Cases

DISSENT GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. “To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’ ” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570,

512 S.E.2d 458 (1999) Everette B. BARNARD and wife, Diane S. Barnard, Plaintiffs, v. Bobby ROWLAND, d/b/a Bobby Rowland Timber & Logging, Defendant & Third-Party Plaintiff, v. James M. FIFE and wife, Michelle H. Fife, Third-Party Defendants. No. COA97-1411. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 2, 1999. *461 J

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) Barnard Construction Company, Incorporated ) ASBCA Nos. 63387, 63749 ) ) Under Contract No. W912EP-15-C-0021 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Brian R. Dugdale, Esq.

MATHIAS, Judge. Dr. Michael Wartell (“Wartell”), former Chancellor of Indiana University Purdue University Fort Wayne (“IPFW”), filed a complaint in Allen Superior Court against Lawrence Lee (“Lee”), alleging among other claims, defamation per se because Lee sent a private letter to then-Purdue president Dr. France Cordova (“Cordova”) urging her to deny Warte

ORDER PER CURIAM. The Second Injury Fund appeals the Industrial Relations Commission’s ruling allowing the respondent to amend his claim alleging preexisting psychiatric disability, which combined with his compensa-*83ble injury, rendered him permanently and totally disabled. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

[Cite as State v. Barnard, 2020-Ohio-5204.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : Appellate Case No. 2019-CA-27 : v.

WATT, J.: T1 At the behest of Tyson and with the agreement of the poultry growers, we retained this cause to address two questions. The first is whether Tyson is entitled to a new trial under facts where questioning was limited to matters not covered by the jury questionnaire and the answers given in that document were incomplete, untruthful, and/or misleading. The second is a first impression issue: whether poultry growers, hav

The State of TexasAppellee/s Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 29, 2014 Nos. 04-13-00242-CR & 04-13-00243-CR James Michael CHIN, Appellant v.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT Nos. 04-13-00242-CR & 04-13-00243-CR James Michael CHIN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee Fr

The State of TexasAppellee/s Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 29, 2014 Nos. 04-13-00242-CR & 04-13-00243-CR James Michael CHIN, Appellant v.

The State of TexasAppellee/s Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 29, 2014 Nos. 04-13-00242-CR & 04-13-00243-CR James Michael CHIN, Appellant v.

The State of TexasAppellee/s Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 29, 2014 Nos. 04-13-00242-CR & 04-13-00243-CR James Michael CHIN, Appellant v.

Jfourtlj Court of Antonio, October 30. 2013 No. 04-13-00242-CR No. G4-13-00243-CR James Michael Chin. Appellant V. The Slate of

Jfourtlj Court of Antonio, October 30. 2013 No. 04-13-00242-CR No. G4-13-00243-CR James Michael Chin. Appellant V. The Slate of

863 F.Supp. 1498 (1993) Rex BAKER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BARNARD CONSTRUCTION CO. INC., et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 93-140 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. September 15, 1993. *1499 J.E. Gallegos and David Sandoval, Gallegos Law Firm, Santa Fe, NM, for plaintiff. Thomas J. Hynes, Hynes, Hale & Fortner

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BURCIAGA, Chief Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Pioneer Contracting’s (Pioneer) August 31, 1993, motion to sever and for separate trials; Defendant Four-Four, Inc., (Four-Four) September 1, 1993, motion for misjoinder; and Plaintiffs’ February 22, 1994, motion to consolidate. The Court, having reviewed the record, the submissions of the parties,

730 S.W.2d 703 (1987) Harold Amos BARNARD, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 68861. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. April 8, 1987. *707 Allen C. Isbell, Houston, for appellant. Michael J. Guarino, Dist. Atty. and James F. Hury, Jr., Former Dist. Atty. and Jack C. Brock and Miguel Martinez, A

860 F.Supp. 766 (1994) Rex BAKER, Joseph N. Bordelon, Alan Boyd, Charlie E. Bradshaw, Jr., William R. Clarence, Gary Coon, Robert Cornett, Jr., Larry Cunningham, Denny Hensley, Steven D. Hensley, Leonard L. Mahan, Mack D. Mantle, Tracy R. McManus, Eddie Miller, Gerald Miller, David L. Robinson, James D. Spears, Jr. and Dennis Stiles, Plaintiffs, v. BARNARD CONSTRUCTION CO. INC., Davy McKee Corp., Flint Engineering & Construction Co., Four-Fou

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION Nos. 04-13-00242-CR & 04-13-00243-CR James Michael CHIN, Appellant v. The STATE of The STA

'~. ;.\ ` . '(r.. ','~ » '» " \_ r-,` 55,7152»¢© CLERK OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS P.O. BOX 12308,CAPITOL S'I'ATION AUSTIN,TEXAS_ 78711 RECE|VED lN 16,15 APRIL couRT oF cR\MlNAL APPEALs RE: wRIT oF HABEAS coRPUS‘IN¢ TRIAL CAUSE N0.776435-B ` ` APR 20 2015 cLERK, - Abe|Acosta,Clerk Can you please file this rebuttal with writ of habeas corpus application in the above cause number for the court's review. Further can you please inform me if your office has recieved the application and ex