⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “James E Marble, I I I”

West Virginia Supreme Court · 2021-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS April 20, 2021 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEA
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2021-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS FILED April 20, 2021 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991-05-28 · Published · cited 36× · 933 F.2d 1462; 19 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1044; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 10698; 1991 WL 86097
PER CURIAM. The Omaha Indian Tribe (“Tribe”) appeals from the district court’s1 order, issued as a sanction pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(f) and 41(b), granting the defendants’ motions to dismiss with prejudice the Tribe’s action to quiet title to lands located in Monona Bend, Omaha Mission Bend, and Blackbird Bend outside the Barrett Survey. On appeal, the Tribe argues that it
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003-08-15 · Published · cited 199× · 341 F.3d 1292; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 16732
DUBINA, Circuit Judge: In the early 1990’s, plant growers throughout the country filed hundreds of lawsuits against E.I. DuPont De Nemours and Company (“DuPont”) alleging fraud and products liability relating to the DuPont fungicide Benlate. In 1992, Green Leaf Nursery, Inc., a Florida plant nursery, and its owner (“Plaintiffs”) brought such a suit against DuPont in Florida stat
Marble v. Statepublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2015-08-14 · Published · cited 28× · 2015 MT 242; 380 Mont. 366; 355 P.3d 742; 2015 Mont. LEXIS 414
August 14 2015 DA 13-0763 Case Number: DA 13-0763 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2015 MT 242 CODY WILLIAM MARBLE, Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA,
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015-07-20 · Published · cited 1× · 534 B.R. 820; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93852; 2015 WL 4425900
MEMORANDUM OPINION R. DAVID PROCTOR, District Judge. This case is before the court on the Motion to Dismiss Appeal as Equitably Moot (Doc. 7), filed on February 10, 2015. The Motion (Doc. 7) was filed by Appellees Alabama Marble Company, Inc. (the “Debtor”), Blue Devil Investments, Inc. (“Blue Devil”), David Luce (“Luce,” and together with Blue Devil, the “Luce Parties”), TBGS Quarry, LLC (“TBG
State v. Marblepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2007-03-15 · Published · cited 10× · 2007 UT App 82; 157 P.3d 371; 573 Utah Adv. Rep. 17; 2007 Utah App. LEXIS 81; 2007 WL 765285
157 P.3d 371 (2007) 2007 UT App 82 STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Terry James MARBLE, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20060026-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. March 15, 2007. *372 Randall W. Richards and Dee W. Smith, Richards Caine & Allen, Ogden, for Appellant. Mark L. Shurtleff. atty. g
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 11, 2014 Session JAMES E. WHALEN ET AL. v. QUINT BOURGEOIS Appeal from the Chancery Court for Morgan County No. 12-59 Frank V. Williams, III, Chancellor No. E2013-01703-COA-R3-CV-FILED-JUNE 27, 2014 This action arose over the sale of improved real property (“the Property
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2011-05-12 · Published · cited 0× · 60 So. 3d 797; 2011 Miss. LEXIS 244; 2011 WL 1796576
LAMAR, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Time Warner1 employee David Scott Marble was injured when he touched a live electrical wire while attempting to splice a new cable into an old cable. He brought suit against Deviney Construction Company, Inc., alleging that Deviney negligently had dug up the electrical wire and then had failed to secure it. After a trial, the jury found in favo
District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-10-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES BOLAND et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 11-496 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 16 : BRADER MARBLE & GRANITE, LLC et al., :
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010-11-24 · Published · cited 0× · 757 F. Supp. 2d 773; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124669; 2010 WL 3958424
757 F.Supp.2d 773 (2010) MARMI E. GRANITI D'ITALIA SICILMARMI S.p.A., Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL GRANITE AND MARBLE, Defendant. No. 09 C 5529. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 7, 2010. Opinion Denying Reconsideration November 24, 2010. *774 Debra Devassy Babu, Askounis & Dar
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2011-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued August 25, 2011 In The Court of Appeals
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010-11-17 · Published · cited 0× · 938 N.E.2d 1154; 406 Ill. App. 3d 701; 345 Ill. Dec. 233; 2010 Ill. App. LEXIS 1263
938 N.E.2d 1154 (2010) FIRST BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNIQUE MARBLE AND GRANITE CORPORATION and Daniel M. Hahn, Defendants (James Gallo, as Assignee for the Benefit of Creditors of Unique Marble and Granite Corporation, Intervenor-Appellant). No. 2-09-1287. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. November 17, 2010. *1155
Marble v. Statepublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2000-08-31 · Published · cited 8× · 2000 MT 240; 301 Mont. 373; 9 P.3d 617; 2000 Mont. LEXIS 243
JUSTICE NELSON delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Intervenor Benefis Healthcare (Benefis) appeals an Order issued by the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, denying its motion to declare Carolyn Marble (Marble) eligible for Medicaid, and compel payment of Medicaid nursing home benefits. We affirm
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003-07-09 · Published · cited 4× · 72 P.3d 645; 188 Or. App. 579; 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 874
72 P.3d 645 (2003) 188 Or. App. 579 In the Matter of the Compensation of Johnny E. Marble, Claimant. FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, Petitioners, v. Johnny E. MARBLE, Respondent. 99-08754; A117337 Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted March 25, 2003. Decided July 9, 2003.
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010-01-21 · Published · cited 0×
*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Stanback and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the Opinion and Award. The Full Commission AFFIRMS with some modifications the Opin
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2025-10-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WHITE MARBLE LLC, a limited ) liability company organized in ) Delaware and beneficially owned by ) Dr. Xiaodi Hou, and WHITE ) MARBLE INTERNATIONAL ) LIMITED, a company incorporated ) in Samoa and beneficially owned by ) Dr. Xiaodi Hou, ) ) Plaintiffs, )
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991-05-03 · Published · cited 8× · 126 B.R. 463; 16 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 528; 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 619; 1991 WL 69406
126 B.R. 463 (1991) In re ATLANTIC MARBLE, INC., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 90-14484S. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 3, 1991. Eugene J. Malady, Media, Pa., for debtor. James J. O'Connell, Philadelphia, Pa., Asst. U.S. Trustee. Susan Verbonitz, Philadelphia, Pa., for Provident Nat. Bank. *464</
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2024-08-02 · Published · cited 2× · 2024 V.I. 26
For Publication IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS LIMETREE BAY TERMINALS, LLC, ) S. Ct. Civ. No. 2023-0045 Appellant/Defendant, ) Re: Super. Ct. Civ. No. 301/2022 (STX) ) v. ) ) VINCENT LIGER, ) Appellee/Plainti
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001-11-08 · Published · cited 24× · 58 S.W.3d 369; 346 Ark. 487; 2001 Ark. LEXIS 616
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice. [1] Appellant, James Edens, appeals an adverse decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission. This case is before us on petition for review from the Arkansas Court of Appeals; therefore, our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2(e). When we grant review following a decision by the court of appeals, we review the case as though it had been originally