Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER2 STANLEY, United States Magistrate Judge. Currently pending before the court is Plaintiffs’ Renewed3 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed January 6, 2006 (Docket Sheet Document # 121). All Defendants have responded to Plaintiffs’ Motion (## 125, 127, 128, 132), and Plaintiffs have replied (# 129). On February 14, 20

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114 (Fla.2000). ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Michael K. Allen, Judge. This matter is before the court for decision on defendant’s motion to suppress. At approximately 2:40 a.m. on February 19, 1995, while sitting in a marked police car, Officer Paul Rook of the Springfield Township Police Department noticed defendant Timothy Harper drive his vehicle into a parking lot where Officer Rook was conversing with another officer. Defendant Harper entered the lot

427 F.Supp.2d 707 (2006) James Allen HARPER, a resident and citizen of Ohio previously doing business as Southern Ohio Disposal, and Southern Ohio Disposal LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA, Jon W. McKinney,[1] in his official capacity as Chairman of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia; Edward H. Staats, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Pub

396 F.3d 348 James Allen HARPER, a resident and citizen of Ohio previously doing business as Southern Ohio Disposal; Southern Ohio Disposal LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA; Edward H. Staats, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia; R. Michael Shaw, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Judge CONRAD joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: In this case we consider the effect of the commerce power on a federal court’s dis *350

291 F.Supp.2d 443 (2003) James Allen HARPER, a resident and citizen of Ohio previously doing business as Southern Ohio Disposal, and Southern Ohio Disposal LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA, Edward H. Staats, Chairman,[1] R. Michael Shaw, Commissioner, and Martha Y. Walker, Commissioner, Defendants. WV Association of Solid Waste Haulers and Recyclers, BFI Waste Systems

LAY, Circuit Judge. Inmates in lockup at the Iowa State Penitentiary (“ISP”) brought a claim against Charles Harper and other Prison Officials (“Prison Officials”) based on constitutional violations in long-term lockup at ISP. In 1994, before the merits of the case were heard, the district court granted the inmates a preliminary injunction based on the denial of time-cuts from t

ERVIN, Judge. We reverse the order denying appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus. When the Florida Parole and Probation Commission established appellant’s presumptive parole release date (PPRD) as August 28, 1996, after his parole was revoked, it included 60 months for use of a handgun during the commission of the offense as an aggravating factor. This was error. The same factor had been used in setting appellant’s previ

*186 BY THE COURT: Appellant was convicted in the District Court of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2312, interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle. At his trial by jury, counsel for appellant twice moved for judgment of acquittal, first at the completion of the Government’s case, and again after appellan

551 S.E.2d 419 (2001) 250 Ga. App. 300 SUNTRUST BANK, MIDDLE GEORGIA, N.A. et al. v. HARPER. Harper v. SunTrust Bank, Middle Georgia, N.A. et al. Nos. A01A0105, A01A0106. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 2, 2001. *421 Jones, Cork & Miller, Hubert C. Lovein, Jr., Macon, for appellants.

995 P.2d 1143 (2000) 2000 OK 6 STATE of Oklahoma ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Complainant v. Charles C. HARPER, Respondent. No. SCBD 4444. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. February 1, 2000. Allen J. Welch, Oklahoma Bar Association, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Attorney for Complainant. Jack S. Dawson, James A. Scimeca, Miller Dollarhide, Ok

Ronald Burton filed a claim for unemployment compensation with the Department of Industrial Relations and was determined to be eligible for benefits by a claims examiner. That decision was subsequently reversed by an appeals referee, and Burton's application for leave to appeal was denied. Burton then appealed to the circuit court for a trial de novo. On the date set for trial, Burton did not appear in court, and the trial court dismissed the case. Burton filed a motion to vaca

Judgment rendered November 16, 2022. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 54,789-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** JULIUS HARPER

235 F.3d 410 (8th Cir. 2000) GEORGE GOFF; PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,ALLEN LANGLEY, CLASS REPRESENTATIVE; TIM THOMPSON, CLASS REPRESENTATIVE; PLAINTIFFS,v.CHARLES HARPER; RONALD WELDER; JOHN HENRY; GERARDO ACEVEDO, WARDEN; DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.GEORGE GOFF; ALLEN LANGLEY, CLASS REPRESENTATIVE; TIM THOMPSON, CLASS REPRESENTATIVE; PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,MICHAEL A. BARTNICK; INTERVENOR PLAINTIFF,v.CHARLES HARPER; DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,

OPINION BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge. This matter is before the court on appeal from a February 18, 2016 Memorandum Opinion and Order (the “February 18, 2016 Decision”) of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Kentucky (“Bankruptcy Court”) in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case In re Conco, Inc., No. 12-34933-jal, 2016 WL 675549 (Bankr. W.D. Ky.). In that opinion and or

46 F.Supp.2d 867 (1999) ALLEN ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. BARTELL INDUSTRIES, INC. and Darragh Company, Defendants. No. J-C-95-143. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division. April 13, 1999. *868 *869 Stephen D. Carver, Carver Patent Law, Ltd., Little Rock, AR,

PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. Petitioners, defendants in the trial court, executed a written waiver of their speedy trial rights. Consequently, the strictures of Rule 3.191, Fla.R.Crim.P., are inapplicable at this stage of the proceedings. See Butterworth v. Fluellen, 389 So.2d 968 (Fla.1980); Gallego v. Purdy, 415 So.2d 166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). LETTS a

ALMA WILSON, Justice. Lester and Myrtle Briscoe own and reside on a 146 acre farm in Grady County. A portion of the farm is devoted to wheat and alfalfa. The Briscoes [appellees] also maintain a small cattle operation on their farm. Grazing areas include love, bermuda and native grasses. On January 23, 1976, the appellees executed an oil and gas lease to the appellant, Harper Oil Company [Harper]. Pursuant to

FILED Apr 24 2025, 8:57 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals