Cases

JORDAN, Circuit Judge: Generally speaking, the doctrine of equitable mootness "permits courts sitting in bankruptcy appeals to dismiss challenges (typically to confirmation plans) when effective relief would be impossible." Ullrich v. Welt (In re Nica Holdings, Inc.) ,

ACCEPTED 15-25-00005-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/25/2025 2:57 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE No. 15-25-00005-CV CLERK FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CP-01339-COA JAMES ROBINSON A/K/A JAMES D. APPELLANT ROBINSON A/K/A JAMES DEE ROBINSON v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/16/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ANDREW K. HOWORTH COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LAFAYETT

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SONYA PORTER, Sheriff of Logan County, West Virginia, Petitioner FILED November 13, 2019 vs) 18-0729 (Logan County No. 13-C-165) released at 3:00 p.m. E

455 S.E.2d 110 (1995) 216 Ga. App. 532 BECK v. The STATE. No. A94A2140. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 8, 1995. *111 Bates, Kelehear, Starr & Toland, James E. Toland, Jr., Dalton, for appellant. Jack O. Partain, III, Dist. Atty., Dalton, for appellee. ANDREWS, Judge. Beck was c

410 F.3d 1104 Andrew BARTON; Kenneth Borenstein; Gerri Marin; Trishia Medema; and James Meythaler, Petitioners,v.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent,Smithkline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline, A Pennsylvania Corporation, Real Party in Interest. No. 05-71086. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge. We grant a writ of mandamus to prevent disclosure of communications by prospective clients to their lawyers. Facts. Plaintiffs sued SmithKline Beecham Corporation, which does business as GlaxoSmithKline. They claim injury from Paxil, a medication manufactured by Smith-Kline. Plaintiffs did not initiate contact with their lawyers by walking into the law off

204 Ga. App. 552 (1992) 420 S.E.2d 23 BYERS v. THE STATE. DUNSMORE v. THE STATE. HESTER v. THE STATE. A92A0075, A92A0076, A92A0077. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided June 1, 1992. Reconsideration Denied June 11, 1992. Bates, Kelehear & Starr, James E. Toland, Jr., for appellant (case no. A92A

Barnes, Presiding Judge. *688 *892 These companion appeals arise out of an automobile collision involving Patricia Ann Carr and Jenny Jung Ah Yim ("Yim"). Following the collision, Carr sued Yim f

USCA4 Appeal: 23-4737 Doc: 61 Filed: 08/25/2025 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-4737 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. WILLIAM DAYSHAWN WILSON, a/k/a Santana, a/k/a Dayshawn,

129 Ga. App. 102 (1973) 198 S.E.2d 879 RARY v. GUESS. 48120. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued May 2, 1973. Decided May 15, 1973. Tom Pye, Lewis M. Groover, Jr., for appellant. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Eugene G. Partain, James H. Keaten, Daniel M. Coursey, Jr., Russell & Nardone, A. Josep

519 S.E.2d 253 (1999) 238 Ga. App. 463 LUCAS v. LOVE et al. No. A99A0385. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 8, 1999. *255 L.B. Kent, Columbus, for appellant. Bovis, Kyle & Burch, John H. Peavy, Jr., Atlanta, for appellees. *254 RUFFIN, Judge. Wi

208 Ga. App. 422 (1993) 430 S.E.2d 668 STATE OF GEORGIA v. WILBANKS. A92A2284. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided March 19, 1993. Reconsideration Denied April 2, 1993. Jack O. Partain III, District Attorney, Gary D. Bergman, Special Assistant District Attorney, for appellant. William W. Keith III, Karen E.

Clarke, Justice. On its own motion this court granted certiorari in these cases to address the issue of the interpretation of OCGA § 33-34-5 (formerly Code Ann. § 56-3404b) by the Court of Appeals in this litigation, Atlanta Cas. Co. v. Flewellen, 164 Ga. App. 885 (300 SE2d 166) (1982) and that court’s overruling of its prior decision in Jones v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 156 Ga. App. 230 (274 SE2d 62

Memorandum Adopting Report and Recommendation re Indefiniteness of '884, '651, & '715 Patents RON CLARK, District Judge. This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, and he has recommended that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment of indefindteness regarding United States Patent No. 6,271,884, U.S. Patent No. 6,838,651, and U.S. Patent No. 6

McMurray, Presiding Judge, concurring specially and dissenting in part. I agree with the majority in holding that members of the Board of Education and Superintendent James Hagin are immune from individual liability based on official immunity, but not for the reason given. I believe official immunity protects the Board of Education and Superintendent James Hagin because these school officials complied with

467 S.E.2d 373 (1996) 220 Ga. App. 54 COULTAS v. DUNBAR et al. No. A95A1974. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 1, 1996. *374 William R. Sotter, Athens, for appellant. Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, William C. Joy, Mary F. Russell, Senior Assistant Attorneys General, Harman, Owen, Saunders

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANDREW BARTON; KENNETH  BORENSTEIN; GERRI MARIN; TRISHIA MEDEMA; and JAMES MEYTHALER, Petitioners, v. No. 05-71086 UNITED STATES DISTRICT D.C. No. COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,  CV-01-07937-MRP Respondent,

JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judge: *1125Coal companies in the United States long ago promised in wage agreements to provide their employees with health care benefits at no cost to the employees and to continue to provide these benefits even after the employees' retirement. A quarter century ago, Congress turned this contractual obligation into a s

BALMER, C. J. The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The final order of the Land Use Board of Appeals is affirmed. *117 BALMER, C. J. This case concerns the interpretation of Oregon’s historic property designation consent statute, ORS 197.772. T