Cases

OPINION CHARLES KREGER, Justice. Jeremy Lee Conlin appeals an order denying his motion for appointment of counsel for the purpose of filing a motion for forensic DNA testing. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.01(c) (Vernon 2006). At the Court’s request, the parties submitted briefs on issues of appellate jurisdiction. After reviewing those responses and the clerk’s record, we hold that the notic

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (64 AD2d 921). Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO.

OPINION EATON, Judge: Plaintiff 1 seeks judicial review of the United States Department of Agriculture’s (“Agriculture,” or the “Department”) denial of its application for cash benefits under the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers (“TAA”) program. 19 U.S.C. § 2401e (2002); Pl.’s R. 5

M. J. KELLY, J. In this dispute over the validity of a consulting agreement, plaintiff, Jaime Pransky, appeals by right the trial court’s opinion and order dismissing her claims against defendant, Falcon Group, Inc., under MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (10). 1 She argues the trial court erred when it determined that the consulting agre

Lewis, J., Defendant has appealed to us from a summary conviction for disorderly conduct. On January 29, 1954, a warrant was issued for the arrest of defendant, charging disorderly conduct by wilfully making or causing to made, loud, boisterous and unseemly noises to the annoyance of the peaceable residents nearby whereby the public peace was broken and disturbed, by firing high-powered rifles and shotguns wi

805 P.2d 189 (1991) LMV LEASING, INC., Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Val CONLIN, Barbara Conlin, Tubber T. Okuda, Mary Y. Okuda, and Roy W. Mallory, Defendants and Appellants. No. 890504-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. January 16, 1991. *190 Val J. Conlin and Barbara Conlin (argued), Henderson, Nev., pro se. Steven W. Call (arg

Thomas A. Varlan, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on defendant's two pending dispositive motions: one for summary judgment on the issue of general causation [Doc. 237], and one for judgment on the pleadings with respect to plaintiffs' strict liability claims [Doc. 251]. Plaintiffs oppose both motions [Doc. 253 (summary judgment); Doc. 254 (judgment on the pleadings) ]. Defendant replied for the s

566 F.3d 672 (2009) James H. LIMBRIGHT and Henry J. Limbright, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. George S. HOFMEISTER, Kay R. Hofmeister, and Douglas Q. Holmes, as Trustee for the George S. Hofmeister Family Trust f/b/o Megan G. Hofmeister; Douglas Q. Holmes, as Trustee for the George S. Hofmeister Family Trust f/b/o Scott R. Hofmeister; Douglas Q. Holmes, as Trustee for the George S. Hofmeister Family Trust f/b/o Jamie S. Hofmeister, Defendants-Appellant

NO. 07-09-0115-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A SEPTEMBER 16, 2009 ______________________________

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0185p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - JAMES H. LIMBRIGHT and HENRY J. Plaintiff

49 N.Y.2d 713 (1980) In the Matter of Daniel F. Conlin, as President of Local Union 891, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, on Behalf of Himself and All School Custodian and School Custodian-Engineer Members of Said Union, Appellant, v. Stephen R. Aiello et al., Constituting the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New Yo

(2008) James H. LIMBRIGHT and Henry J. Limbright, Judgment Plaintiffs, v. George HOFMEISTER and Kay Ramsay Hofmeister, Judgment Defendants, Douglas Q. Holmes as Trustee of the George S. Hofmeister Family Trust f/b/o Megan G. Hofmeister, Douglas Q. Holmes as Trustee of the George S. Hofmeister Family Trust f/b/o Scott R. Hofmeister, and Douglas Q. Holmes as Trustee of the George S. Hofmeister Family Trust f/b/o Jamie S. Hofmeister, Supplementa

20 B.R. 145 (1982) In re Troy Lee JAMES, Debtor. In re McDavid HATHORN, Debtor. In re Marilyn BLACKSHER, Debtor. In the Matter of Rebecca R. BROWN, Debtor. FEDERAL LAND BANK OF ST. PAUL, Plaintiff, v. Rebecca R. BROWN, Defendant. Bankruptcy Nos. 81-04754-G, 81-04163-G, 81-06484-G and 81-07213-G, Adv. No. 82-0172. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D.

528 F.Supp. 68 (1981) Cherie PAPACODA, Plaintiff, By Her Next Friend Patricia Conlin v. STATE of Connecticut, et al. Civ. A. No. H-80-630. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. May 22, 1981. James D. Reardon, Gould, Larson, Reardon, Carr & Stanley, Old Saybrook, Conn., for plaintiff. *69 Thomas N. Sullivan and

Opinion FLYNN, J. The defendant, Arthur Gainey, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-71 (a) (1) and risk of injury *157to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21.1 The defendant also pleaded nol

VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge: Following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, Walter R. Conlin was convicted on eight counts of willfully preparing false and fraudulent Federal income tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2). He was also convicted of destroying tax returns filed with the Small Business Administration (18 U.

Opinion DRANGINIS, J. The defendant, Mariano Arluk, appeals from the judgments of conviction,1 rendered after a jury trial, of one count each of assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-61 (a) (l),2 reckless endangerment in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-63 (a),3 c

PER CURIAM: Arthur G. Strissel, Jr., is the former Executive Director of the Housing Authority of the City of Annapolis, Maryland. As part of Strissel’s responsibilities in that position, he distributed funds provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) for public housing projects. One of the federal grant programs administered by Strissel was the Mod

PER CURIAM: This is an appeal from an order of the Federal Communications Commission refusing to consolidate for hearing with competing applications the standard broadcast application of James River Broadcasting Corp., and returning the application as unacceptable. We hold that the Commission has not acted in conformance with its own rules, and accordingly remand the case for further consideration in the light of those rules.<