⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “James M. Bartell”

State v. Bartellpublic domain
Superior Court of Delaware · 2023-11-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, : : ID No. 1511001595 v. : : MARK A. BARTELL, : : Defendant. : Submitted: September 13, 2023
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1999-04-13 · Published · cited 0× · 46 F. Supp. 2d 867; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5443; 1999 WL 223305
46 F.Supp.2d 867 (1999) ALLEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. BARTELL INDUSTRIES, INC. and Darragh Company, Defendants. No. J-C-95-143. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division. April 13, 1999. *868 *869 Stephen D. Carver, Carver Patent Law, Ltd., Little Rock, AR,
Bartell v. Bartellpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976-05-25 · Published · cited 26× · 357 A.2d 343; 278 Md. 12; 1976 Md. LEXIS 603
278 Md. 12 (1976) 357 A.2d 343 BARTELL v. BARTELL [No. 124, September Term, 1975.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided May 25, 1976. The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES and LEVINE, JJ. Gary I. Strausberg and Joseph S. Kaufman, with whom was Arnold M. Weiner on the brief, for appel
Bartell v. Zabawapublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2009-06-10 · Published · cited 13× · 2009 MT 204; 351 Mont. 211; 2009 Mont. LEXIS 231; 214 P.3d 735
JUSTICE NELSON, dissenting. ¶55 I dissent. The Court refuses to apply the plain language of M. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and to follow well-established legal principles, and instead creates out of whole cloth a brand new standard of analysis under this Rule. The Court’s approach will only sow confusion in this area of law. While I join Justice Cotter’s dissent, I offer the
United States Tax Court · 2016-08-10 · Published · cited 1× · 147 T.C. No. 5; 147 T.C. 140; 2016 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 21
ESTATE OF GEORGE H. BARTELL, JR. DECEASED, GEORGE DAVID BARTELL AND JEAN LOUISE BARTELL BARBER, CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES AND ESTATE OF ELIZABETH BARTELL, DECEASED, GEORGE DAVID BARTELL AND JEAN LOUISE BARTELL BARBER, CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES, ET AL.,1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
State v. Bartellpublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 1997-03-04 · Published · cited 0× · 286 Mont. 1
On October 10, 1996, it was ordered that the deferred imposition of sentence heretofore entered on October 11, 1995 for the offenses of Burglary, a Felony, Counts I and III, as specified in MCA 45-6-204(1), and Theft, a Felony, Count II, as specified in MCA 45-6-301(l)(a), is revoked. It is further ordered that the defendant be punished by confinement in the Montana State Prison for a term of ten (10) years on Count I, with five (5) years suspended, for a te
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2023-12-13 · Published · cited 0×
12/13/2023 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 28, 2023 Session CAROLYN M. STARK ET AL. v. WILLIAM S. MCLEAN ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Dyer County No. 14-CV-73 Tony Childress, Chancellor _________________________________
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2001-06-12 · Published · cited 12× · 141 F. Supp. 2d 1266; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7550; 85 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1569; 2001 WL 649651
141 F.Supp.2d 1266 (2001) Jennifer ERICKSON, Plaintiff, v. THE BARTELL DRUG COMPANY, Defendant. No. C00-1213L. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. June 12, 2001. *1267 *1268 Lynn Lincoln Sarko, Keller Rohrback, Seattle, WA, Eve C Gartner, Donna Lee, Planned Parenthood Fe
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000-11-07 · Published · cited 27× · 231 F.3d 1104; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 27861; 2000 WL 1664915
BYE, Circuit Judge. James Cantrell sought disability benefits for a mental impairment. The Commissioner denied benefits through all levels of review; Cantrell then pursued judicial review of the Commissioner’s determination in district court. 1 See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We must decide whether the administ
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990-11-27 · Published · cited 55× · 919 F.2d 1317; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20628; 1990 WL 181623
VAN SICKLE, Senior District Judge. James C. Cooper appeals from an order of the district court 1 affirming the decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services to deny Cooper's applications for disability insurance and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001-08-21 · Published · cited 49× · 263 F.3d 1143; 50 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 838; 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4262; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18828; 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,679; 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1002; 2001 WL 984719
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellants Richard Bartell and his wife filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against his former employer, defendant-appellee Aurora Public Schools (“APS”), alleging violations of his due process and equal protection rights, as well as pendent state law claims, stemming from APS’s investigation of sexual harassment charges against Bartell. The distri
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002-09-24 · Published · cited 22× · 305 F.3d 1330; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20207; 2002 WL 31115029
305 F.3d 1330 James T. ROBINSON and Florida Businessmen's Association, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 02-5028. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Decided September 24, 2002. Ted H. Bartelstone, Hollander & Bartelstone, of Miami, FL, argued or plaintiffs-appel
Montana Supreme Court · 2002-06-27 · Published · cited 3× · 2002 MT 145; 49 P.3d 623; 310 Mont. 276; 2002 Mont. LEXIS 246
49 P.3d 623 (2002) 2002 MT 145 Barbara J. BARTELL, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Gordon L. Bartell, deceased, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation, Defendant. No. 01-575. Supreme Court of Montana. Argued and Submitted January 29, 2002. Decided June 27, 2002. Edw
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2025-07-30 · Published · cited 1× · 2025 WY 86
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2025 WY 86 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2025 July 30, 2025 TYLER JAMES HILL, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-24-0252 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). Appeal from the District Court of
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022-06-01 · Published · cited 0×
06/01/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 9, 2021 Session CAROLYN M. STARK ET AL. v. WILLIAM S. MCLEAN ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Dyer County No. 14-CV-73 Tony Childress, Chancellor
New Mexico Supreme Court · 2013-06-27 · Published · cited 1× · 4 N.M. 402; 2013 NMSC 029
OPINION MAES, Chief Justice. This appeal stems from the termination of Rio Rancho’s City Manager, James Palenick (Palenick), and requires us to address the narrow issue of whether Palenick is estopped from pursuing a breach of contract claim against the City of Rio Rancho (the City) based on an alleged violation of the
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012-02-06 · Published · cited 0× · 1 N.M. Ct. App. 274; 2012 NMCA 018
OPINION SUTIN, Judge. {1} After the City of Rio Rancho (the City) was informed by the New Mexico Attorney General that its termination of Plaintiff James Palenick as its City Manager violated the Open Meetings Act (the Act), NMSA 1978, §§ 10-15-1 to -4 (1974, as amended through 2009), the City, in a meeting eleven months after the termination, passed a resolution attemp
Bozgoz v. Jamespublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-08-14 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) MARGARET BOZGOZ, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 19-0239 (ABJ) ) VONCELLE JAMES, ) Su
James Edward Rogerspublic domain
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015-03-27 · Published · cited 2× · 2015 WY 48; 346 P.3d 934; 2015 Wyo. LEXIS 54; 2015 WL 1393418
HILL, Justice. [¶1] A jury convicted James Rogers of first-degree sexual assault and two counts of third-degree sexual abuse of a minor. Mr. Rogers qualified as a habitual criminal and was thus sentenced to life in prison on the first-degree sexual assault conviction. He received thirteen- to fifteen-year sentences on the remaining two charges to be served concurrently to each oth
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2001-08-31 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-00-00054-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ___________________________________________________________________ JAMES ANTHONY WAYNE , Appellant,