Cases

OPINION *Page 2 {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Donald Murphy appeals from the February 12, 2007, and February 15, 2007, Judgment Entries of the Stark County Court of Common Pleas, Family Court Division. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE {¶ 2} Appellant Donald Murphy and appellee Charlotte Murphy were married on

843 F.2d 1385 Dawley (William James)v.Murphy (Edward) NO. 87-1802 United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. MAR 17, 1988 1 Appeal From: D.Mass. 2 AFFIRMED.

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. The Department of Labor (DOL) is investigating possible violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et. seq. (FLSA), by La Piedad Corporation (La Piedad), doing business in Harrisonville, Missouri,

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Roy Don Burns, an inmate in the Maximum Security Unit of the Arkansas Department of Corrections (“ADC”), claims that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated when Sgt. Earl Eaton pepper-sprayed Burns when he refused to return to his cell after showering, and Cpl. Renita White turned off the water, preventing Burns from ri

Opinion MARGULIES, J. Under a will executed in 1961, Jean Marie Mooney left the bulk of her estate to her father or, if he predeceased her, to her two sisters, Doris and Lucile, in equal shares. By the time Mooney passed away in 2007, her father and both sisters had predeceased her. Both sisters were survived by adult children. This brought California’s antilapse statute, Probate Code1

*747 MEMORANDUM RULING REBECCA F. DOHERTY, District Judge. Pending before this Court is the “Motion for Summary Judgment” [Doc. 46] filed by defendant McDermott, Inc. (“McDer-mott”). In its motion, McDermott moves for summary judgment in its favor, arguing “the claims of Plaintiff, James Hefren, against McDermott] be dismissed” on grounds p

EDWARD F. MURPHY, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentMurphy v. Comm'rNo. 10239-03L United States Tax Court

James Marcellos Murphy appeals from the judgment of conviction of oral copulation by force or fear (Pen. Code, § 288a)1 and felony false imprisonment (§§ 236, 237) that followed a jury trial. The court sentenced defendant Murphy to total term of six years, consisting of a six-year principal term and a two-year concurrent term.

27 So.3d 899 (2009) Joycelyn MURPHY v. JEFFERSON HEALTH CARE CENTER LLC and Clarendon America Insurance Company. No. 09-CA-304. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. October 27, 2009. *900 H. Edward Sherman, James E. Cazalot, Attorneys at Law, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff/Appellant. G. Frederick Kelly, III, Attorn

Swartzle, JJ. *100 If a crime occurs, but no one reports it, is it still a crime? To ask the question is to answer it. The state of Michigan has an interest in discovering previously unreported crimes, and this interest serves as a rational basis for the Legislature's tolling of the statute

135 P.3d 714 (2006) 212 Ariz. 534 Joyce-Marie BRUNET, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Conway Hubert Peter Brunet, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward G. MURPHY, D.O. and Jane Doe Murphy, husband and wife; Thoracic Cardiovascular Associates, Ltd., an Arizona corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 05-0271. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Departmen

759 F.Supp.2d 854 (2011) Patrick Joseph TURNER et al. v. MURPHY OIL USA, INC. Civil Action No. 05-4206. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. January 3, 2011. *855 Mickey P. Landry, David Ryan Cannella, Frank J. Swarr, Landry & Swarr, LLC, Christopher H. Sherwood, The Law Office of Warren A. Forstall, Jr., Gerald Edwa

Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District In Division JEANETTE PICKENS, ) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. SD37791 ) Filed: March 27, 2024 JAMES E

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia was presented to the court, and briefed and argued by counsel. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the orders of the district c

310 S.W.3d 586 (2010) Dell Edward JAMES, Appellant v. COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee. No. 05-08-01553-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. April 5, 2010. *588 Monica Lynne Luebker, Glast, Phillips & Murray, PC, Dallas, for appellant. Cynthia W. Hamilton, Senior Appellate Counsel, Susan Morgan Farris, Offi

PER CURIAM. *725This matter is before us on appeal by defendants, James Construction Group, L.L.C. ("JCG"), The Continental Insurance Company ("Continental"), State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development ("DOTD"), ABMB Engineers, Inc. ("ABMB Engineers") and Professional Services Industries, Inc. ("PSI"), from a trial court

PER CURIAM. *725This matter is before us on appeal by defendants, James Construction Group, L.L.C. ("JCG"), The Continental Insurance Company ("Continental"), State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development ("DOTD"), ABMB Engineers, Inc. ("ABMB Engineers") and Professional Services Industries, Inc. ("PSI"), from a trial court

607 F.3d 1049 (2010) Ned COMER; Brenda Comer; Eric Haygood, husband of Brenda Haygood; Brenda Haygood; Larry Hunter, husband of Sandra L. Hunter; Sandra L. Hunter; Mitchell Kisielweski, husband of Johanna Kisielweski; Johanna Kisielweski; Elliott Roumain, husband of Rosemary Roumain; Rosemary Roumain; Judy Olson; David Lain, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MURPHY OIL USA; Universal Oil Products (UOP); Shell Oil Company; Exxonmobil Corp.; AES Corp.; All

36 S.W.3d 351 (2001) 343 Ark. 608 Robert MURPHY and Cathy Murphy, His Wife; Billy Joe Campbell and Margaret Ann Campbell, His Wife; Edward Ginger and Brenda Ginger, His Wife; John Lee Cottrell and Delphine Cottrell, His Wife; Ray Kinley and Sandra Kinley, His Wife; Charles Ray and Patricia Ray, His Wife; and Richard Ray and Cheryl Ray, His Wife v. David M. DUMAS and Donnie S. Dumas, His Wife. No. 00-1

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIM LAKE, District Judge. Plaintiff, PEMEX Exploración y Producción (“PEP”), has brought suit against multiple defendants for claims arising from sales in the United States of natural gas condensate allegedly stolen from PEP in Mexico. On June 8, 2012, the court held a scheduling conference and issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order (Docket Entry No. 106) granting th