Cases

PER CURIAM: In this case, which is not a class action, the plaintiffs, nearly 100 individuals, appeal the district court’s dismissal of their complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as well as the court’s denial of their subsequent Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. The complaint, which sought damages for personal injury and wrongful death resulting from exposure to asbestos, alleged that the court had di

875 F.Supp. 1342 (1995) Marvin KLEHR and Mary Klehr, Plaintiffs, v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION and A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., Jointly and Severally, Defendants. Civ. No. 3-94-424. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division. January 6, 1995. *1343 *1344 James R. Koby, Par

170 Wis.2d 622 (1992) 489 N.W.2d 697 John CHITWOOD, and Barbara Chitwood, Plaintiffs-Respondents,[†] v. A.O. SMITH HARVESTORE PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant, A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, Dodgeland Harvestore, Edward Bartolemei, Robert Carl Shoemaker, Maryland Casualty, and Tower Insurance Company, Inc., Defendants. No. 90-0292. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.</

III. DISCUSSION A. Equitable Estoppel and Whether a Non-Signatory May Compel Arbitration A non-signatory to an arbitration agreement may bind a signatory to that agreement in certain circumstances under the theory of equitable estoppel. See, e.g., Dwayne E. Williams, Binding Nonsignatories to Arbitration Agreements, 25-SPG FRANCHISE L.J. 175, 178 (2006) ("Equitable estoppe

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

10/25/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 5, 2024 Session JAMES L. DAVISON ET AL. v. JEREMY HOWARD JOHNSON ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Rutherford County No. 22CV-373 Bonita Jo Atwood, Judge ___________________________________

USCA11 Case: 20-12393 Date Filed: 11/16/2021 Page: 1 of 31 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-12393 ____________________ ETHAN JAMES CHARLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JEF

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS JAMES SMITH § § Petitioner § § PD-0405-15 VS § § THE STATE OF TEXAS § § Appellee

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0115p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JAMES H. SMITH, ┐ Petitioner-Appellant, │ │

Judgment rendered March 5, 2025. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 56,185-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF

PD-0405-15 May 15, 2015 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS JAMES SMITH § § Petitioner § § PD-0405-15 VS §

USCA11 Case: 20-13301 Date Filed: 04/28/2022 Page: 1 of 18 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-13301 ____________________ JAMES RUSSELL JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant, versus STATE OF FLORIDA,

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-23-00746-CR James Charles Johnson, II, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 22DCR86064, THE HONORABLE STEVEN J. DUSKIE, JUDGE PRESIDING ME MO RAN DU M O PI N I O

05/25/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 15, 2022 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES RODNEY SMITH Appeal from the Circuit Court for Houston County No. 2015-CR-86 Suzanne Lockert-Mash, Judge ___________________________________

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON MOTION FOR REHEARING NO. 03-11-00270-CV

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON MOTION FOR REHEARING NO. 03-11-00270-CV Jeffrey A. Fox, Appellant v. James F. O’Leary, Jr., Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-10-002394, HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESI

744 F.Supp.2d 870 (2010) FAIL-SAFE, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, Defendant. Case No. 08-CV-310. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. December 23, 2010. *872 George Stephen Long, Nicole A. Westbrook, Reid A. Page, Gretchen E. Lipman, Cash K. Parker, Polsinelli Shughart PC, Denver, CO, John R. Schreiber, P

PHILIP P. SIMON, JUDGE In this certified class action, the plaintiff class alleges that a dunning letter sent by defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC was false, misleading or confusing in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment, putting before me the question whether the claim can be decided as a matter of law based on undisputed facts, without a trial. Neith

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals granting the motion of appellee, Madison Correctional Institution Warden Rod B. Johnson, and dismissing the petition of appellant, James Smith, for a writ of habeas corpus. Smith’s claims of a speedy-trial violation and a defective jury-verdict form are not cognizable

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. JAMES CLAYTON JOHNSON, Appellant. No. CR-16-0261-AP Filed August 13, 2019 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honorable M. Scott