⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “James Bird”

Young v. Birdpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018-02-21 · Published · cited 0× · 545 S.W.3d 223
DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge Marianne Young appeals from the February 17, 2017 order and decree in favor of Robin and James Bird. Specifically, the trial court reaffirmed a 1986 chancery court decree that Grist Mill Road ("GMR") is a public road and that no individual shall interfere with the right of the public to use the road. Marianne raises two points of appeal: The trial court erred in granting the Birds' motion for a "directed verdi
Bird v. Birdpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008-10-07 · Published · cited 2× · 668 S.E.2d 39; 193 N.C. App. 123; 2008 N.C. App. LEXIS 1754
ARROWOOD, Judge. Defendant (James Bird, II), appeals from summary judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff (Deborah Bird). We reverse. The parties met in 1978, when they were in high school. They married in 1985 and had two children, boys bom in 1994 and 1997. They separated in January 2004, and in June 2004 Plaintiff filed an action seeking child custody and support, alimony and post-separation support, an
Bird v. Coloradopublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-04-01 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 1468
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Colorado denied.
Bird v. Birdpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009-02-05 · Published · cited 0× · 672 S.E.2d 683; 363 N.C. 122; 2009 N.C. LEXIS 52
Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiff on the 9th day of December 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is
Bird v. Birdpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2010-01-29 · Published · cited 1× · 363 N.C. 774; 688 S.E.2d 420; 2010 N.C. LEXIS 34
MARTIN, Justice. This appeal from a divided decision of the Court of Appeals presents the question of whether defendant’s forecast of evidence was sufficient to overcome plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to plaintiff. We affirm. Plaintiff Deborah Hampton Bird and defendant James Calvin Bird, II were married on 18 August
In Re Birdpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008-10-17 · Published · cited 0× · 396 B.R. 613; 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 3370; 2008 WL 4905502
396 B.R. 613 (2008) In re George H. BIRD, Debtor. In re James L. Crawn and Marie A. Crawn, Debtors. In re Bruce E. Ashley, Debtor. In re Randy A. Kellock, Debtor. In re Jeffrey Scott McKeown and Lori L. McKeown, Debtors. Nos. 5-05-bk-52403, 5-05-bk-56154, 5-05-bk-57141, 5-05-bk-57500, 5-06-bk-51121. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. October 17, 2008.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-05-17 · Published · cited 0× · 245 So. 3d 742
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Damoorgian, Forst and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.
Washington Supreme Court · 2012-10-25 · Published · cited 38× · 175 Wash. 2d 756; 287 P.3d 551
Wiggins, J. ¶45 (dissenting) — Farmers Insurance Exchange challenges the reasonableness hearing procedure in the covenant judgment between its insured, Best Plumbing Group LLC, and the party injured by Best Plumbing, James Bird. Because the stipulated damages, if they are reasonable, will become the presumptive measure of damages in a subsequent bad faith claim, Farmers argues that it has been deprived of the right to a jury deter
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011-05-02 · Published · cited 3× · 260 P.3d 209; 161 Wash. App. 510
260 P.3d 209 (2011) 161 Wn. App. 510 James A. BIRD, Respondent, v. BEST PLUMBING GROUP, LLC, Respondent, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, Appellant. No. 64291-0-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. March 21, 2011. Publication Ordered May 2, 2011. *211 Jerret Sale, Deborah C
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012-06-06 · Published · cited 1× · 126 So. 3d 1115; 2012 WL 2012558; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9063
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM. We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute the following in its place. In this mortgage foreclosure action, appellant, Denise Martinec, appeals a final judgment entered in favor of Early Bird International (EBI). Appellant raised defenses and counterclaims below, seeking relief under the Fe
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011-03-21 · Published · cited 0× · 160 Wash. App. 1035
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kang County, No. 07-2-14723-3, Hollis R. Hill, J., entered October 2, 2009. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Lau, J., concurred in by Cox and Appelwick, JJ. Now published at 161 Wn. App. 510.
State v. Birdpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005-05-23 · Published · cited 0× · 127 Wash. App. 1039; 2005 Wash. App. LEXIS 2003
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 03-1-09109-6, Nicole Machones, J., entered August 9, 2004. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
State v. Birdpublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2002-01-15 · Published · cited 40× · 2001 MT 2; 43 P.3d 266; 308 Mont. 75; 2002 MT 2; 2002 Mont. LEXIS 2
JUSTICE RICE dissenting. ¶50 I respectfully dissent. *86¶51 As it did in the similar case of State v. Tapson, 2001 MT 292, 307 Mont. 428, the Court ignores longstanding precedent in reaching its decision herein. Further, the Court misapprehends the fundamental role of defense cou
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-01-24 · Published · cited 0× · 219 F. App'x 713
MEMORANDUM *** Jason Townsend Bird (Bird) appeals his sentence of thirty-six months imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. He contends that 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(b)(2) are unconstitutional and that the sentence is unreasonable because the district judge considered factors impermissible under § 3583(e). He also complains that the judgment erroneously state
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016-08-23 · Published · cited 0× · 668 F. App'x 68
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Latwon James appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion seeking a sentence reduction under Amendment 782. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304-05 (4th Cir. 2013) (reviewing dis
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015-08-06 · Published · cited 21× · 619 F. App'x 733
Judge KELLY concurs in the judgment. ORDER AND JUDGMENT* SCOTT M. MATHESON, JR., Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs sued the Regents of New Mexico State University (NMSU) and five NMSU officials. In their fourth amended complaint, they alleged defendants discriminated against them based on their' race, retaliated against them for making discrimination claims, and reta
Bird v. Thompsonpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2003-07-08 · Published · cited 4× · 315 F. Supp. 2d 369; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11510; 2003 WL 21537748
315 F.Supp.2d 369 (2003) Dorothy BIRD, Plaintiff, v. Tommy G. THOMPSON, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services and Empire Medicare Services, Defendants. No. 02 Civ. 10269(GEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 8, 2003. *370 Robert Weiss, New York, New York, for plaintiff. Sarah E. Light, Assist
Fort Peck Appellate Court · 2001-10-29 · Published · cited 0× · 3 Am. Tribal Law 346
OPINION AND ORDER GARY P. SULLIVAN, Chief Justice. BRIEF FACTUAL OVERVIEW AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Faye Marie Bird and James Wein-berger are enrolled members2 of the Fort Peck Tribes and reside within the exterior boundaries of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Faye was pregnant and sought medical treatment and services from Elaine Becker, allegedly employed by t
Bird v. Dzurendapublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-03-13 · Published · cited 8× · 131 F.4th 787
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KEITH PAUL BIRD, No. 23-2664 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:20-cv-02093- ART-NJK v. JAMES DZURENDA; HAROLD WICKHAM; BRIAN WILLIAMS OPINION Sr.; JULIE MATOUSCK; MONIQUE HUBBARD-PICKETT; JOHNATHON BINDER; THOMAS; ALEXIS LO
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010-12-16 · Published · cited 38× · 706 S.E.2d 652; 307 Ga. App. 640; 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 4080; 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 1147
706 S.E.2d 652 (2010) ALSTON & BIRD, LLP et al. v. MELLON VENTURES II, L.P. et al. No. A10A1563. Court of Appeals of Georgia. December 16, 2010. Reconsideration Denied January 27, 2011. *654 Cook, Noell, Tolley & Bates, Edward D. Tolley, Sutherland, Thomas W. Curvin, Amy K. Averill, Atlanta, for appellant