Cases

ELLINGTON, Presiding Judge. A Richmond County jury found Michael Brewer guilty on two counts of committing an act of child exploitation through the use of a computer or electronic device, OCGA § 16-12-100.2 (d) (1). Brewer appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial. He contends that the trial court erred in rejecting his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Finding no error, we affirm.

Patrick A. Pirtle, Justice *871The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate. Texas Constitution, Article I, Sec. 15 In its simplest terms, this case involves the issue of whether a trial judge abused his discretion in ordering sanctions against an attorney in a pending civil case. At a more profound level, this case invo

OPINION CLAYTON, JUDGE: This case involves an appeal from a class action certification. Following the Jefferson Circuit Court’s orders granting Appel-lees’ motion for class certification, Nebraska Alliance Realty Company (“NARC”) filed a CR1 23.06 interlocutory appeal. NARC principally claims the trial court erred by failing to make all the

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge Agee wrote the opinion in which Judge Motz and Judge Diaz joined. AGEE, Circuit Judge: The complaint in this case, brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., relates to the DAK Americas LLC Pension Pl

ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION DAVID G. CAMPBELL, United States Magistrate Judge. This case concerns the constitutionality of the State of Arizona’s denial of driver’s licenses to persons commonly known as “DREAMers.”1 On June 15, 2012, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) announced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”) program, which provide

OPINION HARRY PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs are five individual recipients of deferred action under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals' (“DACA”) program, and the Arizona DREAM Act Coalition (“ADAC”), an organization that advances the interests of young immigrants. DACA recipients ' áre noncitizens who were brought to this country as children. Under the DACA program, they are permitted to rem

*979BERZON, Circuit Judge, Concurring in light of the Dissent from the denial of rehearing en Banc: I join the panel opinion in full. I write in concurrence to further explain our holding in light of the dissent from denial of rehearing en banc. I write first to emphasize that the “law” that

Opinion by Judge PREGERSON; Concurrence by Judge CHRISTEN. OPINION PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: The federal government has enacted a program called “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” (“DACA”), which authorizes certain immigrants who came to the United States as children, without permission, to remain in the United States.

ORDER DAVID G. CAMPBELL, District Judge. This case concerns the constitutionality of the State of Arizona’s denial of driver’s licenses to persons commonly known as “DREAMers.”1 On June 15, 2012, Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), announced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”) program, which provides deferred action for

315 F.Supp.2d 295 (2004) James D. BREWER, Plaintiff, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Defendant. No. 02-CV-6153L. United States District Court, W.D. New York. March 31, 2004. *296 James D. Brewer, Woodhill, NY, pro se. Michael C. Driscoll, Hiscock & Barclay LLP, Buffalo, NY, for Plaintiff. DECISION A

Fletcher, Presiding Justice, dissenting in part. Although I reluctantly conclude that the state is now required to prove force in an aggravated sodomy case as a logical extension of our recent decision in State v. Collins,11 disagree with the majority opinion’s unsupported conclusion that there was no evidence of force in this case. Therefore, I dissent.

Opinion GRUENDEL, J. The plaintiff, Hebrew Home and Hospital, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after the granting of the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant James S. Brewer1 on the plaintiffs claim of vexatious litigation. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly determined that the defendant, an attorney, had pr

MARTIN, Chief Judge. Michael L. Martin in his individual capacity, Michael L. Martin, Inc. n/k/a Equity Management, Inc., and Roanoke Land Company, Inc. (“defendants”) appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury’s verdict finding all defendants liable for breach of contract and defendant Michael L. *120Martin, individually, liable for constructive fraud, unfair and dec

77 F.Supp.2d 730 (1999) David LYTLE, Jeanette Lytle, and Joan Maguire, Plaintiffs, v. Charles BREWER, individually and in his official capacity as Lieutenant of the Norfolk Police Department; Charles D. Griffith, Jr., in his official capacity as Norfolk Commonwealth Attorney, and Hon. James S. Gilmore, III, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 2:99cv1366.

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Bradley Scott Gladden died of hypothermia after two police officers, Kenneth Richbourg and Eric Van Imhoff, transported Gladden from a restaurant in North Little Rock, Arkansas, to an isolated off-ramp outside the city. Gladden had asked the officers for a ride to his sister’s house in the next county, but the officers instead left Gladden at the county l

99 P.3d 570 (2004) 209 Ariz. 241 CLEAN ELECTIONS INSTITUTE, INC., an Arizona non-profit corporation; Michael J. Valder; and Lydia Guzman, Plaintiffs/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. Janice BREWER, in her official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Arizona, Defendant/Appellant/Cross-Appellee, No Taxpayer Money for Politicians, an unincorporated association; Eric Crown, in his capacity as chairman of the assoc

73 F.Supp.2d 615 (1999) David LYTLE, Jeanette Lytle, and Joan Maguire, Plaintiffs, v. Charles BREWER, individually and in his official capacity as Lieutenant of the Norfolk Police Department; Charles D. Griffith, Jr., in his official capacity as Norfolk Commonwealth Attorney, and Hon. James S. Gilmore, III, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:99cv1366.

OPINION KELLY, Presiding Judge. ¶ 1 Louis Yanni and other similarly situated homeowners (‘Yanni”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plumbing subcontractors Tucker Plumbing, Inc., and Brewer Enterprises, Inc. (“Subcontractors”). Yanni argues the court erred by concluding Subcontractors were not subject to suit for breach

952 S.W.2d 239 (1997) Michael GIBSON, Narron Gibson and Marianne Gibson, Appellants-Respondents, v. Father Michael BREWER, Respondent-Appellant, and Catholic Chancery—Diocese of Kansas City—St. Joseph, Respondent. No. 79291. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. August 19, 1997. *243 Sylvester James, Jr., Nancy E. Kinner, Brian

MEMORANDUM** Cables and Accessories, Inc. (“Cables”) and its counsel, Sun C. Chen, appeal from the district court’s order denying Cables’ appeal from the bankruptcy court and sanctioning Chen for bringing a frivolous appeal, for making deliberate misrepresentations to the court, and for including in his brief unsubstantiated inflammatory statements against the appellees. We conclude that Cables’ appeal to th