Cases

Justice BEATTY. This case arises out of the involuntary commitment of Martha Lewin Argoe (Appellant) to Three Rivers Behavioral Health, L.L.C., a psychiatric, inpatient facility that was subse*466quently purchased by Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.1 (Respondent). Appellant appeals the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of

388 S.C. 394 (2010) 697 S.E.2d 551 Martha Lewin ARGOE, Appellant, v. THREE RIVERS BEHAVIORAL CENTER AND PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS, Its Successor; Phyllis Bryant-Mobley, MD; Glenn Hooker, MD; Aiken Regional Medical Center, Aurora Pavilion; David A. Steiner, MD; Cheryl C. Dodds, MD; Doris Ann Burrell, RN; Carolina Care Plan; James F. Walsh, Jr.; G. Lewis Argoe, Jr.; and George L. Argoe, III, Defendants, Of Whom James F. Wals

LOCKEMY, C.J.: In this medical malpractice action, Martha Lewin Argoe asserts the circuit court erred in granting all respondents partial summary judgment. We affirm. *461FACTS Our supreme court detailed the facts of this case in its decision in Argoe v. Three Rivers Behavioral Health, LLC (Argoe II), 392 S.C. 462, 710 S.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES 0. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Roscoe Woods’ Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint, filed October 16, 2015 (Doc. 29)(“Woods Motion”); (ii) the Racing Commission Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, filed October 28, 2015 (Doc. 31)(“Commission Motion”); and (iii) the Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to D

191 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2002) HOUSEHOLD BANK, f.s.b., Plaintiff, v. JFS GROUP, et al., Defendants, H & R Block, et al., Plaintiffs/Intervenors. No. CIV.A. 01A1405N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 8, 2002. *1293 *1294 Stewart M. Cox, Andrew J. Noble, II

316 S.W.3d 715 (2010) Raul NAVARRO, Doris Navarro, Virgina B. Abney, Alabama Coushatta Tribe of Texas (A Federally Recognized Indian Tribe), Amarillo Financial Freedom I, LP, Amarillo Financial Freedom, Inc., Americo Acosta, Marquita Adamson, John H. and Dorothy P. Alexander, Raquel Avalos, John G. Alvarado, James R. Bailey, Bill J. and Betty L. Barker, Billy Barnes, Harvey A. and Babara S. Baycroft, Charles L. and Margaret D. Bechtold, Deborah A. Bench,

392 S.C. 462 (2011) 710 S.E.2d 67 Martha Lewin ARGOE, Appellant, v. THREE RIVERS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, L.L.C., Psychiatric Solutions, Inc., Phyllis Bryant-Mobley, MD, Glenn Hooker, MD, Aiken Regional Medical Center, Aurora Pavilion, David Steiner, MD, Cheryl C. Dodds, MD, Doris Ann Burrell, RN, Carolina Care Plan, James F. Walsh, Jr., G. Lewis Argoe, Jr. and George L. Argoe, III, Defendants, Of whom Psychiatric Solutions

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant United States of America’s Motion and Memorandum to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Errata Amended and Consolidated Complaint [Doc. No. 118] Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, filed February 23, 2012 (

965 F.2d 678 75 Ed. Law Rep. 777 John MASSEY, Homer B. Sewell, Eunice Lieurance, Donald L.Esslinger, Kendall E. Anderson, Richard Atkinson, Donald W.Bailey, David E. Baker, Betty Ann Barnett, Bruce E. Beck,Linda S. Benedict, Roger Bennett, Robert J. Bevins, AlbertTice Black, Roy Blassingame, Rebecca Blocker, LindaGlumenberg, Kenneth A. Bolte, Gerald A. Boschert, Martha M.Bowen, Paul Brautigam, Jo

269 F.Supp.2d 878 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, v. Robert N. ANGLETON, Defendant. No. CR. H-02-0040. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. June 10, 2003. *881 Michael Wayne Ramsey, Houston, TX, for Robert Nicholas Angleton, defendant. Edward F Gallagher, Terry Clark, Melissa Annis, U.S. Attorneys O

220 B.R. 932 (1998) In re BEST RECEPTION SYSTEMS, INC., Debtor. BENEFICIAL NATIONAL BANK USA, Plaintiff, v. BEST RECEPTIONS SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants (5 Cases). Geneva JOHNSON, Joel Stephenson, Plaintiffs, v. RICKLES ELECTRONICS & SATELLITES, et al., Defendants. Donald HICKS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SKY-LINK CABLE, INC., et al., Defendants. Sykes POTTER, Plaintiff, v. STAR VISION, INC., Defendant. Ma

Affirmed and Opinion filed June 29, 2010 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

519 So.2d 652 (1988) George E. ROLLINS, Margaret Rollins, Elizabeth Rollins, Kenneth Lenard Rollins, et al., Rayfield Rollins, et al., Annaleese T. Mobley, Nathaniel Oliff and George L. Rollins, As Trustees of the New Hope Church of God Deliverance, Inc., Appellants, v. J.D. ODOM, Jr., and Vernie Odom, His Wife, Appellees. Nos. BR-442 to BR-444. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.<

900 F.Supp. 272 (1995) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., Alease Sims, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. The STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. CV 83-M-1676. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. August 1, 1995. Order Granting in Part Motions to Alter or

04/08/2020 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE July 24, 2019 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TYSHON BOOKER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 108568 G. Scott Green, Judge __________________________

CONSENT JUDGMENT GADOLA, District Judge. This matter having come before the Court upon the stipulation of the parties to the entry of a Consent Judgment finally and fully resolving all of the remaining claims in this action; and It appearing to the Court that this action, initially commenced some twenty-two years ago, involves claims of discrimination based upon gender in hi

Roe, C.J. This cause coming on to be heard on the joint stipulation of the parties hereto, the Court being fully advised in the premises, finds; That the multiple-party group of Claimants listed herein consists of 540 Claimants seeking individual judgments of varying amounts. These claims, in the aggregate amount of five hundred ninety thousand six hundred thirty-four do

256 B.R. 377 (2000) In re AMERICAN FAMILY ENTERPRISES, a Delaware general partnership, et al., Debtors and Debtors-in-Possession. No. 99-41774(RG). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. September 11, 2000. *378 *379 *380 *381

25 F.3d 1194 40 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 750 UNITED STATES of Americav.Robert Joseph CARR, Jr., Appellant in No. 93-1376.UNITED STATES of Americav.Walter Orlando CARDONA-USQUIANO, Appellant in No. 93-1383. Nos. 93-1376, 93-1383. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Feb. 14, 1994.Decided June 3, 1994.Sur

ARNOLD, Judge. The scope of judicial review for decisions made by a board sitting as a quasi-judicial body involves: (1) Reviewing the record for errors in law, (2) Insuring that procedures specified by law in both statute and ordinance are followed, (3) Insuring that appropriate due process rights of a petitioner are protecte