Cases

PER CURIAM: The order of the District Court denying petition for writ of habeas corpus is set aside. Jackson v. Oliver, 391 U.S. 602, 88 S.Ct. 1866, 20 L.Ed.2d 846 (1968); Peyton v. Rowe, 391 U.S. 54, 88 S.Ct. 1549, 20 L.Ed.2d 426 (1968). The matter is remanded to the District Court for further proceedings.

GRIFFIN, J. Arthur Lee Jackson [“Jackson”] appeals his judgment and sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and for carrying a concealed firearm. Jackson argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress and by failing to conform the written sentence for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon with its oral pronouncement of sentence. There was no error in the de

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: * Plaintiff-appellant Mark Morehouse (“Morehouse”) appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, and its denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). For the reasons explained below, we VACATE the district court’s order and REMAND with instructions to dismiss Morehouse’s complaint

03/23/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 22, 2022 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES ARTHUR EVANS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bledsoe County No. 2019-CR-27 J. Curtis Smith, Judge ___________________________________

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Charlotte Kokocinski brought a shareholder derivative action on behalf of Med-tronic, Inc., against current and former directors and officers of Medtronic, and against Medtronic as a nominal defendant. The district court 1 dismissed the action on the basis of a report by a special litigation committee

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-17-00189-CR JAMES ARTHUR BAXLEY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 8th District Court Hopkins County, Texas Trial Court No. 1725860 Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Opinion by Justice Burgess

ACCEPTED 12-15-00017-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 12/4/2015 4:00:03 PM

IRVING, P.J., dissenting: ¶ 21. I agree with the majority that Fenelon, at the time of this incident, was *767an invitee and that Metroeenter had a duty to exercise reasonable care to protect her from reasonably foreseeable injury at the hands of other patrons. The majority finds, however, that the circuit court did not err in granting summary judgment

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge. Pending before the Court are Defendant Mark A. Jackson’s (“Jackson”) Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Under Rule 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted (Doc. No. 35), and Defendant James J. Ruehlen’s (“Ruehlen”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. No. 36). After considerin

ACCEPTED 12-15-00017-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/5/2015 10:00:26 PM Pam Estes

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00760-CR James Arthur Brown, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-13-300630, HONORABLE DAVID CRAIN, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM: This appeal concerns a civil rights action for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1970), 1 in which appellant’s complaint was dismissed by way of summary judgment. Jackson, a state prisoner, bases his action on certain events surrounding his a

JENNIFER WALEER ELROD, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the majority opinion’s conclusion that the Master Settlement Agreement (“MSA”) does not incorporate the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger. Moreover, even if the majority opinion’s interpretation of the MSA were correct, Texas Employers’ Association v. Jackson, 862 F.2d 491 (5th Cir.1988), and its

ACCEPTED 03-13-00760-CR 3596204 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

ACCEPTED 03-13-00760-CR 4406706 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN,

AFFIRM and Opinion Filed this 12th day of April, 2013. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-11-00906-CR No. 05-11-00907-CR ARTHUR JAMES HENDERSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS,

1GLENN B. GREMILLION, Judge. In this case, one of the defendants, Rubicon, Inc., appeals the trial court’s judgment imposing in solido liability among the defendants, in favor of the plaintiffs, James and Debra Jackson.1 We affirm for reasons other than those given by the trial court. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In March 1998, the Jacksons filed suit f

ACCEPTED 03-13-00760-CR 3627987 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AU

JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: On February 6, 1973, Arthur Jackson, an eighteen-year old inmate in the Mississippi State Prison (Parchman), 1 lost his left eye as a result of a ricochet bullet fired from a sawed-off shotgun by Lepoleon Reed, an armed trusty shooter. 2

LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge: Following a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, appellants Earnest Jackson, Jr., and James Arthur Porter, III, were convicted under a two-count indictment of violating the federal narcotics laws. Count One charged appellants with conspiracy to distri