees to Joseph A. Leemreis and Lori M. Leemreis. The Leem-reises appeal as of right, contending that the trial court should have awarded them more costs and attorney fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and vacate the trial court’

J-E02005-14 2015 PA Super 110 THERESA M. WOLFE, ADMINISTRATRIX IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF OF THE ESTATE OF KEVIN T. WOLFE, PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. ROBERT ROSS, Appellee v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee No. 1048 WDA 2012 Appeal from th

DECISION The Defendant, Kent County Memorial Hospital ("Kent"), moves for leave to amend its answer to add additional affirmative defenses. The Plaintiffs, Stephanie M. O'Brien and Michael O'Brien, individually and as next friend of Brendan O'Brien, a minor, ("Plaintiffs"), object to Kent's motion. For the reasons stated below, this Court denies Kent's Motion to Amend. <

DECISION This matter is before the Court on Defendant Kent County Memorial Hospital's Motion to Compel a Further Response to its Third Request for Production. Specifically, Kent County Memorial Hospital (Hospital) is attempting to obtain a notebook, prepared by Stephanie M. O'Brien, after she discussed the case with an attorney. Mrs. O'Brien contends the notebook is work-product protected by the provisions of Super. R. C

OPINION OF THE COURT PRATTER, District Judge. The federal government prosecuted Sherman Bobb, contending that he was a kingpin in a drug trafficking operation in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. Following a seven-day trial, the jury convicted him of (1) conspiracy to distribute in excess of 5 kilograms of cocaine, in excess of 1.5 kilograms of cocaine base

296 S.W.3d 193 (2009) The METHODIST HOSPITAL, Appellant v. Beverley SHEPHERD-SHERMAN, Appellee. No. 14-08-01090-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). August 20, 2009. *195 Dwight Willis Scott Jr., Stephanie Laird Tolson, Houston, TX, Michael H. Rubin, Baton Rouge, LA, for appellants. Jimmy Williamson, Oscar

646 F.3d 1161 (2011) SIERRA FOREST LEGACY; Center for Biological Diversity; Natural Resources Defense Council; Sierra Club; The Wilderness Society, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Harris SHERMAN, in his official capacity as Under Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment, U.S. Department of Agriculture; Tom Tidwell, in his official capacity as Chief of the U.S. Forest Service; Randy Moore, in his official capacity as Regional Forester, U.S.

786 F.Supp.2d 171 (2011) NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANK, et al., Petitioners, v. SHERMAN AVENUE ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al., Respondents. Miscellaneous Action No. 11-0083(BAH). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 17, 2011. *172 Bryn H. Sherman, James M. Hoffman, Offit Kurman, P.A., Bethesda, MD, for Petitioners. J

POSNER, Chief Judge. This case began in an Illinois state court as a suit for defamation and other torts brought by attorney James Sullivan against James Conway, an official of the electrical workers’ union, and against the union itself. The alleged defamation was that Conway had said that Sullivan was “a very poor lawyer.” The suit was removed to federal district court after

516 S.E.2d 864 (1999) Walter Lee HEARNE, Petitioner, v. Wayne SHERMAN, Health Director of Chatham County, and Chatham County, Respondents. No. 309A98. Supreme Court of North Carolina. July 23, 1999. *865 McSurely & Osment, by Alan McSurely and Ashley Osment, Chapel Hill, for petitioner-appellant. Womble Carlyle Sandrid

PER CURIAM: Durmg a two-month period m 1988, appellant, in an apparent effort to feed his *1366 drug habit, committed four bank robberies. He was convicted in state court for the third and fourth robberies and sentenced to prison terms of five and a half year