Cases

KAPALA, District Judge. Defendant-Appellant, James V. Carroll, pled guilty to one count of possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B), and six counts of sexual exploitation of a child, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Carroll now appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress having reserved the right to do so in his plea agreem

[1] OPINION [2] Appellant, Gerald Prideaux, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was convicted in the District Court of Cherokee County, Case No. 2641, of robbery with firearms, and sentenced to five years imprisonment. Judgment and sentence was imposed on March 22, 1971, and this appeal perfected therefrom. [3] It was charged by information that on January 13, 1966, defendant committed the offense of robbery with firearms, in that he did take $3,800 from Rayfo

Owen, J. The appellant contends that the judgment should be reversed with instructions to render judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint. The right to recover upon the counterclaim does not seem to be insisted upon. We are therefore called upon to consider only whether the judgment rendered against the defendant can be supported upon the facts found by the county court. It seems that the county court con

60 N.J. Super. 199 (1960) 158 A.2d 529 RONALD A. WELSH AND JAMES T. WELSH, JR., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GRIFFITH-PRIDEAUX, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued December 14, 1959. Decided March 8, 1960. *200 Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANE

592 F.3d 799 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ted L. PAPPAS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-1595. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued October 8, 2009. Decided January 21, 2010. *800 Jonathan H. Koenig, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, for Plain

Sykes, Circuit Judge. *500 A jury convicted David Bradford of conspiracy to distribute controlled substances and related drug and firearms offenses. His appeal raises three claims of error. First, he contests the denial of his motion to suppress evidence recovered in a search of his home pur

642 N.W.2d 488 (2002) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. William Henry WEBSTER, Appellant, Michael Robert McCoy, Appellant. Nos. C4-01-1375, C9-01-1422. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. April 23, 2002. *489 William J. Hennessy, Cook County Attorney, Michael J. Boese, Assistant County Attorney, Grand Marais, for respondent.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-1080 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID L. BRADFORD, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for t

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0042p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaint

504 N.W.2d 211 (1993) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Arnold Dale WHITE, Appellant. No. C3-92-841. Supreme Court of Minnesota. August 13, 1993. *212 Paul G. Thompson, Bemidji, for appellant. Jeffrey F. Lebowski, Nancy J. Bode, St. Paul, and Timothy R. Fayer, Beltrami County Atty., Bemidji, for respondent. Heard,

151 Ill. App.3d 475 (1986) 502 N.E.2d 822 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL GRAZIANO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2-85-0851. Illinois Appellate Court — Second District. Opinion filed December 31, 1986. *476 Douglas P. Trent and Joseph A. Ricely, both of Law Offices of Trent,

Justice PATTERSON delivered the opinion of the Court. This appeal requires the Court to analyze an agreement for the sale of a residential property and a subsequent lease and repurchase agreement, and to determine whether the transactions collectively gave rise to an equitable mortgage, violated consumer protection statutes, or contravened this Court’s decisio

Honorable James B. Adams Director Texas Department of Public Safety 5805 N. Lamar Boulevard Austin, Texas 78773 Re: Perjurious complaints against law enforcement officers Dear Colonel Adams: Article 6252-20, V.T.C.S., requires that complaints against certain law enforcement officers be placed in writing and signed by the complainants before the complaints may be considered by superiors as a basis for disciplinary action against such officers. You advise that complaints so

SHEPARD, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I concur with the majority in affirming that the appellant irrigation district is liable for damages proximately caused to plaintiff’s properties by its negligence. However, for the reasons stated below I am in agreement with the ruling of the trial court that cross-appellant James Baldwin is barred from recovery by t

245 S.E.2d 518 (1978) 36 N.C. App. 698 Francis Edward PRICE, Jr. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES. No. 7726SC295. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. June 20, 1978. *519 Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten, by Deputy Atty. Gen. Jean A. Benoy, Raleigh, for the respondent-appellee.

HUSPENI, Judge (concurring in part/dissenting in part). The advisory which is based on Minn. Stat. § 169.123, subd. 2(b) (Supp.1989) and which was read to McDonnell, Moser, Weeding, McCauley and Driver, is confusing and inaccurate to some degree for all drivers. However, I conclude it resulted in prejudice to only two: McCauley and Driver. It is upon this basis that I join with the majority in reversing the

509 N.W.2d 380 (1993) Christine E. DAVIS, Petitioner, Appellant (C4-93-874), Jason Curtis Hawker, Petitioner, Respondent (C6-93-1122), Marlana Katherine Schmelzer, Petitioner, Respondent (C8-93-1123), Arlene Ann Lettow, Petitioner, Respondent (CX-93-1124), Scott L. Zimmerman, Petitioner, Appellant (C3-93-1143), Lloyd Dennis Iverson, Petitioner, Respondent (C7-93-1226), Jeffrey Lawrence Yorek, Petitioner, Respondent (C9-93-1227),

The Attorney General of Texas March 31, 1981 MARK WHITE Attorney General Honorable James B. Adams, Director Opinion No. MI+31 7 Texas Department of Public Safety 5805 N. Lamar Boulevard Re: Perjurious complaints against Austin, Texas 78773 law enforcement officers

336 N.W.2d 54 (1983) Milo E. HEDDAN, et al., Appellants, v. Kenneth K. DIRKSWAGER, et al., Respondents, and Milo E. HEDDAN, Appellant, v. John SOPSIC, Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent. Nos. CX-82-1645, C3-83-198. Supreme Court of Minnesota. July 1, 1983. Rehearing Denied August 18, 1983. Nichols, Kruger, Starks & Carruthers

307 Md. 662 (1986) 516 A.2d 970 GEORGE BROSAN v. GIL COCHRAN ET AL. No. 25, September Term, 1986. Court of Appeals of Maryland. November 10, 1986. James J. Doyle, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Pikesville (Stephen H. Sachs, Atty. Gen., on the brief, Baltimore), for appellant. Ellen Luff (Gil Cochran, on the brief), Annapolis, for appellees.