Cases

293 B.R. 99 (2003) In re James J. FARRELL, III, Debtor. James J. Farrell, III, Plaintiff, v. Sperry Decew and Richard Burke, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 94-50544. Adversary No. 02-05049. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut. April 17, 2003. James J. Farrell, Norwalk, CT, pro se. Heather Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Hartford, CT, for Burke.

O'Brien, J. *351 James Farris, plaintiff's father and acting as plaintiff's next friend, appeals as of right the trial court's order granting defendant's motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(7). We affirm. In 2010, defendant was appointed as plaintiff's law

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS. STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: In 1982 the Maritime Subsidy Board issued a grant of authority to United States Lines to conduct around-the-world shipping service with unsubsidized ships. It did so in a manner that effectively denied U.S. Lines’s competitors, including Waterman Stea

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-4488 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JAMES MICHAEL FARRELL, Defendant – Appellant. ------------------------------ NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS, Amicus

DAVIS, Justice: This matter involves two consolidated petitions for writs of prohibition filed under the original jurisdiction of this Court. The petition filed in Case No. 13-0086 was brought by the defendants in seven consolidated eases pending before the Circuit Court of Mason County; 1 and the petition in Case No. 1

Fisher, Associate Judge: Almost simultaneously on August 7, 1998, al Qaeda terrorists detonated powerful truck bombs outside the United States embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya, killing over two hundred people and injuring more than a thousand others. Owens v. Republic of Sudan ,

The defendant, James M. Farrell, was charged with operating while under the influence of alcohol, see G. L. c. 90, § 24(1)(a )(1), and negligent operation of a motor vehicle, see G. L. c. 90, § 24(2)(a ). After a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of negligent operation of a motor vehicle. On appeal, he argues that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the conviction. We affirm. Discussion. 1. Sufficie

ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6945 JAMES G. BLAKELY, a/k/a Jimmy G. Blakely, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ROBERT WARDS, Regional Director; MR. DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel Attorney; A. PADULA, Warden; M. BELL, Associate Warden; MAJOR DEAN; NURSE MACDONALD, Head Nurse at Lee

FARRELL, Associate Judge, dissenting: Although some fireworks may legally be possessed in the District of Columbia, a great many others — including any that “explode,” 12H DCMR § F-3309.1.1.1.2 (2006) — may not. The trial judge found that “multiple boxes” of fireworks lay in the rear interior of the SUV within arm’s reach of T.H., who admitted knowing they *916

646 A.2d 963 (1994) Leroy FARRELL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 92-CO-1065. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued August 4, 1994. Decided August 17, 1994. *964 Laurie B. Davis, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein and Sandra K. Levick, Public Defender Service, were on the brief, fo

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. James W. Farrell has submitted an affidavit dated July 24, 1991, wherein he tenders his resignation as an attorney and counselor-at-law (22 NYCRR 691.9). Mr. Farrell was admitted to the practice of law by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department, on October 18, 1961, under the name James William Farrell. Mr. Farrell acknow

Janet Marie Ferrell* was convicted of first degree robbery and was sentenced to serve 20 years in the penitentiary. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed her conviction and sentence with an unpublished memorandum opinion. We granted certiorari review to address whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred by affirming the judgment of the trial court on any of three grounds raised in Janet's petition for certiorari:

OPINION WYNN, Circuit Judge: With the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, Congress sought to reduce the number of frivolous lawsuits flooding the federal courts. Congress did so in part by enacting 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), a “three-strikes” statute providing that if a prisoner has had three prior cases dismissed

FARRELL, Senior Judge: Appellants collectively were indicted for a series of violent crimes and related other offenses arising from what the government alleged was a conspiracy to retaliate against a rival “crew” or street gang primarily for the shooting death of William “Boo” Foster, a leader of the so-called Todd Place Crew (or “TPC”) of which appellants were members.

64 P.3d 304 (2002) 138 Idaho 378 Patrick J. FARRELL, Jr. and Kathleen D. Farrell, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF LEMHI COUNTY, Idaho, governing body of a political subdivision of the State of Idaho; Fraser M. Madill; James B. Madill; Elizabeth Susan Madill Jones; Mary Anne Madill; Margaret J. Madill; Patrick Madill; Paula Mentzer; Mary M. Madill, Defendants-Appellants, and Wayne

OPINION OF THE COURT Herbert Rosenberg, J. At the trial of defendant on a charge of violating section 1180 (d) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, defendant moved to exclude certain exhibits offered by the People and the court reserved decision as to the motion and as to the verdict. This is now a decision on the motion and a verdict. Defendant was charged with operating his automobile at a

BISHOP, J. The plaintiffs, Mary Beth Farrell and Vincent Farrell, 1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered following a jury trial, in favor of the defendants Brian J. Hines, M.D., and Urogynecology and Pelvic Surgery, LLC (Urogynecology).

OPINION OF THE COURT Main, J. Defendant was indicted on October 29, 1982 and charged with criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, in violation of Penal Law § 220.39 (1), and with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, in violation of Penal Law § 220.16 (1). He was arraigned on the charges on November 1, 1982, at which time he was represented by a Public Defend

THOMPSON, C.J. R.H. appeals his adjudications of delinquency and his disposition. We affirm. R.H. contends that in case number 98-1546 he was entitled to resist arrest because the arresting officers did not have probable cause to arrest him. This issue is without merit because the arresting officer testified repeatedly that he had checked and found multiple outstanding arrest warrants for R.H.

718 A.2d 1083 (1998) Troy P. JAMES, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. Nos. 94-CF-1555, 96-CO-1792. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued February 3, 1998. Decided October 8, 1998. *1085 John Thomas Kenney, appointed by the Court, for appellant. Danny C. Onorato, Assistant United States Attorne