Cases

LINDER, J. The state petitions for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Allen, 198 Or App 392, 108 P3d 651 (2005), in which we vacated the sentences of two of defendant’s three drug offense convictions and remanded for resentencing. Defendant asserted that the imposition of a departure sentence on two of those convictions based on a judicial finding that he was on supervision at the time of the crime violated t

108 P.3d 651 (2005) 198 Or. App. 392 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Samuel James ALLEN, Appellant. C002847CR and C011876CR; A117220 (Control) and A117851. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Petition for Reconsideration April 23, 2004. Petition for Reconsideration June 1, 2004. Decided March 16, 2005. Peter A. Ozann

OPINION CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge: Jocelyn Allen and others (Plaintiffs) sued The Boeing Company (Boeing) and Landau Associates (Landau) in Washington state court, alleging that for several decades Boeing released toxins into the groundwater around its facility in Auburn, Washington,'and'that'for over a decade Landau had been negligent in its investigati

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:- This putative class action challenges the use of red light cameras within Texas and, more specifically, the legislation authorizing such cameras. The case was originally filed in state court and subsequently removed to federal court. We must decide whether it should have been remanded.1 BACKGROUND Chapter 707 of the Texas Transportatio

PER CURIAM Motion for relief from default granted; reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn; affirmed. State v. Perez, 340 Or 310, 131 P3d 168 (2006); State v. Gornick, 340 Or 160, 130 P3d 780 (2006).

322 B.R. 280 (2005) Mopsy ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KUHLMAN CORPORATION, et al., Defendants, M.L. Berry, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kuhlman Corporation, et al., Defendants. James Cohn, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kuhlman Corporation, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 3:04CV134LN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. March 15, 2005.</

Justice WAINWRIGHT delivered the opinion of the Court. In 2003, the Texas Legislature amended the Gas Utility Regulatory Act (GURA) to allow gas utilities (Utilities) an opportunity to recover capital investments in Texas’ gas pipeline infrastructure made during the interim period between rate cases filed pursuant to Chapter 104, Subchapter C, of the Utilities Code. Act of May 16, 2003, 78th Leg., R. S., ch. 93

494 F.Supp. 107 (1980) UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner, and Dow Chemical Company, Intervening Petitioner, v. Dr. James R. ALLEN and John Van Miller, Respondents, and James P. Wachtendonk, Mary S. Wachtendonk, Ree Anne Wachtendonk and Zachary James Wachtendonk; Robert W. Green, now Deceased, and Cheryl A. Green, the widow of the veteran Robert W. Green, now Deceased; Charles Chapman and Kuniko Chapman, Individually and on beha

578 F.Supp. 468 (1982) UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner, and The Dow Chemical Company, Intervening Petitioner, v. Dr. James R. ALLEN and John Van Miller, Respondents, and James P. Wachtendonk, Mary S. Wachtendonk, Ree Anne Wachtendonk and Zachary James Wachtendonk; Robert W. Green, now deceased, and Cheryl A. Green, the widow of the veteran Robert W. Green, now deceased; Charles Chapman and Kuniko Chapman, individually and on

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan September 4, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan November 20, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

409 F.Supp.2d 672 (2006) Elsie Marie ALLEN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Donna Lea Swaim, Plaintiff, v. GREENVILLE HOTEL PARTNERS, INC., and R.G. Hospitality, LLC, and Ronald Gedda, and Choice Hotels International, Inc., and R.G. Properties, LLC, Defendants. Kieth Barfield, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Allison Barfield Plaintiff, v. Choice Hotels International, Inc., R.G. Hospitality, LLC, Greenville Hote

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-18-00055-CR JAMES ALLEN JACKSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 273rd District Court Sabine County, Texas Trial Court No. CR1607301 Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess

405 F.Supp.2d 653 (2005) Elsie Marie ALLEN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Donna Lea Swaim, Plaintiff, v. GREENVILLE HOTEL PARTNERS, INC., and R.G. Hospitality, LLC, and Ronald Gedda, and Choice Hotels International, Inc., and R.G. Properties, LLC, Defendants. Keith Barfield, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Allison Barfield, Plaintiff, v. Choice Hotels International, Inc., RG Hospitality, LLC, Greenville Hotel

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-18-00053-CR JAMES ALLEN JACKSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 273rd District Court Sabine County, Texas Trial Court No. CR1607299 Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-18-00054-CR JAMES ALLEN JACKSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 273rd District Court Sabine County, Texas Trial Court No. CR1607300 Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00677-CV Mark Edwin ALLEN, Appellant v. Cherelle M. ALLEN,

*206 OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. At issue in this case is the disposition of more than 14,000 actions filed by some 30,000 to 35,000 plaintiffs pending before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania as part of the Multidistrict Di

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00574-CV James Allen Brickley, Jr., Appellant v. Marie Laurence Gloria Joseph-Stephen, Appellee FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 22DFAM331978, THE HONORABLE STEVEN J. DUSKIE, JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER PER CU

Corrigan, C.J. In these consolidated cases, this Court once again faces whether the plain language of § 7 of the governmental tort liability act, MCL 691.1407, permits a trespass-nuisance exception to governmental immunity. Because the Legislature’s *679definition of the word “state” is clear and unambiguous, we hold that it