⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “James Andrew Tucker”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003-10-16 · Published · cited 49× · 345 F.3d 320
FURGESON, District Judge: Defendant-Appellant Richard James Tucker appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of securities fraud and one count of mail fraud on the ground that the district court improperly excluded his securities expert. Tucker also appeals the district court’s 1) failure to submit an element of the crimes charged to the jury, 2) misstatement o
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016-03-29 · Published · cited 0× · 189 So. 3d 690; 2016 Miss. App. LEXIS 162; 2016 WL 1203808
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CA-00240-COA FRANCIS TUCKER APPELLANT v. DELTA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/23/2014 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. W. ASHLEY HINES COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPE
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2024-07-01 · Published · cited 1× · 551 P.3d 465; 2024 WY 72
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2024 WY 72 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2024 July 1, 2024 ANDREW JAMES KELLER, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-23-0264 THE STATE OF WYOMING, Appellee (Plaintiff). Appeal fr
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004-04-29 · Published · cited 129× · 848 A.2d 113; 577 Pa. 598; 32 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1705; 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1193
CONCURRING OPINION Justice SAYLOR. I join the majority opinion, except for its determination that a cause of action would be stated upon the filing of an amended complaint alleging some unequivocal communication *636to Appellant-newspapers that the Tuckers’ loss of spousal consortium claim did not include a claim for loss of sexual rel
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008-09-26 · Published · cited 2× · 2008 Ohio 4986
OPINION *Page 2 {¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant, Scott D. Tucker, appeals the January 11, 2008 judgment entry of the Richland County Court of Common Pleas denying Appellant's motion to dismiss based upon speedy trial grounds. STATEMENT OF THE CASE1 {¶ 2} Appellant was arrested on or about
State v. Tuckerpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020-08-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-715 Filed: 18 August 2020 Mecklenburg County, Nos. 17 CRS 234118-119, 234122-123, 032613 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MITCHELL ANDREW TUCKER, Defendant. Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 30 May 2018 by Judge Jesse B. Caldwell III in Mecklenburg County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 1 April 2020. Attor
State v. Tuckerpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020-08-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA19-715 Filed: 18 August 2020 Mecklenburg County, Nos. 17 CRS 234118-119, 234122-123, 032613 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MITCHELL ANDREW TUCKER, Defendant. Appeal by defendant from judgments entered 30 May 2018 by Judge Jesse B. Caldwell III in Mecklenburg County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 1 April 2020. Attor
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021-03-16 · Published · cited 23× · 991 F.3d 902
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-2916 ___________________________ Kathy Swedberg Plaintiff - Appellant v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-12-28 · Published · cited 0×
§§§§§ . . Chris Dan jet - cause No.1428697-A ' » °'Sfr"¢=v ci§,-§ _ “ ' _ ij61132015 _ _ 'T|mTe`.' E)< PART_E § , iN THE 1,§4 ~ ~ - oouifiy _ _ - _ § oF - ERlc sAMuELTucKER, 1 cr q ' - Applicant , §A HARRis coquFY~;T~§x?'i\ifs _F . ' l . " `;' STATE' S PRCPOSED FlND|NGS OF FA_G]§J Acosta C|er~k CONCLUS|ONS OF LAW, AND ORDER The Court has considered the application for Writ of habeas .corpu`s, the ' $tate’s Original Answer, and.officia| court records in the-above-captione'd cause. ` " T
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-05-01 · Published · cited 0×
05/01/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 20, 2017 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANDREW YOUNG JOHNSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County No. S38912 R. Jerry Beck, Judge No. E2017-00756-CCA-R3-CD The petitioner, A
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020-11-20 · Published · cited 45× · 980 F.3d 1015
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1529 LISA PROBST, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant - Appellant. No. 19-1531 SHARRON BRADSHAW, Plaintiff - Appellee,
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012-05-30 · Published · cited 0× · 862 F. Supp. 2d 715; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74729; 2012 WL 1940335
ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge. This is a criminal case in which defendant Demetrius Lamont Tucker seeks a reduced sentence based on Amendment 750 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, with respect to convictions for offenses involving crack cocaine. Pending is defendant’s motion for sentence reduction. [Doc. 24]. For the following reasons, I grant the motion.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024-01-11 · Published · cited 5× · 90 F.4th 1115
USCA11 Case: 23-10459 Document: 89-1 Date Filed: 01/11/2024 Page: 1 of 59 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10459 ____________________ ANDREW H. WARREN,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024-01-10 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 23-10459 Document: 85-1 Date Filed: 01/10/2024 Page: 1 of 59 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10459 ____________________ ANDREW H. WARREN,
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016-05-24 · Published · cited 0× · 490 S.W.3d 389; 2016 WL 2994130; 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 537
OPINION James M. Dowd, Judge Andrew Stanley appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. In three points on appeal, Stanley claims the court erred in denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing because (1) a blind guilty plea is inherently unconstitutional under the Missouri and United States
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013-09-19 · Published · cited 7× · 324 Ga. App. 172; 748 S.E.2d 300; 36 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1293; 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 2984; 2013 WL 5273105; 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 769
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge. Jon V. Davidson, Jr., appeals from the trial court’s order compelling him to arbitrate his defamation claim against his former employer, A. G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., and others1 (“A. G. Edwards”). He contends that his post-termination of employment claim does not fall within the scope of the arbitration clause at issue under the Georgia Arbitration Code, arguing that he
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2022-05-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 21-0753 Filed May 11, 2022 JAMES McKIERNAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Sean McPartland, Judge. James McKiernan appeals from a summary judgment ruling. AFFIRMED. Peter C. Riley of T
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2024-10-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-1891 Filed October 30, 2024 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. GARRET JAMES WASSOM, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clay County, Andrew Smith, Judge. A defendant directly appeals from three misdemeanor convictions, challenging whether five exhibits
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015-10-20 · Published · cited 0× · 539 B.R. 760
AMENDED TRIAL OPINION1 Thomas J. Tucker, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. Introduction The Court held a joint bench trial in these two adversary proceedings, followed by two. rounds of briefing filed after the close of evidence. The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties; all of the exhibits admitted into evidence at trial, namely Stipulated
Com. v. James, Jpublic domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023-06-12 · Published · cited 63× · 297 A.3d 755; 2023 Pa. Super. 106
J-A01030-23 2023 PA Super 106 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : JESSIE JAMES : :