Cases

Opinion issued August 25, 2011 In The Court of Appeals

*1154 Pyle, Judge. Statement of the Case James E. Manley (“Manley”), pro se, appeals the Henry Circuit Court’s order dismissing his petition for writ of state habeas corpus as an unauthorized successive petition for post-conviction relief. Manley contends that his petition was

Darden, Senior Judge. Statement of the Case [1] James Wade Baker, Jr., appeals his convictions by jury of resisting law enforcement by use of a vehicle, a Level 6 felony, 1 and driving while suspended with a prior similar offense within the past ten years, a Class A misdemeanor.

Petition for writ of ha-beas corpus denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied. Same case below, 371 Fed. Appx. 987.

LEE, C.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. In this appeal, we must determine whether the chancellor erred in terminating the father’s parental rights. Finding no error, we affirm. PROCEDURAL HISTORY ¶2. James E. Fuller Jr. and Rachel Weidner are the parents of Remmy Fuller, born February 13, 2009. Fuller and Weid-ner had

355 S.W.3d 375 (2011) CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. James E. BAKER, Appellee. No. 01-09-00881-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). August 25, 2011. *377 David Swanson, Erin Kaye Holmes, Jane Lipscomb Stone, Stone Loughlin & Swanson, LLP, Austin, TX, for Appellant. Alan Brandt Daughtry, Henr

All Justices concur. Darden, Sr.J., Vaidik, C.J., Baker, J.

OPINION SHARPNACK, Judge. Terry Baker ("Terry") files this interlocutory appeal from the probate court's or*607der denying his motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Terry raises three issues, which we consolidate and restate as whether the probate court had personal jurisdiction over Terry. We affirm. The relevant fac

*1033 TATE, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of two consolidated petitions of James É. Baker, a Texas prisoner, for a writ of habeas corpus. In May 1974, Baker was found guilty by a jury of robbery by assault. Sentence, enh

MEMORANDUM ** James E. Baker appeals from the 15-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for failure to disclose material information/federal job training program, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Baker contends that the district court erred by applying a six-level upward adjustment, pursuant to

MEMORANDUM ** James E. Baker appeals from the 15-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for failure to disclose material information/federal job training program, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Baker contends that the district court erred by applying a six-level upward adjustment, pursuant to

214 S.W.3d 239 (2005) James E. BAKER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 04-542. Supreme Court of Arkansas. September 29, 2005. Doug Norwood and Susan Lusby, Rogers, for appellant. Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: Lauren Elizabeth Heil, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellee. BETTY C. DICKEY, Justice. James E. Baker, Jr., app

Per Curiam. James Baker was sentenced to a term of twelve years’ imprisonment for raping his granddaughter. On appeal, Baker argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his confession. He contends that: (1) his confession was involuntarily given because the police did not comply with Ark. R. Crim. P. 2.3 (2004); (2) it was obtained after he had clearly invoked his right to an attor

ORDER AFFIRMING THE BANKRUPTCY COURT STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III, District Judge. Legal claims owned by debtors Michael and Suzie Baker were not disclosed to the bankruptcy court until years after the close of the Bakers’ bankruptcy case. Upon learning of these claims, the bankruptcy trustee (“the Trustee”) reopened the bankruptcy case to dispose of them. The Bakers responded by amending their bankr

FUJISE, PRESIDING JUDGE, LEONARD, REIFURTH, JJ. OPINION OF THE COURT BY LEONARD, J. Plaintiff-Appellee Mark H.K. Greer (Greer) filed a tort action, in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (Circuit Court),1 against Defendant-Appellant State of Hawai'i Senator Rosalyn H. Baker (Senator Baker ).2 Greer alleged

523 F.3d 1141 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. BAKER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-3002. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. February 28, 2008. John K. Henderson, Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender for the District of Kansas, Wichita, KS, appearing for Appellant. Matt Treaste

OPINION BY DUBOW, J.: Appellant, James Duane Baker-Myers, appeals from the August 19, 2016 Judgment of Sentence entered in the Mercer County Court of Common Pleas following his jury conviction of Corruption of Minors, graded as a third-degree felony ("COM-Felony").1 Appellant claims, inter alia, that the Commonwealth's evidence was insufficient to convict him of COM-Felony because the jury acquitted him

Baker, Judge. [1] James Hurwich was the father of Scott Hurwich ("Hurwich") and Stacey MacDonald. The Estate of James Hurwich ("the Estate") was opened in 2004 following his death. MacDonald administered the Estate until it closed in 2007. In 2013, Hurwich petitioned to reopen the Estate, which the probate court granted. In 2014, Hurwich filed a complaint against MacDonald, alleging tha

TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant James Baker appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of ammunition, as well as his sentence. We are called upon to decide whether the jury should have been instructed on Mr. Baker’s proposed “innocent possession” defense to being a felon in possession of ammunition and whether 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(20) of the Armed Ca*13