⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “James Goodrum”

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017-07-25 · Published · cited 0×
07/25/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 18, 2017 Session MICHAEL GOODRUM v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 20549 Robert L. Jones, Judge No. M2016-00684-CCA-R3-PC The petitioner,
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2017-07-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 11, 2016 Session TERRY JUSTIN VAUGHN v. CITY OF TULLAHOMA, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Coffee County No. 42013 Vanessa A. Jackson, Judge ___________________________________ No. M2015-02441-COA-R3-CV – Filed July 21, 2017 _____________________________
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995-04-27 · Published · cited 0× · 53 F.3d 338; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22764; 1995 WL 247162
53 F.3d 338NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James Basil GOODRUM, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Robert G. BORG, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15000. United States C
State v. Goodrumpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995-09-26 · Published · cited 18× · 39 Conn. App. 526; 665 A.2d 159; 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 427
LAVERY, J. The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of possession of narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (b),1 conspiracy to sell narcotics in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 (a)2 and 21a-278 (b), possession of marijuana in violation of Gene
People v. Goodrumpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1991-03-11 · Published · cited 13× · 228 Cal. App. 3d 397; 279 Cal. Rptr. 120; 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1823; 91 Daily Journal DAR 2894; 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 198
228 Cal.App.3d 397 (1991) 279 Cal. Rptr. 120 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAMES BASIL GOODRUM, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. D011471. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. March 11, 1991. *399 COUNSEL Edward C. Schwer for Defendant and Appellant. Joh
State v. Goodrumpublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995-11-06 · Published · cited 0× · 235 Conn. 929; 667 A.2d 554; 1995 Conn. LEXIS 421
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 39 Conn. App. 526 (AC 12615), is denied.
State v. Goodrumpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989-10-03 · Published · cited 7× · 449 N.W.2d 41; 152 Wis. 2d 540; 1989 Wisc. App. LEXIS 969
152 Wis.2d 540 (1989) 449 N.W.2d 41 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jamie L. GOODRUM, Defendant-Appellant.[†] No. 89-0256-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs September 11, 1989. Decided October 3, 1989. *543 For defendant-appellant there were brie
Goodrum v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1985-10-31 · Published · cited 1× · 700 S.W.2d 630; 1985 Tex. App. LEXIS 12305
OPINION JUNELL, Justice. Randy Edward Goodrum appeals convictions for forgery and burglary. After the jury rendered guilty verdicts, the court assessed punishment at 15 years imprisonment on each offense. Appellant brings four grounds of error: (1) the evidence of forgery was insufficient to show appellant possessed the requisite intent to harm or defraud, (2) the evidence was insufficient to establish ap
Goodrum v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982-08-24 · Published · cited 10× · 418 So. 2d 942
Goodrum appeals from an order of the District Court of Mobile County revoking his probation. Direct appeal from a District Court to this court is permitted pursuant to Alabama Code §12-12-72 (1975), provided certain conditions are met. Section12-12-72 reads as follows: "Appeals shall be directly to the appropriate appellate court if: (1) An adequate record or stipulation of the facts is available
State v. Goodrumpublic domain
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983-01-26 · Published · cited 3× · 123 N.H. 77; 455 A.2d 1067; 1983 N.H. LEXIS 227
Per curiam. The factual setting of this case presents us with the legal question of when a bump, shove, or push becomes force sufficient to constitute robbery, as opposed to the lesser-included offense of theft. We affirm the defendant’s conviction of robbery. Thirteen-year-old Mark Crueger was on his paper route in Nashua. In order to check his customer list, Mark placed his money bag on top of his bag of pa
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992-10-20 · Published · cited 0× · 841 S.W.2d 274; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1616; 1992 WL 293018
FENNER, Presiding Judge. Calvin and Mary Goodrum appeal an order of the trial court granting a Motion for Summary Judgment favorable to Kansas City Power and Light (KCP & L) in their action seeking to recover damages for the wrongful death of their son, Benjamin Goodrum. Benjamin died of a heatstroke allegedly brought on while he was engaged in tree-trimming work pursuant to his employment with Asplundh Tree Expert Compa
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992-01-28 · Published · cited 45× · 824 S.W.2d 6; 1992 Mo. LEXIS 9; 1992 WL 12575
824 S.W.2d 6 (1992) Calvin and Mary GOODRUM, Appellants, v. ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT COMPANY, Respondent. No. 73836. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. January 28, 1992. *7 William H. Pickett, David T. Greis, Kansas City, for appellants. James W. Benjamin, Barbara F. Corbin, Kansas City, for respondent. Jack W.R. Headl
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-06-09 · Published · cited 73× · 824 F.3d 1188; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10437; 2016 WL 3201489
OPINION WATFORD, Circuit Judge: Tony Goodrum is a California state prisoner serving a 21-year sentence for voluntary manslaughter. The district court denied his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court held that Goodrum’s petition constituted a “second or successive” petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b), and that he failed to
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008-11-05 · Published · cited 1× · 584 F. Supp. 2d 1026; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109346; 2008 WL 4793814
(2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Wayne Andre GOODRUM, Defendant. Nos. 5:07 CV 2682, 5:01 CR 0259. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. November 5, 2008. MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2255 LESLEY WELLS, District Jud
Goodrum v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004-09-01 · Published · cited 6× · 604 S.E.2d 251; 269 Ga. App. 397; 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2917; 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 1175
604 S.E.2d 251 (2004) 269 Ga. App. 397 GOODRUM v. The STATE. No. A04A1420. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 1, 2004. *252 Thomas J. Killeen, Athens, for appellant. Kenneth W. Mauldin, District Attorney, Brian V. Patterson, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. PHIPPS, Judge.
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2009-01-21 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 07-08-0129-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A JANUARY 21, 2009 ______________________________ ANDREW RUSSELL GOODRUM, APPELLANT v. THE
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2009-01-21 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 07-08-0129-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A JANUARY 21, 2009 ______________________________ ANDREW RUSSELL GOODRUM, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE 46TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILBARGER COUNTY
Rosson v. Goodrumpublic domain
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1969-04-25 · Published · cited 0× · 253 La. 1084; 221 So. 2d 518; 1969 La. LEXIS 2934
In re: James E. Goodrum and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Madison. 219 So.2d 802. The application is denied. According to the facts, as found to be by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of. BARHAM, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted. I am d
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2009-01-21 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 07-08-0129-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A JANUARY 21, 2009 ______________________________ ANDREW RUSSEL
Rosson v. Goodrumpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969-02-05 · Published · cited 0× · 219 So. 2d 802
PRICE, Judge. These tort actions arose out of a vehicular collision happening on July 26, 1966, on U.S. Highway 80, approximately ten miles east of Tallulah, Louisiana. On this date, at about 10:00 o’clock in the morning, Mr. and Mrs. Claude Rosson and their two minor daughters were traveling west on U.S. Highway 80. An autO' driven by James E. Goodrum was approaching the Rosson car from the opposite direction. The highway d