Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) RODNEY BRADSHAW, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1422 (PLF) ) THOMAS J. VILSACK,

MAYNARD, Justice, dissenting. (Filed Dec. 12, 2001) The majority decision in this case violates both the settled law of this Court and the principles of sound reasoning. The doctrine of stare decisis mandates that we follow this Court’s unanimous opinion in Miller v. Romero, 186 W.Va. 523, 413 S.E.2d 178 (1991), in deciding this case. Stare deci-sis

NO. 07-10-00434-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D ----------------------------------------------------

NO. 07-10-00434-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D JULY 17, 2012 CHARLES CALVIN MOORE, ET AL, APPELLANTS v. NOBLE ENERGY, INC., ET AL, DAISY MOORE A

220 F.3d 898 (8th Cir. 2000) FIREFIGHTERS' INSTITUTE FOR RACIAL EQUALITY, BY AND THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN; ROBERT ANDERSON; CHARLES BATES; DONALD CHAMBERS; MICHAEL COLEMAN; ERIC DRIVER; KENNETH GREEN; LEROY HARRIS; LONNIE R. HUGHES; STANLEY JOHNSON; JOSEPH JONES; JOHN LESTER; RONALD LOGAN; JAMES MORGAN; MICHAEL PICKETT; ZEFPRO REDDING; GARY RUFFIN; LAWRENCE SAYLES; ADDINGTON STEWART; NATHANIAL SUTHERLAND; LLOYD TATE; GILBERT VAUGHN; DERRICK WEBSTER; DA

ORDER PRATT, District Judge. After four years of litigation, the parties in this case ask the Court to certify this action as a class action, and approve as fair, reasonable, and adequate their settlement agreement. Additionally, the Defendant seeks an order dismissing this lawsuit with prejudice and on the merits. Finally, counsel for the Plaintiffs seek approval of their attorneys’ fee application. For

FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge. H. Wesley Robinson, Irwin W. Milliken, and Leo W. Wilson appeal from a final judgment entered by the district court 1 on a jury verdict finding them each guilty of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Robinson and Wilson were fo

281 F.Supp.2d 786 (2003) In re DUKE ENERGY ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates To: All Actions No. 3:02CV291-MU. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. June 23, 2003. *787 *788 Geraldine Sumter, Ferguson, Stein, Chambers, Adkins, Gresham & Sumter, Charlotte,

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED MAY SESSION, 1998 December 30, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) Appellate Court Clerk C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9702-CR-00066 ) Appellee, )

254 S.W.2d 865 (1953) BRADSHAW et al. v. PARKMAN et al. No. 3059. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Waco. January 8, 1953. Rehearing Denied February 13, 1953. *866 Orville M. Jobe and James T. Mixson, Waco, H. L. Williford, Fairfield, Ellen Victery, Teague, Dalton & Moore, Dallas, Carl Cannon, Groesbeck, for a

94 F.2d 788 (1938) EASTUS, U. S. Atty., et al. v. BRADSHAW.[*] No. 8550. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 24, 1938. Earl C. Crouter, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and James L. Backstrom, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Joe H. Jones, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Dallas, Tex., for appellants. W. B. Harrell and Russell Allen, both

Madsen, J. ¶1 In executing a search warrant for a suspected methamphetamine lab on premises owned by petitioner Leo C. Brutsche, law enforcement officers using a battering ram to gain entry caused physical damage to doors and doorjambs. Mr. Brutsche brought suit against the city of Kent (City), among others, arguing that the officers had a duty to conduct the search so as to avoid unnecessary damage and do the least damage to the

GUIDRY, J. | ¡.The defendant, Wendell Wesley, was charged by grand jury indictment with one count of second degree murder, a violation of La. R.S. 14:30.1, and pled not guilty. Prior to trial, he moved to suppress his second tape-recorded interview. Following a hearing, the trial court denied the motion to suppress, and the defendant applied to this court for supervisory relief concerning the ruling, but the writ application

OPINION JAMES T. CAMPBELL, Justice. This case requires our construction of a royalty interest reserved in a 1955 deed conveying land in Wheeler County. The trial court granted summary judgment for appellees Noble Energy, Inc., et al. Appellants Charles Calvin Moore, et al., appeal. We will affirm the trial court. Background By a warranty deed dated

345 F.Supp. 1188 (1972) Richard H. BEATTY et al., Plaintiffs, v. H. Dale BRIGHT et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 8-2313-C-1. United States District Court, S. D. Iowa, C. D. July 21, 1972. Ralph R. Randall, Richard H. Beatty, D. J. Fairgrave, Bradshaw, Fowler, Proctor & Fairgrave, Eugene Davis, Duncan, Jones, Riley & Davis, Des Moines, Iowa, for plaintiffs. <

505 P.2d 1251 (1973) 84 N.M. 575 John L. OTERO, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Otero, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jack BURGESS, Mel Vigil, James Trent, Jack H. Graves and Norman Holton and Leo Bradshaw, Defendants-Appellees. No. 924. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. January 5, 1973. Certiorari Denied February 6, 1973.

REID, Associate Judge: The government concedes that during the first phase of police interrogation of appellant, James A. Dorsey, “the police violated the prophylactic rule articulated in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981)” by not stopping the interrogation when Mr. Dorsey invoked his right to coun

51 F.Supp. 470 (1943) METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO. v. SKOV et al. No. 940. District Court, D. Oregon. July 12, 1943. *471 *472 Robert R. Rankin, of Portland, Or., for plaintiff. Leo Levenson, of Portland, Or., for Skov. Robert Bradshaw, of Portland, Or., for Halley. R. F. Do

410 S.E.2d 490 (1991) 330 N.C. 390 Norman W. SWANSON, Henry F. Murray, Carl L. Whitney, William E. Nicholson, III, Charles A. Dancy, Melvin F. Eyerman, Ira N. Schwarz, John L. Powell, Jr., Galina Elworth, Donald V. Wallace, William E. Denton, Robert A. *491 Nisbet, Walter J. Bartnikowski, Ralph P. Hunt, Marion B. Zollicoffer, William H. Talbert, Billy Clark, Wallace M. Davis, Grady L. Strange,

ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, District Judge. Before the Court are two Motions for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendants, Bristol, Inc. d/b/a Emerson Process Management and/or d/b/a Remote Automated Solutions, 'Inc. (“Emerson”), Irene Bielen (“Bielen”), and Craig Rossman (“Rossman”) (collectively “Defendants”). Also before the Court is a Motion to Amend or Substitute Response (“Motion to Amend”), filed by