Cases

255 P.3d 453 (2011) 2011 OK CIV APP 42 ATKINSON, HASKINS, NELLIS, HOLEMAN, PHIPPS, BRITTINGHAM & GLADD, an Oklahoma Professional Corporation, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. VECTOR SECURITIES, INC., an Oklahoma corporation; Vector Properties, Inc.; and James W. Dill, Defendants/Appellants. No. 107,734. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 4.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3613 ___________________________ Craig Eugene Smith Plaintiff Appellant v. James McKinney; Kelly Holder; Leslie Wagers; Niki Whitacre; Jonathan Janssen

Sarah Heffley, Judge. James Bryant appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Lonoke County granting Atkinson Tile a materialman’s lien on Bryant’s property. This case presents two questions: first, must notice be provided to the property owner under Ark. Code Ann. § 18-44-115 (Supp. 2007) before a subcontractor may obtain a valid lien on the property and, second, if the answer to that que

M. J. Kelly, J. (concurring in result). Í would simply hold here that, limited to the facts of this case, the trial judge did not err in including an instruction on second-degree murder where the instruction was with the express consent of the defendant and her attorney. I think the charge in this case can be justified under the rule of People v Carter, 387 Mich 397, 422-423; 197 NW

FILED June 16, 2021 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

Affirmed and Opinion Filed February 10, 2017. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-01211-CR JAMES VERNON HARPER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

FILED June 16, 2021 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

KALODNER, Circuit Judge. These appeals are from judgments entered against the plaintiffs following the *572return by a jury of answers to special interrogatories,1 with no general verdict. Seven actions were instituted in the court below stating claims arising out of a collision between an automobile driven by one Atkins

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BROKERAGE JAMIE GOLDENBERG ) KOMEN REV TRU U/A 06/10/08 JAMIE ) L KOMEN TRUSTEE FOR THE ) BENEFIT OF JAMIE GOLDENBERG ) KOMEN, on behalf of itself and all others ) similarly situated, or, in the alternative, ) derivatively on behalf of FOX ) CORPORATION, ) )

NUMBER 13-99-489-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI ____________________________________________________________________ JAMES FRED HINOTE, Appellant, v.

01/25/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 18, 2021 Session JAMES P. LITTLE, M.D. ET AL. v. CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 11-0407 Jeffrey M. Atherton, Chancellor

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 738 Procedural History and Facts ¶ 1. This case is before us challenging the judgment of the Chancery Court of Sunflower County awarding the custody of minor child, Jeffery Dustin Fulk, to the biological father, Jeffery A. Fulk. Aggrieved, Rhonda Fulk perfected this timely appe

Judge EATON concurs in a separate opinion. SACK, Circuit Judge: Richard James and Ronald Mallay appeal from judgments of conviction based on their participation in a wide-ranging conspiracy that involved fraudulently obtained life insurance policies for members of their extended families and others in the Guyanese and Guyanese-American community, and, in several instances, murder

ORDER NEIL V. WAKE, District Judge. The court has before it Third Party Plaintiff Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company’s (“BNSF’s” or “Railroad’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. #82), and supporting Statement of Facts (“BSOF”) (doc. # 83); Third Party Defendant A-Ceco Equipment Company’s (“A-Ceco’s”) Response (doc. # 108) and supporting Statement of Facts (“ASOF”) (doc. # 109); and the Repl

09-2732-cr United States v. Richard James and Ronald Mallay 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 August Term, 2011 4 (Argued: October 3, 2011; Final submission: July 16, 2012;* 5 Decided: March 28, 2013; Errata Filed: May 1, 2013) 6 Docket Nos. 09-2732-cr, 09-2804-cr 7 ------------------------------------- 8

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge MIKVA. MIKVA, Circuit Judge: This case involves a Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) that seeks financial aid from the Small Business Administration (SBA) under section 303(c) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 683(c) (1982) (

The judgment is affirmed and we justify this action as follows: The suit is upon three disallowed claims against the estate of appellant's intestate. Plaintiff had judgment in the sum of $4,491.19, interest and costs. The attack by appeal is upon the judgment as a whole; hence it is not necessary to consider the items that make it up. The basis of the suit is a contract dated March 29, 1921, between plaintiff and the decedent, wherein decedent agreed to pay plaintiff ten per cen

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JOSEFINA GOMEZ, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v.

636 F.Supp.2d 961 (2007) Harold JAMES, Peter Castillo, and Lee H. Manygoats, Plaintiffs, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY; John Does I-V, husbands and wives; Black Partnerships I-V; and White Corporations I-V, Defendants. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, a Delaware Corporation, Third Party Plaintiff, v. A-Ceco Equipment Company, Inc., an Arizona corporation; Zurich North America d/b/a Steadfast Insurance Co