Cases

OPINION AND ORDER1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Dyck-O’Neal, Inc.’s (“DONI”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 87), to which Plaintiffs respond in opposition (Doc. 92). The parties also filed supplement briefs and authorities. (Doc. 95; Doe. 96; Doc. 97; Doc. 98). After considering the parties’

3 A.3d 277 (2010) N.A. LAMBRECHT and Miriam Loveman, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. Stanley O'NEAL, et al., Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 135, 2010. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: July 7, 2010. Decided: August 27, 2010. *278 Adam L. Balick, and Melony R. Anderson, Esquires, of Balick & Balick, LLC

MEMORANDUM ORDER JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge. In this massive litigation, arising from the huge losses experienced by Merrill Lynch & Co. (“Merrill”) in the period prior to its acquisition by Bank of America (“BofA”), two of the lawsuits — a consolidated action known as the Derivative Action, 07 Civ. 9696, and a later-filed action, Lambrecht v. O’Neal, originally filed a

673 F.Supp.2d 974 (2009) Kendrick PATTERSON, Adam Bergman, Michael Attianese, Andrea Levy, Daryl Yeakle, and Raymond R. Plante, each individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and the general public, Plaintiffs, v. Stephen V. O'NEAL, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated; Thomas Hill, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated; Ellen L. Bastier, individually and on behalf of those similarly situated;

[Cite as O'Neal v. O'Neal, 2022-Ohio-372.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA KATHLEEN PERRY O’NEAL, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 110114 v. : KENNETH JOSH O’NEAL, :

ORDER HENRY LEE ADAMS, JR., United States District Judge This Cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Conditionally Certify Collective Action (Dkt.16) and Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a Reply (Dkt. 45). Background Plaintiffs Complaint seeks overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standar

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as O’Neal v. State, Slip Opinion No. 2021-Ohio-3663.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-14-00145-CR MARK HINTON O’NEAL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 123rd District Court Panola County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013-C0383 Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess

This is an original proceeding in mandamus filed by relator Phil P. O'Neal. Relator asks this Court to compel respondent Gary W. Stovall, official court reporter for the 33rd Judicial District Court of San Saba County, to prepare a statement of facts in our cause number 12,955, Phil P. O'Neal v. County of San Saba. The transcript in that cause was filed with the Clerk of this Court on November 2, 1978. After about a three-day trial, the jury returned its verdict on September 17

ACCEPTED 06-14-00145-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 1/9/2015 3:59:52 PM DEBBIE AUT

577 S.W.2d 795 (1979) Phil P. O'NEAL, Appellant, v. The COUNTY OF SAN SABA, Appellee. No. 16211. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin. February 21, 1979. James A. Childress, Senterfitt, Adams, Miller & Childress, San Saba, for appellant. Warden Terry, County Atty., San Saba, for appellee. SHANNON, Justice. Appellant, Phil P. O'Neal, has f

594 S.W.2d 185 (1980) Phil P. O'NEAL, v. The COUNTY OF SAN SABA. No. 12955. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin. January 16, 1980. Rehearing Denied February 27, 1980. James A. Childress, Senterfitt, Adams, Miller & Childress, San Saba, and Shannon H. Ratliff, S. Jack Balagia, Jr., McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, Austin, for appellant.

350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black

977 A.2d 326 (2009) Joyce O'NEAL, as Administrator of the Estate of Elizabeth Reader, Ashley Reader, James Reader and Joyce O'Neal, as Guardian of Samantha Malinowski, Appellants, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Appellees. No. 503, 2008. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: May 21, 2009. Decided: July

603 S.E.2d 402 (2004) Carl ADAMS, Doyle Woodrow Alexander, Audrey Louise Allison, Albert William Arrington, Jr., James Ronnie Arrington, Judith Hope Arrington, Hoyt Jay Barnes, Sammy Barnett, Tommy Barnette, Roger Dean Beasley, Carroll Beck, Glenn Ray Beck, James Arthur Beck, Thurman Blaine, Trudie Marie Blaine, James Bolden, Terry Lee Browning, Grady Dallas Bryson, Mack C. Bryson, Verlin Leo Bryson, Gordon J. Buchanan, Harold Dempsey Buchanan, Nancy Buc

MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT AMY KAYTHEA NEAL, Appellant, v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 4D21-3124 [February 22, 2023] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; James Nu

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. The appellants (hereafter “Employees”), over 200 former employees of Whitaker Coal Corporation (‘Whitaker”), a mining corporation owned by Sunoco, Inc. (“Sunoco”), brought this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., asserting that Defendants violated their fiduciary duties by represent

Opinion issued July 9, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00587-CV ——————————— LINDSEY NADINE WARNER, Appellant V. TRAVIS NEAL TROUTMAN, Appelle

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-1730 BENJAMIN ADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRISTINA REAGLE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court